-
Posts
665 -
Joined
-
-
Yes, it's a necro-post. But I think it's a topical one given War Witch's celebrated new position. People less familiar with our new Design Lead might like a chance to see and enjoy what she's written.
-
Quote:I believe Nvidia has abandoned support of the old PCI PhysX cards (yet another of their desperate "buy one of our newer cards, fanboy!" tactics of late). If you are running XP or Win 7 (but not Vista), I believe you can have two seperate set of graphics drivers installed at the same time. Until you find a more permanent solution, you might try doing that and using the newer drivers for the new game and the older, PhysX card-supporting drivers for CoX.Well Nvidia has been zero help and does not respond to support tickets apparently. Any advice from others here? My next step is to consider a full re-install of my PC to flush out all the drivers and such.
I *think* all of the 8xxx and newer series Nvidia processors are supposed to support PhysX acceleration (7xxxs do not). You also might try removing the PhysX card and reinstalling the new drivers to see if it will be enabled without the physical card in there for the installer to turn its nose up at. -
Quote:The 9400 GT is below Positron's OP minimum of a 9500 GT. Will you be able to play Going Rogue? I'd be very surprised if you couldn't. Will you be able to play Going Rogue in graphical Ultra Mode? Poorly if at all with what we've been told so far.Ok, so here's my comp:
Core 2 Duo 2.8 ghz
2gb ram (soon to be 4gb)
nVidia GeForce 9400 GT 512mb vd
Now, I can run Oblivion and CO on fairly high settings with the current components in my comp. I don't think Going Rogue will give me trouble, but, any thoughts anyone? -
Quote:Actually, you can have two different models of Nvidia card in your computer (like the tiny GT 220 with two GTX 260s) and the Graphics Drivers can be set to designate one of them as a "dedicated PhysX processor". It's like having one of the old add-in PhysX PCI cards, but faster and still market-available. With CoX I don't think it should do anything, but it matters for games like Batman Arkham Asylum.It's not a seperate card. All nVidia cards have built-in PhysX now. That just appears to be some type of marketing mumbo jumbo attempting to point out the PhysX as a seperate entity even though it's not anymore.
As to the original question, if that beast doesn't run Ultra Mode, something is seriously wrong. -
Quote:That's what I said; it's going to give solid performance.I beg your pardon.
While yes the 2.8GHz E6300 does suffer from a lower performing memory subsystem due the 2MB of L2 cache and a "slow" 1066MHz FSB it's not bad for an $80 CPU. A future $600 rig may include a AM3 based CPU but the price of DDR3 is a problem.
And the GTS 250 isn't a slouch either. Yes it's essentially been around since Dec 2007 as the 512MB 8800GTS, but with a 14% OC. But at only $130 it's tough to beat. The HD 5750 is a little better, it generally cost a little more. -
I direct you to Father Xmas' prospective $600 CoX computer build. Note that this build does not include keyboard, mouse, or monitor. This won't run CoX spectacularly, but will run it very solidly.
-
Quote:Whoa there, Tex! Take a look at this first. This is what I meant about an adaptor.Heatsink... I'm actually using a Zalman CNPS9500 AT 2 Ball Fan/Heatsink at the moment. ... Which doesn't appear to be compatible with Socket 1156. Cooler Master iti s, then.
Do read the reviews, there may be some fiddling for installation if there are large mosfet heatsinks nearby. But if it will work, $9 is less than $30. There's also another kit that Zalman offers, but I don't see it on Newegg's site yet. You might contact Zalman and ask about them both with your 9500. -
*Facepalm*
CPU Cooler!
#1 Are you okay with using the stock cooler that comes with the Intel chip?
#2 If you aren't, what cooler are you currently using?
Socket 1156 uses a different hole arrangement for cooler mounting than Socket 775 did (or 1366 does =P). You may need a mounting adapter kit for an after-market cooler. -
Quote:Do you plan on buying a second GTX 275 to use in SLI? If you don't, you really don't need the second PCIe x16 slot - and the attendant price increase that comes with it. Was there some other feature you wanted that board for?All right. Beginning to look at parts, now...
Motherboard: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813130239
The single GTX 275 on a 23 inch monitor should probably handle whatever you're going to throw at for a good long while. Long enough it would be more cost effective to upgrade to a new generation card when the time comes.
The RAM's fine. Corsair works. However, *do* comparison shop with the RAM because the companies weekly try to cut each others' throats. Furthermore, if you don't want to spend the money for 1600 RAM, 1333 or even 1066 will do fine; the difference in performance is nominal. Also don't be too afraid to buy "naked" RAM without a heat spreader; the DDR3 RAM operates at much lower voltage than the older DDR2 RAM and doesn't heat up as much.
Quote:How does that look? Should I pick up an extra 2 GB of RAM, or leave it at 4 for now?
I don't know if that's going to interfere with your planned recording and I have no clue what impact it's going to have in "that other game" at all.
Quote:I apologize for all the obvious questions, thus far. I really appreciate all the help.
It looks a solid machine to me. -
Quote:If you get a 5770, I'd go with a different brand than Powercolor. XFX, Sapphire, or something above the bargain-basement.Radeon 5770 are good, I hear,...
-
Quote:A "good Core 2 quad" will be around 2.66 GHz right now. For single/dual core-using applications like CoX, that will mean a *drop* in performance from your current 3 GHz dual core. The i5-750 is a 2.66 GHz quad that will automatically overclock itself to above 3 GHz when two or fewer cores are in use (staying inside its thermal design specs). It also has a newer architecture and slightly better performance per clock cycle than the Core 2s.I believe it's the latter - at least, disk useage vs. cpu useage seems to suggest it. Would a Quad be the way to go over an I5, for the moment? Right now, I've my eye on the I5... but if I can get by, for now, with a Quad - then I'm happy with settling a bit lower until I can better afford the higher.
The main thing I'm trying to avoid is shooting 'too low' - while, at the same time, trying to avoid going for the 'latest and greatest' when it's likely more than I'll need.
The difference in price between a 2.66 GHz Core 2 quad and the i5-750 is $20. You get the speed of a high end dual core when you need it and the flexibility and performance of a high end quad core when you need it.
Above the i5-750 you have the i7-860 and 870 for much more money that have a slightly higher base clock and the ability to engage hyperthreading to treat each of their four cores as two virtual cores (8 total). The i5-750 is a quality workhorse, not a status symbol. -
Quote:You have two possible bottlenecks there. Once is HD write speed. The other is processor availability. A quad would give you more real estate for the latter and I have no idea if the former is actually a problem for you.I use Fraps now, actually. It's just that doing so tends to cause my framerate to plummet no matter whether I'm recording full-size or half-size - depending on the game. Machinama has always been an interest of mine - but I'd havet o be able to record smooth, quality footage first.
-
Quote:Well, that's kind of all you need to look for atm, I think. You've got a separate sound card, so you don't need the integrated sound. You didn't mention anything about legacy firewire-based components you need to accommodate. You don't have a RAID array you need to feed with a set number of SATA connectors. The Socket 1156 boards absorbs most of the old Chipset functions into the processor so the only variant for i5-750 is the P55/P55A* chipset. ...Beyond number of PCIe x16 slots for single/multiple graphics cards that's sort of all the different selling points of motherboards obviated right there. As to brands, people seem to generally like Asus, Gigabyte, and MSI.That may, in fact, be doable. Are there any particular brands or types of motherboards you woudl recommend to go with the I5? I was actually peeking at that processor earlier and giving it some consideration... I just wasn't certain how fast it would become 'low-end'. I'm really not sure what I'm looking for in a motherboard, aside from the requisite slots and socket to fit what I have.
Quote:Edit: Just another addition.. Really, the budget isn't quite so strict. I don't want to spend an enormous amount - but I would like to try and improve my rig to the point that I can record gameplay in various games with a fairly stable framerate. Or would I need a peripheral for that, ideally? I've heard a bit about capture cards.
Wow, video capture cards: blast from the past! I remember a friend being all excited about getting one of those in 1994.
Most game-video recording is done now with Fraps software. You can try it on the machine you have now.
(*P55A gives USB 3.0 capability and SATA 6 Gb/Sec, but uses half of the available PCIe lanes otherwise used for the graphics card to enable it.) -
Quote:The information we have so far hints strongly towards CoX GR being more GPU dependent then CPU dependent. That GTX 275 should handle GR Ultra Mode just fine according to Positron's post in the Ultra Mode Shopping Guide thread. Positron just mentioned pairing the graphics card with a "decent" CPU. Unless you're bound and determined to upgrade for that unstated other game, I'd stand pat for now.The CPU.. The main reason I'm looking to upgrade this is for another game, actually, which is touted as 'very CPU intensive' because a lot of GPU functions are apparently off-loaded to the CPU instead. My reasoning was that if a fairly new-ish game is going to eat up that much CPU, then I might want to upgrade in preparation for CoX's graphical update with Going Rogue, as well.
-
Quote:You should see dramatically better than 15 fps.Yeah, I currently have an ATI card on my Dell that I've learned how to mess around with after four years of playing CoH! heh
I think I could stomach the occasional hiccup for a little bit until I bought more RAM.... As long as I got more than 15 fps, it would still be a massive improvement over my current gameplay. lol -
Quote:Not...exactly the kind of business I'd expect Nvidia to want as their high-profile core market. I guess that's better than announcing a new defeat though, since their Oakridge National Labs contract for a Fermi-based supercomputer fell through.Original Source here: http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/l...s-press-event/
If it eventually moves beyond the luxury car market, and Nvidia can hold onto the deal, that might actually be really good for them since Volkswagon bought Toyota recently.
I didn't see anything about Fermi in that article. Are they saving that for another presentation?
Quote:(cough:Eyefinity can do Stereoscopic 3D too) -
Quote:Likely you're going to get the occasional hickup in framerate when available ram is full and the system has to use the HD swap file to move graphics textures around. You might be able to manage that some by using the /unloadgfx command to dump everything but the textures the game is immediately using. Just standing there looking at the game, you're not going to see any downgrade in appearance.I was also concerned about the motherboard but couldn't seem to get what I wanted on any of the other configurators without going over my budget. But, I might just have to deal with it to avoid problems and get something a little more future handy....
As for the power supply, I went higher because it was the same price as the 550 and gave me wiggle room in case I wanted to add more down the line. Not that I'm really likely to, but I didn't want to have to mess with replacing a power supply again if I didn't need to!
I think I might shift over to the one you've suggested with a couple of changes to lessen the hit of my budget! If I did that, I would go down to 2G memory for now, and add more in a few months when I had some money, and probably take the 320GB HD.
If I went down to 2GB RAM on that, would I have an unwanted drop in performance? The only intense thing I do is play COH and watch movies online.
Do remember to look through Bill Z Bubba's ATI issues sticky thread. You'll want to set AA to run through the driver menu rather than have CoX handle it and disable water effects. All of that will go away when GR hits though, and the 5770 will stand you in much better stead for the future than a current Nvidia card will. -
Quote:The nForce 7xx chipsets were supposed to have HD corruption issues of some sort. I don't know whether they ever fixed the issue in BIOS, but Nvidia no longer makes them. I don't see another motherboard option on their website either. I tried poking around to see if they had another motherboard option in one of their other lines, but the only one I found was an even older G41/ICH7 board in their dual core configurator. That makes me think they aren't buying Socket 775 boards anymore and are just offering what they have in stock that didn't sell before.Motherboard [SLI] ASUS P5N-D -- Nvidia nForce 750i SLI Chipset w/7.1 Sound, Gb LAN, S-ATA Raid, USB 2.0, IEEE-1394, Dual PCI-E MB - EPU Technology
Quote:Power Supply 700 Watt -- Power Supply - SLI Ready
The ATI 5770 will give you full settings in CoX currently, and is likely to give you Ultra Mode in GR at *some* resolution. The 5770 is roughly equivalent to the (more expensive) GTX 260, which is in the middle of Positron's spectrum from the Ultra Mode Shopping Guide thread.
Piddling around on their site attempting to find a different motherboard, I found that you could get a $971 i5-750 based system with much the same components:
Case ( NZXT Lexa Blackline Gaming Tower Case - w/ Blue Light )
Processor ( Intel® Core i5 750 Processor (4x 2.66GHz/8MB L3 Cache) )
Processor Cooling ( [Free Upgrade] Liquid CPU Cooling System w/ 120mm Radiator [SOCKET-1156] )
Memory ( 4 GB [2 GB X2] DDR3-1333 Memory Module - Corsair or Major Brand )
Video Card ( ATI Radeon HD 5770 - 1GB - Single Card )
Video Card Brand ( Major Brand Powered by ATI or NVIDIA )
Motherboard ( ASUS P7P55D LE -- Intel P55 Chipset CrossFire Supported w/7.1 Sound, Dual-Channel DDR3, Gb LAN, S-ATA Raid, USB 2.0, Dual PCI-Ex16 MB )
Power Supply ( 550 Watt -- Power Supply )
Primary Hard Drive ( 500 GB HARD DRIVE -- 16M Cache, 7200 RPM, 3.0Gb/s - Single Drive )
Optical Drive ( 22X Dual Format/Double Layer DVD±R/±RW + CD-R/RW Drive - Black )
2nd Optical Drive ( None )
Sound Card ( 3D Premium Surround Sound Onboard )
Network Card ( Onboard LAN Network (Gb or 10/100) )
Operating System ( Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium + [Free 60-Day !!!] Microsoft Office 2007(Word, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint, Access ....) - 64-Bit )
Warranty ( Standard Warranty Service - Standard 3-Year Limited Warranty + Lifetime Technical Support )
That's $83 over your stated budget, but the i5-750 is a noticeable upgrade from the older chips and would give you a current-design motherboard and RAM rather than one that uses a socket type that isn't developed-for any longer. You might try looking in that configurator to see if there's something you like better than what you have ordered now. -
Quote:Well, you kind of can't for that price. The reason being that you not only need to upgrade the processor and motherboard, you'll also need new DDR3 RAM for one of the new chips. You could buy a low-ball CPU and maybe squeeze everything into that price, but it would be with another socket LGA 775 chip and wouldn't be much/any of an "upgrade".So, it's really just a 'small' upgrade.. compared to what I've already done to the thing, anyhow. My current setup goes as follows:
The motherboard and processor are the only parts that I've yet to replace/upgrade.. so, I'm looking to do those two.. but I'm really not quite sure where to start. The I7 CPUs seem to be the big thing, now - but awfully expensive. I'd like to try and shoot for a balance between significantly improved and just-around-$300-total for this venture.
If you're willing to spend a bit more, the i5-750 is a $200 processor that does most of what the i7s do, with the exception of the hyper-threading capability that gives you 8 virtual cores on 4 physical ones. If you're not going to have any applications that require 8 cores, the i5-750 is probably your best value/price compromise. Below the i5-750 you start to get into dual cores with an on-chip GPU that is barely enough to push spreadsheets around a screen.
The older E8500 3.16 GHz dual core and Q9400 2.66 GHz quad core both cost $180. The i5-750 has a base clock speed of 2.66 GHz, but when two or fewer cores are in use it will overclock itself to above 3 GHz. On top of that, it has better power-management capabilities than the older Core 2 chips. So you get all the flexibility of the Q9400 with all of the potential speed of the E8500 in one chip.
You could fit the chip on an MSI P55-CD53 for $115. If you used this you wouldn't be able to do SLI or Crossfire, but it doesn't sound like you intend that anyway. A more substantial Socket 1156 motherboard with be somewhere north of $130.
With those two bits you'll want 4 GB of DDR3 1066 or 1333 RAM, which will cost you another ~$100.
So you could fit a processor and motherboard into your budget, keeping your old RAM, but it would be one of the older Core 2 chips. -
The Jump Pack from the Good vs Evil Edition in-game items is a duration-toggle. That means it will function like a toggle for 30 sec (unless deactivated earlier) and then has a 2.5 min recharge. However, if you zone before the duration expires, the timer will reset and you will have a full 30 sec of buff time again. To maximize the boost you get from the Jump Pack, activate it just under the maximum distance from a train/ferry/etc you can travel in the 30 sec duration, zone before it expires, and then continue on your way with the buff refreshed and still active in your destination area.
All of the various Phase Shift powers in the game are also duration toggles, Except for the Ethereal Shift craftable temp power. Unlike the others, Ethereal Shift is a five-use Click power that will give you a full thirty seconds of Phase time once activated.
What this means is (and I have no idea why this is still obscure information after it's been in the game so many years =P) that the Phase effect will stay up even if you have no Endurance in your bar...such as after an Unstoppable Crash. Even if you're in heavy combat and likely won't clear all enemies in three minutes, you can use one of the crashing super-armor powers without fear if you have that Temp. When you notice the Tier-9 icon blinking, you can smack the Ethereal Shift button and you now have 19-29 seconds to get your trousers back up before re-entering the fight.
-
Quote:Then there's people like Walter Bell, who had a thirty-five year career as an elephant hunter up to 1930. He shot over 1,000 elephants in that time, most with 6.7 mm, 160 grain bullets.Ignoring for the moment that 1890 was well before 1946, there is a matter of portability. A double rifle, fully loaded still came in at rifle size and under 12 pounds (5 kilos) and can get off two shots faster than any action in use at the time. Sure it's overkill, but when dealing with African game, it's not overkill by much, and definitely not at the time.
They needed something light and fast that could still put any living creature on it's butt without worrying about shot placement. Bigger was the answer.
The thread's gone on a slight tangent here, but if anyone's interested in this kind of historical big game hunting, I'd recommend searching up a copy of Peter Hathaway Capstick's Death in the Silent Places or Death in the Long Grass. The former is about larger-than-life hunters of the 1800s and 1900s. The latter is about the big game animals themselves and smaller but still lethal creatures that would be encountered with them; it has chapters with titles like "Leopard", "Cape Buffalo", and "Crocodile".
Capstick himself was a professional African hunter and the books are very well written; showing evidence of someone who spent years telling stories around a campfire for entertainment. -
One of these.
The AC Freezer 7 Pro is the bare minimum; it would be at best "adequate". The Xigmatek uses a direct-touch heatpipe arrangement, which some people don't like and others rave about. The Zalman will require a little more fiddling to get it on the board, but will be more secure once it's there. I would have recommended the Scythe Mugen-2 as first choice, but it appears to be out of stock at the moment =/.
Whichever you pick, do measure to be sure it will fit inside your case. -
Quote:It is and it isn't. It's got some fairly serious design limitations (like a given section being "one use"), but for what it does do it's a very cheap way of upgrading the armor on an existing tank. A lot of the old T-72s still in service in Eastern Europe are now coated in blocks of the stuff. The new T-90s in Russia come factory equipped with it. And I believe the US Marine Corp's M60s were covered in it during Desert Storm.I've actually heard of double shaped charges, myself. There was a programme on Discovery about the history of tanks which mentioned this, but it didn't leave me with the impression that those were practical or accepted. Then again, it was rather very old (maybe 10 years old now) and it didn't leave me with the impression that reactive armour itself was a feasible concept.
-
Budget, noise level, are you willing to remove the motherboard again to install a cooler, and do you have tall heat-spreaders on your RAM?