Agonus

Legend
  • Posts

    889
  • Joined

  1. So I want to overhaul the concept of my magic origin brute from a kid that turns into a Black Adam homage to a kid that's a monster based shapeshifter. Also turning him Rogue in the process, and I plan on doing a name change too.

    Thing is I'd like to do a one night mini RP event as a catalyst. And this is where some other players will, ah.. come into play.

    I'm looking for a magically inclined hero, (or group of heroes) to conduct a ritual that will exorcize the corrupting spirit from the kid ("accidentally" reincarnating said spirit in Praetoria as well). Doesn't need to be elaborate or anything, just something magicy that can get rid of the corrupting spirit that's influencing the kid, and allow me to use a "it's magic!" hand wave of sorts to change the nature of the kid's powers.

    Anyone interested? Any questions? Reply here or contact me @the new black
  2. Heh. A photographer for the casting agency who took my pic said I was her "favorite evil villain look" of the day. :3

    Didn't realize filming was actually from July 28th to Aug 21st though. Rumor is that it'll mainly be involving Heinz Field. They also need a -lot- of people, so there's still plenty of opportunity to get in on it.

    But yeah... so begins the waiting game...
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BlackSun17 View Post
    Apparently this is the actual cover (still with tattoo):

    I was hoping Robin's cape would just be modeled after feathers, a la the last version of the CSA's Owlman. This whole "Lookit me, I'm Falcon!" thing just looks silly.
  4. Vaguely on topic, I finally got around to starting the modern era stuff with Eccleston. So I'll get back to you guys in a few months after I catch up. >.>
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    ...Emma Frost's scenes all played to what I know about her character (though the whole squeezing a lady wrapped in diamonds to get her to change back is kinda dumb I dunno exactly how her powers work, but that is still dumb). I have a feeling though that this was more due to the actress than the writer... I mean her main scenes were walking into a place in underwear and giving a psychic lapdance...

    In fact, thinking back on it, the Female characters were all pretty silent and almost always half naked or completely naked, so getting Emma Frost accurate to the point the movie did is no large feet considering she doesn't have to talk be clothed for most of it.

    And now that I think about the movie really gave off an anti-feminist vibe with all the nakedness, lack of females talking, the talking of not accepting based on looks, angel saying the way she didn't like the way the guards looked at her... it seems to me that the entire movie centered around how they should look or want to look rather than this issue that they're dangerous to themselves and others and either that new paradigm has to be accepted or curtailed...
    I've said that Jones was underwhelming as Frost, though whether she's to be blame, or the writers just utterly ignored the character's verbal manipulation skill and snark is another matter.

    That aside, from the beginning, part of the idea with the Hellfire Club, in the [spooky fingers] all mighty canon of the comics[/spooky fingers], was that the women in the group dressed in lingerie while the men wore the old timey costumes. Barring the occasional pantsuit, Frost has largely stuck to a similarly revealing style of dress ever since. Also, miniskirts and beatle boots were a style of the times of the FC era.

    As far as Mystique goes, one of the plot points is that she was upset that Charles could walk around in public and no one would know he was a mutant. She, on the other hand, could not walk around in her normal, blue skinned form. It even seemed to bother Charles, who also encouraged her to stick to the blonde form. Erik told her to be herself. It's part of what drew her to McCoy at first, he also had a -physical- mutation even if it wasn't as glaring as hers.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Inazuma View Post
    They filmed in Chicago before, didn't they? I wonder why the change.
    I'm pretty sure it's more of an additional location sorta thing, than changing filming from Chicago to Pittsburgh.
  7. Virtueverse appears to be down at the moment as the link in my sig to the profile for Agonus isn't working.

    That aside, I'll be looking for you guys in game to join with said character.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Residentx10 View Post
    ...- Mystique - Did Jennifer Lawrence look kind of chunky in the film? I know she's young and probably still has girlish features/babyfat but when I read interviews with her, she just seemed more intelligent. I wondered what all the hoopla/hype surrounding her was about? In the credits, I noticed they assigned 11 people to her for the makeup bit.
    Chunky?!

    Lawrence's rounder babyface more pronounced in First Class but in some pics online she doesn't look to have that at all. Regardless, I found her to be pleasantly curvey. 'Specially in the full shot of her standing there as blueskin Mystique. /e drool

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Residentx10 View Post
    - Banshee - Every time I saw Sean Cassidy I couldn't help but think of Ronald Weasley. I'm sorry
    Agreed there. Nice to know I wasn't the only one thinking that. >.<
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by PDXUnder View Post
    ... I hope in the next installment we see some Mastermind...
    This actually came up in the conversation with my friend afterwards about the villains. Azazel was there for the link to Nightcrawler. Riptide/Whirlwind was there to... allow for some wind cgi. I'd like to have them just run with the Hellfire Club and use Harry Leland or Von Roehm or Selene, though she was probably supposed to be in the background of "entertainment" scene in the club, considering the sheer number of Easter eggs in the movie.

    Considering Mystique's shapeshifting and all of Xavier and Emma's telepathy tricks, I think Mastermind would have been sorta redundant, y'know?


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Acemace View Post
    ...
    I saw it with my wife and we liked it, though we both sort of groaned during the flying fight scenes at the end between flying pixie tattoo girl and Banshee, it looked, goofy.
    ...
    I thought Banshee looked fine, it was Angel's awkward I'm-stuck-in-a-harness-and-they're-trying-to-make-it-look-like-I'm-flying pose that hurt that scene for me.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
    Even positing the possibility of cosmetic surgery, Emma in the movie was a bit on the...mature...side. She'd be (probably) in her 70's around the time of X-1.
    ...
    As far as Emma Frost goes, Jones was a little underwhelming, yeah. Visually, I have no complaints, mind you.

    If memory serves, around the beginning of Generation X, Emma was strongly implied to be in her mid to late 30's. From that point I took her to be that age, until a recent comic where she whines on panel to the effect of "26 isn't that old!"
  10. Overall, very good. Fassbender and McAvoy were great leads, and I was pleasantly surprised by Jennifer Lawrence as young Mystique.

    Loved the "**** Off" cameo too. Hee.

    That aside, I have a question about a particular scene.

    Here there be SPOILERS!

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    When Erik and Xavier confront Shaw at the end, and then they finally get the helmet off of Shaw, the events right after that just struck me as a little odd. Xavier has a line about freezing Shaw in place, and about how Shaw is hard to hold. Sooo... from the point that Erik pulls out the coin, is Xavier still holding Shaw in place? If so, does that mean that Xavier basically kept Shaw defenseless against Erik? Or is it possible that the newly epiphany-ed and stronger with his powers Erik held Shaw in place during that scene?
    __________________
    Tales of Judgment
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Veritech View Post
    Another thought occurs at this point, but given the relaunch and fans attitudes in general how this will be affecting sales between now and September. After all, if this is going to be a major reboot, why bother picking up or getting interested in any new titles or stories starting up between now and then? Sure, it's only 3 months which doesn't seem like much for the company (sure, so maybe 52 new titles will recoup any loss... right), but this seems like the Comic retailers are going to be taking it in the shorts, and if this relaunch or whatever doesn't hit it off and BIG, isn't DC essentially helping kill the direct market?
    To my knowledge, there aren't any new arcs starting in any DCU title between now and then. Just about every current arc's been timed to end by the end of Flashpoint.

    Don't know about any new minis starting now and then though, but it seems highly unlikely.

    As for bothering to get the books between now and then anyway? To find out how the respective arcs end.
  12. Word is DC has been working on and building up to this, line-wide (notice that pretty much every major DCU title is ending its storyline just in time for the post Flashpoint shenanigans to kick in) for at least 2 years. That's hardly a knee-jerk reaction to declining sales.
  13. Now as I understand, the ascot "piece" in question is the permanent part of the jackets?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AzureSkyCiel View Post
    Point, it's just always been a personal joke of mine.
    Heh. Fair enough.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
    I doubt it as well. The current execs in charge are this odd mix of loving the Silver Age but having no concept of how to write to emulate or pay homage to it.

    And sure, I'm all for bringing new readers on board, but you have to get them to stick around to become older readers. The older generation are there for a reason, and chopping and changing your comics, desperately hoping you'll hit on a formula is not the way to go. Quality is, and always will be.
    ...
    As I said in the other thread on the Flashpoint reboot, DC, as they are now, are -not- bringing in enough new readers. The older generation fans that DC has largely been catering to the last 5 or so years are still walking away. And DC also hasn't really managed to successfully do much of anything with the main DCU comics to bring in enough new readers to make up for it.

    I could be wrong, but last I knew one of DC's biggest selling comics recently was the Superman: Earth One GN, which essentially ultimatized the Superman mythos. Seems to be that with the Flashpoint reboot, DC decided to try something similar to that on their entire line.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Wooden_Replica View Post
    ...
    3) You didn't have anything like the everyman's role/ comedy relief of the red coast pair, or the pirate pair, the closest you had here, was the little side story of the priest and the mermaid which seemed tacked on
    Couldn't disagree more. I utterly despised those stock Disney cliche/trope characters in the other PoTC movies. The movies don't need bumbling comic relief with all the humor and wordplay they can pull off with the other characters like Sparrow, Biggs, and Barbossa.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by AzureSkyCiel View Post
    ...
    On your second point, I've always suspected that the devs don't want wings and long coats on one character for fear of this becoming City of Devart.
    I doubt that has anything to do with it. If you -really- want to pull off something like that, as I did when I was goofing around to see if I could make Castiel, you can do wings and the longer base coats, like the Baron coat.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    McAvoy sounds like he's quite willing to roll up his sleeves and get into the role of Prof. X (certainly to judge by this recent interview).
    McAvoy seems to be a bigger geek than I ever figured. Dude was surprisingly excited to try to sneak Picard's catchphrases into his lines in First Class.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    Brown is extremely popular as is cain. the reason Cain isn't as popular right now is she isn't in anything.
    I'll give you that Brown and Cain have their share of fans. But to call them "extremely popular"? What's Batman then? Ungodly popular? If Brown and Cain were as popular as you imply, they'd each have their own best selling ongoings and minis.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    BoP has been relaunched 1 time and it was only "canceled" for the bat familly hiatus thing last year or the year before last... so it wasn't ever really canceled or relaunched.
    Just once? Really? I seem to stand corrected.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    Yeah they do, but then it matters what you mean by younger generation so i'll drop that.
    They way I see it, there's either the new blood like Kyle Rayner and Wally West, or the Teen Titans age characters like Supergirl and Jamie Reyes, or both. Kyle is popular, but he'll -always- be second string to Hal (and John Stewart if you count the JLU exposure). I can't comment on Wally because I don't care about the Flash. DC doesn't know what to do with the modern Supergirl. The new Blue Beetle has a cult fanbase, but it's not enough to keep his solo title going. Teen Titans are one of the core DC books, but it still doesn't sell anywhere near the levels of the main Batbooks or GL titles.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    Potential new customers will always out number existing customers, unless you have 50% or more of the population as customers, however only idiots sell to "potential new customers" primarily. It's a losing business model and I don't think I know of any time it has ever succeeded. It's because the return ratio is horrible...

    If I have 100 loyal customers and doing something to scare off 50 of those to potentially get 100 new customers I will have long term made a lose because 50% retention almost never happens in any business. 25% is roughly what most successful MMOs do.

    Further more you are not only losing the 50's money you are simultaneously spending money on some sort of campaign to attract these new customers which equates to more lost capital. On top of that, the customers you do retain from the original 100 are more likely to leave due to the business breaking trust and the retention rate will be less due to the original 100 making it known that the company isn't as trust worthy as once believed and by the simple act of complaining will drive newer people away...

    It is always better to retain the original 100 and work on getting more... your in the same or better position doing this.
    To stick with your numbers.

    As for the money spent on advertising. I think it's safe to say that DC is getting a lot more backing from WB than they were previously. WB are looking to the DC universe for the next Harry Potter franchise.

    The only aspect of the comic book industry that's been growing is digital sales. Monthlies are slowing bleeding off readers (barring the occasional sales stunt like the Future Foundation reboot, but it's still too early to tell how that's going to hold up) and the top selling books used to clear 100,000 copies easy on a regular basis. Now it's sales spike for the highest selling title to sell to 100,000 copies. And while trades do sell, neither Marvel or DC are switching to a trades only format any time soon.

    Is DC down to the hardcore fanbase who'll buy their product no matter what? I certainly hope not. But those 100 customers were 110 last year. And 120 the year before that. And if DC wouldn't be pulling the Flashpoint reboot, according to the trends of sales they'd be down to 90 next year. As of right now, DC is not attracting new customers. For some reason, even the whole "Drawing the Line at $2.99" thing backfired. DC got small spike, but they're right back to where they were, if not worse.

    So yeah, there's risk that DC will lose a chunk of their 100 customers with the reboot. But there's also a chance that even if they lose 50% out of spite for the reboot, they'll gain 55%. And the word of mouth from the new people that -like- the new direction will bring in another 20% and so on.
  19. My biggest complaint about the movies is that Depp seemed to be phoning it in during a few scenes. Sparrow works best playing off of other characters, imho, than he does just rambling next to or prancing around in front of extras.

    I enjoyed McShane and Cruz though. And Rush is always awesome as Barbossa. And as I understand it, an early version of the script actually showed Barbossa losing the Pearl to Blackbeard. I'd watch a movie focusing on that.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by CaptainFoamerang View Post
    It felt like too much of a rehash of the first one, and the love plot between the missionary and the mermaid seemed totally out of place, which becomes evident when you realize just how little interaction there was between Jack and those two characters.
    >.>

    <.<

    I support the missionary's position!
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    A reboot of the universe means all my characters are gone so if it is an actual reboot I am more than likely going to stop reading...as I suspect most people are.

    Apparently the people making this decision are too stupid to realize that their most popular characters will be completely shunted out of existence or rewrote in such a way as to make them not that character....
    Does your crystal ball tell you lottery numbers too?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    and yes the most poplar characters just happen to be the ones i like and the ones that sell the best, Tim Drake, Stephenie Brown, Cassandra Cain, Barbara Gordon as Oracle (i enjoy her as batgirl, but Oracle is much better)...
    I'll give you Tim Drake being popular. But Brown and Cain are stretching it. Oracle, yeah, but how many times has BoP been relaunched now?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    hell i'd even say that most of the young generation of superheroes sell better ... than the older generation
    Not in DC they don't.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    and all of them will be shunted or changed irrevocably... With that being the case many readers will just turn off.
    Again, I'd like to see this crystal ball of yours.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    The reboot will also turn off those who love the older characters because those characters are made more kid friendly which takes them back, rather than forward, over crap that we've already read.
    Hate to break it to you, but I think DC has learned the hard way that potential new readers (the target audience of the post Flashpoint reboot) outnumber their current fanbase they've been catering to for the better part of the last decade (longstanding readers like you and me) by a very wide margin

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    THey're making a huge mistake, one that will cost them.
    Oh they'll get a sales boost from all the new number 1s. The big thing will be to see if they can stick to it (and not panic in a few months and reset everything, again) AND carry the momentum with competent creative teams who won't drive off readers. Like, say, Jeph Loeb and the Ultimate Universe.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samothrake View Post
    ...
    Please correct me if I am wrong in thinking that this is the first glimpse we have for the new universe’s costumes, because if it’s not the following statements will not make much sense.

    Wonder Woman’s costume – what we can see of it – looks very much like the current one, minus the arm straps and jacket, and with a few tweaks here and there. The bottom is hard to tell if it is supposed to be black, or dark navy blue. I am leaning towards black, because her hair has the traditional ‘so black it’s blue’ highlights, but I rather hope that part is a dark blue. I also see elements from the failed television show in there. To me, it looks interesting.
    Looks like a hybrid of the old suit and the new costume. Hopefully she ends up with some variation of red boots to add something to the solid black leggings.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samothrake View Post
    ... Superman’s costume seems to be mostly the classic design. I rather like the high collar, but I’m not sold on the “S” shield design. It also looks like they ditched the “underwear on the outside” part as well. This Superman looks to be in his mid 20s instead of the early-mid 30's we have nowadays.
    Word is there's a mandate that everyone in tights has a collar now. *shrug* (Rumor has is that a few years back one of the newer higher ups at DC also declared that it was time to get rid of the underwear-on-the-outside look. Bruce's costume post return ditched them, and now Clark has finally gotten rid of 'em too.) This outfit looks a lot like an older Elseworlds version of the costume that was supposed to be more Kryptonian influence on the design. Dunno why they had to re-do the S shield. About goddamned time they got rid of the superunderoos too. There's also word that Supes new costume has kneepads of all things.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samothrake View Post
    ... Aquaman has the most recent scale mail top, and looks to be very much the Brightest Day suit, with the high collar of Superman and Green Lantern. Not really that much different.

    Overall, I look forward to DC revealing the updated looks of more of its heroes in next three months. And you know they will. And hopefully, we can have some lively discussion here with those new costumes.
    Eh, I like Aquaman's look in Flashpoint.

    Oh, and Batman's costume has minor tweaks too. as far as I can tell so far, his gloves look to be more armored, and the yellow around the bat on his chest is gone, again.
  22. Ugh. I could have survived without the "fanservice" shots of Hisako.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Father Xmas View Post
    Fan subs of course, Episode 7 aired on the 20th.

    Since they found Frost, they've already talked about the Inner Circle of the Hellfire Club which she was once part of. Once they established that context, no need to include "of the Hellfire Club" part anymore when talking about the Inner Circle.
    They do use the real name? I'm only up to ep 4, and I was just wondering if it was a Bowdlerization of the name Hellfire Club.
  23. Are these official or fansubs? I just find it odd that they say "Shut the **** up" but they also use Inner Circle as the name for the Hellfire Club.
  24. Y'know why you were all able to go about your business, right?