HelinCarnate

IMO this part is actually a better example Billz

An exaggeration is a lie btw. Example, "I caught a 2 foot long trout that weighed 12 pounds." But if the fish in question was 1'10" and weighed 11lb 14oz and the person making the statement knew this information, they are deliberately presenting false information. Now if they said about 2 feet and almost 12 pounds it would not be a lie.

Sure it may not be a "big" lie but rather a slight exaggeration. That does not change the fact that it is still a lie.

By admitting you exaggerate then stating you never lie you just lied.

Finally a reasonable objection.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Just because people complain about something does not mean it needs to be fixed. My sister-in-law for example complains that she never has enough money. She does not have a job, she collects money from the state for "disability" because she was able to convince a doctor she is bi-polar. It did take her 3 tries with 3 different doctors until she finally figured out the answers to the questions the Dr was looking for to make the diagnosis. She has not made any effort in the last 6 years to even apply for a job because she claims it gives her a panic attack. All she should get is enough to keep her from starving and a enough to keep a roof over her head. Yet she still complains about never having enough money. To me (and hopefully the majority of others), that is not a problem that needs to be fixed by others just because she is complaining about it.

You have still made no attempt to say what the issue is other than vague complaints about end use. What specific set has a problem? What AT is underperforming due to excessive endurance use?

Oh that is even better than my Rad/Dark suggestion. Arctic air, shiver, ice slick and glacier all have no damage. Jack frost is toeing the line since he does the damage and not you. And even doing no damage you would still remain busy by debuffing and with CCs. Just about any secondary would be good to pair with Ice. Just stay away from the stuff that does damage and you are set. Sure it may not fall under the technical term pacifist, but that would be a very effective toon without ever causing damage to anyone. Granted they would be even more effective if they did cause damage but that is not what you are shooting for.

The issue here is that you see a problem and the majority of others do not. Just because one person thinks there is a problem does not mean that it is true.

Example. Joe thinks that it is a problem that his blaster is so squishie and thinks he should be albe to have a tanker primary as his secondary with the tanker modifiers. Most others think that is a bad idea.

The sets are balanced for endurance use. Both the blaster and the defender sets have the same power, the same endurance use. The difference is the damage modifier for the AT. There has never been and probably never will be a DPE balance between the different ATs. While a blaster mostly does just damage, a defender can use less endurance and end up causing the whole team to do much higher damage as a result. In effect the damage that the defender caused with his/her buffs and debuffs per unit of endurance, on teams, can end up being much higher than a blasters DPE.

And why should it? All this is meant to do is make low level play easier on the blue bar. If you can't make a build that is not an end hog, the problem is you, not the game. The devs have never stated that their intention was to make the blue bar irrelevant. If you have end issues before, you will have end issues in the future. This is mainly a QOL change, not a buff except for the few that can manage just fine without stamina.

Whoever said it should?

The baseline for running speed and jumping has increased. Deal with it. If you insist on running slower than everyone else for your “concept” then use the walk button or don’t slot any enhancements in the power.

And there it is. If they do that, they may as well just remove endurance from the game. Once again, the goal was to make the low levels easier on the blue bar, not to make it irrelevant. What you are asking for is to make it irrelevant except for extreme situations. Not going to happen, nor should it.

If it is the same brute on a different map all that tells us is what map gives better inf/min with that brute. It tells us nothing about the brute itself.

If you are trying to figure out what farm is best for you then yes, count your own load times when making your calculations. However when trying to determine what build does the most damage using load times throws off the number. So what if person A has a great computer and his load time is 10 seconds and player B has a crap computer and his load time is 2 min?

When comparing 2 different sets with 2 different people, all other variables should be removed.

You first stated you got max tickets in 5 min. Then when somone posted a better time you said it was done in half the time. So either the 5 min time was a lie or the 2:30 min time was a lie.

This shows a history of lying.

So person A has a crappy graphics card and a slow computer but can kill lots of stuff much faster than person B. But person B has a super fast computer with great connection and makes more per min overall only because of the faster load times.

So who has the better build?

If load times were static then sure, include them. Since they are not you should only use the time from the door right before you move to the time the mish is over and you can either click on exit or get back to the door if you are going to reset.

There is also no reason to pvp to get a recipie either. You could try to defeat others but if you are not any good and it is a bit challenging, why bother. I think Ill just solo for a few weeks.

Yet you can buy pvp recipies with A merits and purples. It is not like HOs are that much better that there can only be 2 ways of getting them.