Wintry

That's provided you know what folder though. What I explained is how to find that out if you don't.

Funny thing is, one thing that's always escaped me is I can't for the life of me see why this whole process needs to be so obscure. You would think that the guys over at Teamspeak made it a bit more transparent themselves, but on top of making the plugin system needlessly complicated they don't even give a brief explanation of how to best go about installing one anywhere that I know of.
I might actually have to do an installer for this by the looks of it...

Anyway... if the provided method doesn't work (for whatever reason) here's how to fix it:
The ZIP file needs to be extracted into the plugins folder.

Method using registry
Either one of the two following two registry keys' default values will contain a path.

• HKCU\Software\TeamSpeak 3 Client
• HKLM\Software\TeamSpeak 3 Client

That path will also end in "\TeamSpeak 3 Client".
Append "\plugins" to it and that's your plugins folder.

Method NOT using registry
If you don't know how to or don't want to poke around in the registry just search your PC for the file "clientquery_plugin.dll".
This DLL belongs to a plugin which is installed with the TS3 client by default. The folder it's in is your plugins folder.

Well, my point was more that you can't really measure it and thus I think most people who go for the more coolness option would feel inclined to do even if the difference was much bigger.
You can't really weigh it against "a few percent".
I reckon the difference margin you tolerate when going for coolness is more likely to be quite large and it wouldn't be until the point of saying "Geez, this power A may look good but it's just absolutely, totally, utterly useless in comparison to power B!" that you'd decide otherwise.

Perhaps the cooler looking one is also only a few % cooler looking... or wait... how do you intend to measure this?

How do you make a decision based on an equation with something absolute on one side and something relative on the other?

Haha, I was thinking the same thing.

I'll set this up later today. Though it'll be subject to change in the future, because a more sophisticated system for managing on-demand event channels is already in the pipeline.

Does this work for the 64-bit version?
http://www.heroicvoices.eu/download/...0.1.0.1x64.zip

I've been thinking that, but whenever I asked myself what sort of channels people could find useful to have my inspirationless mind kept failing me.
Open to any suggestions, just shout.

Also, I'm not around all the time myself, so it could very well be that certain groups of people use this at times neither me nor any other admins are around in which case if it may be necessary to have more admins at some point - especially as usage increases.
Currently there are 3 admins for this server, myself included, and they're all europeans.

So... what's in the works?

Better?

Probably, but - considering a few factors - I sort of changed the plan a little moments before posting this while already typing the post and didn't think of that consequence I guess.
I'm not gonna bother requesting a move or anything for now though since chances are I may expand this towards a few US servers too in the foreseeable future.

I just need to sort a few things first serverside mostly - all in due time.

Aah, that one.
Yes, it could help with that... if it works...

I never recommend it 'cause most all overlays will usually only work for half the people and after having developed such a thing myself about a year ago I found out exactly why too.

It's worth a try if you'd like to have it yourself, but it'll just be a matter of testing it for everyone who finds it worth that. For some it will work, for some it won't.
It depends on a combination of factors like GFX drivers, hardware acceleration, the way the overlay was written, OS, D3D version, etc, etc... so there's really no telling.

An alt he kept offline before specifically for this purpose.

And me...
I suppose it doesn't really count since I took my last toon out somewhere down the line, so strictly speaking I'm not a current member anymore, but I do still play.

Kendai, man... take a cold shower or something and wake up.
I'm not sure if this is a ridicule you just genuinely believe in yourself or pure neglect, but your vision is far and I mean far off from realism.

You hide behind some generic rules to try and make yourself look like a good guy, but the matter at hand is much more basic: operating a channel of such proportions on your own is never a good idea.

"But I never said I'll permanently remain the only op."
"There will be other ops again in the near future."

Newsflash: too late!
Why? Because in any case you're already past the worst part of this all.

If a number of ops operate a channel and you, being one, don't like how it's going then you discuss it with the others. Even if it's some of those people themselves whose behavior you question, then you discuss it, you work it out and you find a way to solve it as a team. That is the whole point of having multiple ops.

You demoted and kicked people without warning, no matter what you plan on doing in the future that's abuse of the rights you were entrusted by everyone else and an act of personal disrespect towards those particular people to boot. You can say all you want about how you want the channel to be used and how that differs - if at all - from how it was before and throw in "strictly speaking" type of stuff in your sentences as much as you want, but you don't seem to understand even half of what you've done on a social interaction level.

Furthermore nearly every time I've ever seen an op get silenced by another op if you looked at the context it was in good fun, often in a joke context and it was always received that way by both parties - bar the very occasional serious silence where one had to remind the other of the rules as well. But they would always be unsilenced, meaning there would be multiple people with their own perspectives to judge everyone else in the channel again. That was always maintained and that is exactly the first and foremost reason there were multiple ops to begin with. Because that way whenever someone else would play the borders of rules we all tried to maintain ops could always take care of it in a non-biased manner. A dictatorship on the other hand isn't gonna do anyone any good, no matter what twisted justifications you can come up with.

And lastly I'd advise you to just read this over once more and think about it for a while because if there's any chance you understood a word of what I just typed on the first read I probably wouldn't have had to type it in the first place.
You need to come to your senses, or in fact any senses.

Rofl, priceless. Couldn't have phrased it any better.