Brillig

Legend
  • Posts

    873
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CyberGlitch View Post
    There's a mighty fine line between hero and vigilante.
    In the real world it's more than a bunch of tip missions.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kyuuen View Post
    Andy Belford is looking for a job, while anonymous NCSoft reps still get a paycheck.

    Very sad.
    What's even sadder is how willing you are to hate on someone who had less to do with the closure than Andy did.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Evil_Legacy View Post
    what's ongoing?
    Let me summarize: TonyV says "Keep on fighting, this is not bad news."
    VV says "NCSoft are liars, the campaign is working."

    Oh, and this will make you laugh - a bunch of people are repeating a rumor that Trion offered 80 million for CoH.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lazarillo View Post
    There aren't really any other practical solutions, however, for people who want to play the game. And really, who would be unhappy, except NCsoft? And really really, who cares what NCSoft thinks?
    As I noted, it's against the EULA. Whether it's legally enforceable or not is another matter, but as a matter of integrity, I like to try to abide by my agreements.

    People who are loudly proclaiming to be heroes might want to do the same.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by gameboy1234 View Post
    Reverse engineering is not illegal. However, there's still no guarantee that they'll be able to pull it off. If they're sued, will they have the money (and time) to even fight a legal battle?
    Pretty sure it's against the EULA - while I don't have the CoH EULA handy, it's been a standard feature of every game EULA I've seen.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by shadow35 View Post
    "Reverse engineering" = illegal private server, something I seriously doubt would be allowed on Kickstarter for oh, about a zillion different reasons.
    Which is one reason why I think the whole Titan effort is toxic.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
    Anyways... After the initial announcement, I kind of considered maybe going to CO or STO as a new place to play. But then I realized, the same thing will probably happen there too. It's an inherent risk in the medium. You make characters, build them up and get attached to them, and then sooner or later they just all go poof, because the publisher has decided to shut the game down.
    It's unfortunate you feel that way. I suppose that everyone sees it differently, but I've never lost one of my characters, even those in games like Tabula Rasa. After all, it's my imagination that created these characters, and my imagination that fleshed them out over the limited feedback that a game can give to you. They live in my head, not on any server - so no publisher has the power to take them away from me.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by shadow35 View Post
    Yeah, but how many people even KNOW about that petition? Kickstarter gets millions of hits from everywhere; everyone interested in funding indie games all convenes on that one place. Change.org is hardly somewhere that gamers go en masse every day just for the sake of it, lol.

    And even if PS did manage to pull in a couple million in Kickstarter funding, the very nature of that funding, *coming completely from their fan base and not pro publishers,* might turn the heads of potential publishers enough for them to want to be involved. After all, Kickstarter really isn't profitable for those donating; they just really believe in the particular "cause" they're giving to enough to want to help it get off the ground. Publishers and private investment firms *would* actually see profit from the player base, once the game is released.
    A very unlikely scenario for so many reasons.

    Not least of which is that you can't put together a Kickstarter project under those guidelines. "We need to raise $2 million so hopefully a publisher decides to give us even more money" is not a valid project.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Starsman View Post
    Dont waste your time, they are not actually interested. They never were (NCSoft.)

    If they cared, at minimum the servers would had been sustainable without a dev team. I hope no one comes with the "better off shut down than without updates" would have been the biggest b.s. that can be tossed at us right now.
    It would be better off shut down than without updates.

    There, you may now go ballistic.

    But really, do you know what happens to revenue if there are no updates? Does the phrase "asymptotically approaches zero" mean anything to you?
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Minotaur View Post
    Did I say he made an offer, he made an enquiry and didn't even get a reply, they never found out whether it was sensible or not. Hence my questioning their claims to have exhausted all avenues.
    Okay, I get it now. You're a literalist. Since it's impossible to exhaust all avenues, NCSoft is clearly lying.

    "Sending an enquiry" is meaningless. I could do that right now. The question is, is it credible? Any query from me would clearly not be. As for Mr. X, who knows? Unless his name was Gabe, it probably wasn't.

    And how was said query sent? If it actually was a serious attempt to reach out, it would be very ironic if it got sent to one of the electronic or physical addresses people were busy spamming.

    Generally stuff like this happens between people who already know each other on some level. Or an intermediary makes an introduction.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by _eeek_ View Post
    It's typical PR talk for "shut up" because they don't like the noise.

    I say fight. Make MORE noise!

    And let me add, if you want to give up, then GO. Stop posting negative stuff, just GO, already!
    Actually, the most negative things being posted are coming from the save COH side...
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by shadow35 View Post
    I'd like to know if the Paragon Studios team is planning on staying together and starting a new MMO project, Kickstarter or otherwise.

    Obsidian raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in a matter of hours from Kickstarter, after sharing their plans for another isometric RPG. I think they may have hit a million in a few days but I'd have to doublecheck.

    Kickstarter may be a fad, but it's a fad in full swing right now. Let's hope PS can take advantage of it in some way and strike while the iron's hot.

    Edit after Googling: Okay, Obsidian + Kickstarter = 2.2 million dollars, bay-bee!

    http://thedroidguy.com/2012/10/proje...als-announced/

    We can do that.
    2.2 million is a drop in the bucket. If you're talking about building a new MMO, I think you'd need to be talking about ten times that amount.

    Also, I doubt that you'd even get 2.2 million. PE has over 50,000 backers. Only 20,000 people even signed the CoH online petition.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TargetOne View Post
    BUT, we have to remember that STO was never intended to be a Starfleet simulator. And its players, like those of any MMO, would scream bloody murder if the ability to create ships and/or uniforms that were completely unique was ever taken away. Can you imagine what CoH would have been like if EVERYBODY were required to wear one of a handful of basic Longbow uniforms, without deviation or accessorizing?
    Yeah, that would be bad. It would almost be like TSW!


    Kidding. Sort of. It still boggles my mind that everyone in TSW has the same height and body. And then PvP costumes...

    Okay, not kidding.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Minotaur View Post
    Either they are flat out lying, or the guy that runs a small studio and didn't get a reply to his enquiry is (can't remember which set of boards I saw this on atm, if I find it, will link it).
    Uh, what?

    I guess what you're implying is that some guy made them an offer? Is there any reason to believe said offer was a) serious and b) reasonable? I'm guessing it was neither.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
    He's implying that GG is living in a fantasy world where the game is saved.
    He's at least partially right...
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Starsman View Post
    Funny you say that: at lest 3 games in that list have changed ownership. Some of them several times.
    Not aware that any of them sold at a premium.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Starsman View Post
    Yes, and all of those are such hot properties that a day doesn't go by that I don't hear of some company attempting to buy one of them...
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Turjan View Post
    Ahem...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQtU_fYe6gE

    meme stuff, see - Teh Interwebs is full of it
    In his defense though, the only that is more prevalent on the Internet than memes is people being completely and utterly wrong.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
    That was the Japanese. The Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. The Germans bombed London.
    That's actually a quote from a movie.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Chad Gulzow-Man View Post
    From what I've heard about Guild Wars 2's account security, a few hundred people probably have that info already anyway.
    If you're on the internet, you can hear that about every single site's security.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by I Burnt The Toast View Post
    Already uninstalled - sorry.
    That doesn't destroy your stuff, just give him your login credentials.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Venture View Post
    What I expected, and frankly they would have been better off saying nothing.
    Really? You'd rather be left believing that negotiations were still ongoing?
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BlueBattler View Post
    If talks are over, then I'd like to know what caused them to fail ...
    Maybe they learned that people were working on an emulator...
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scarlet Shocker View Post
    Because there could have been a nice tasty revenue stream - with nothing for them to do but count the money. They could have quite happily licensed the game and left the rest to a new team and taken a revenue stream for sitting on their collective arses!
    This is all inference on your part.

    You don't know how much the revenue stream would be.
    You don't know how much the potential write-off that they would lose would be.
    You don't know what the value of the IP is.
    You don't know what the brand exposure is.

    Based on the analysis you've put up so far, it makes complete sense for George Lucas to license a Star Wars game for $2.00. After all, it's free money, isn't it?
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scarlet Shocker View Post
    NCSoft have just said to us, and more importantly from a business point of view to their shareholders:
    And you know this is bad for the shareholders.... how?

    It's not surprising that this community isn't taken seriously by NCSoft when it consistently insists on making sh*t up.