Chrome_Family

I agree with all this, espically turing Propel into a AOE.. I think Dimension Shift needs to be reworked all together.. maybe turn that to a AOE Propel and keep single target propel for only small items to toss (Lamps, etc) and big stuff (Cars, statues, etc) for the AOE propel

That would be within the theme.. then again I am biased I hate dimension shift as is currently.

Live for something, or die for nothing?

oh wait...!

/sarcasm (For those that don't understand that the above was a joke)

Ditto I can't log into either server

yeah this was one I would buy on DVD

Loved it

Yeah it was, we're talking about it on the later pages of this thread
http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showt...=265009&page=4

(starting on page 3)

But I will copy what I said over there..


If you're a fan of God Of War or Conan go see this movie you won't be dissapointed.

Then the world is complete!

This movie was entertaining, very god of war-ish. If anyone is a conan fan go see this movie you WON'T be disapointed.

Yeah I wasn't sure in my post earlier, Its why I said it sounded like him. I am curious who is was though..

This movie was fun AND Entertaining BY CROM!!!

hell yes LOLOL okay when he stuck his finger through that noseless face and the guy peed.. I damn near LOLed.. what was your take?

So many innovative ways to die in this flick LOL

Yep well worth it, no movie of this nature will get a high rating from critics (Blood, violence, sex, nudity, lots of epic fighting, inovative killing, and very little dialog from the main actor) LOL screw them, the movie is awesome.

The fight scenes remind me of god of war..

Rotten Tomatoes also gave:

Superman Returns a 76% (most consider this movie total fail and yet there is the review)

Batman (1989) a 71% (while Batman returns got a 79%) which wasn't as good as the first one.

But we are supposed to believe that Superman Returns was better than it too? Also Watchmen was only 64% too on that site, and many nerd fans worship that movie as the perfect comic book adaptation. According to Rotten tomatoes... Superman Returns was better than that too! total hog wash I say.


IS the transformers series a failure too?

Transformers 1 = 57%
Transformers 2 = 20%
Transformers 3 = 36%

each movie made over 400mill.. and was a summer block buster success each time.

same goes for the last two pirates of the carribean flicks.. it ranked 33% & 45% and was still one of the biggest block busters of the year each time..

Same goes for Blade 1 (55%) and Blade 2 (59%)

in short..(I can go on and on) that site shouldn't be the end all be all that some of us make it out to be. Different strokes for different folks... I think people care less and less about what Rottentomatoes thinks based on what movies make the most money every year.(see above for some examples) I wish people would stop using it as a measuring stick and form their OWN opinion after seeing it.

the Arnold version of Conan was never the version in the comics.. what happend to respecting the source material people? we (Most of the Comic Book internet fans) are looking like hypocrites here.. we claim to want source material all the time.. but now it seems like people want this movie to be like the arnold movies instead of the true version of the comic book.

Its like no one here ever read the comic from its creater Robert E Howard.
His version was gritty when he first wrote the book..

Arnold killed the whole Conan franchise with his dumb acting, he made the character one-dimensional. In the first film he had a better supporting cast to make it almost watchable, the 2nd film had nothing and both flopped!

The "real Conan" from the novels isn't an ancient Irishman, that's a common misinterpretation. He's from a "Mythical" race from a "Mythical" race that resembles the Proto Celts and is bronzed in his skin from many travels from his youth, blue eyes and black hair.

His race settles to a "Mythical" land where Northen Ireland and Scotland will later be after the Destruction of "Mythical Atlantis".

Despite the vast lengths Robert Howard went through to not assign his character to any place or region definitive to our map of the known world, people keep calling him an ancient Irishman due to the mythical setting of where his people would later settle, not where they came from nor the fact his physical description is not a-typical Irish whatsoever. Howard simply describes him as big, muscled, black haired and blue eyed, wearing whatever clothing suited where he was wandering and stronger than any man although not taller (Howard later described him as 6'0 when he was 15years old so in adulthood anything from 6'2 to 6'6). Sullen and brooding in expression and sometimes wearing a horned helmet and agile as a panther despite his great size.

Arnold isn't tanned, never was as Conan and although blue eyed has brown hair and actually 5'10 in height instead of the 6'2 he constantly lies about being for impressions sake. Heavily muscled Arnie is but agile as a panther...? No chance, Arnie is far from fighting physique.

Jason Moma is tanned, isn't blue eyed but has black hair (browns in the sun) and is 6'4 and has bulked up but not over the top so as to remain agile (agile as a panther remains to be seen) Has sullen features to replicate the brooding aspect of Conan.

In short, Jason has more in common with the character description than Arnie did plus he can act which Arnie could never do.

Frank Frazetta has pretty much influence the whole look of Conan in art with this one picture that hits the brooding look on the nail! But other artists today kinda get closer to the Robert Howard description.


Jason has the look in the face of the sullen, brooding Conan that Arnie never could perform despite his great physique, nice costumes and props.


Arnolds problem is his goofy acting which leads to him pulling clueless faces like this no matter what character he's playing..



While Jason as an actor will keep that crap in check hopefully and stay in character for more like this..




To attempt to capture the essence of this..


So in truth they're getting more right than wrong with this latest version and it's looking a lot more like the world Howard describes with the creatures and characters they've been unveiling in photos. The production looks good so far and we should wait and see how well they deliver before shooting it down as another prop fest like the Arnold films that literally flopped massively at the box office and just became cult faves for fanboys due to Arnolds popularity despite the lack of quality in the features.

The Conan from the books looks a lot more to be given some justice with Jason Momoa, the clever, cunning warrior who is huge but fast and athletic and can read many languages and has a sense of humour unlike the way he's done in those terrible Marvel comics and Arnie's muscle-headed version.


This new film hopefully will portray the smarter cunning Conan from the books and not Arnies dumb version.