This one speaks for itself.


Aleusha

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nalrok_AthZim View Post
I remember a forum poster saying they'd collected a list of every typo they could find and the document was pretty sizeable. These are just six examples, and there are hundreds (maybe a thousand or so) more. You can call it hilarious all you want, but the fact remains that this game really does need someone to proofread it. Did you look at the errors in SSA7? Did you?



Mind explaining how that got through? That is unacceptable. What's more unacceptable is that typos can be reported in Beta and ignored for several issues.
That example is, yes. The example from the OP is a very easy mistake both to make and miss in QA.

And yeah you kinda need to chill a bit. Yes, some of the text errors in this game are pretty sad, but they're really not game-breaking in the slightest.


"You don't lose levels. You don't have equipment to wear out, repair, or lose, or that anyone can steal from you. About the only thing lighter than debt they could do is have an NPC walk by, point and laugh before you can go to the hospital or base." -Memphis_Bill
We will honor the past, and fight to the last, it will be a good way to die...

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nalrok_AthZim View Post


In the past, I've been shot down by Zwillinger for speaking out against the fact that there is absolutely no evidence of proofreading done in this game. Granted I was very harsh, but come on. This level of lack of polish is unacceptable, especially for someone like myself who spent years working Quality Control for Google Maps.
Actually, I believe that is the little-used archaic formal way of saying "and why, exactly, I'ma-be using MY army to fight Longbow?"


Alternatively, perhaps the game believes this is how you sarcastically reply to people commenting on your eloquence as judged by brainwashed people.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironblade View Post
No, no, no.
These typos are nothing less than A SLAP IN THE FACE!
Drink.


 

Posted

1. Many of the typos I've reported have been fixed. This is most likely to happen in early Beta when the content-writer is revising text based on feedback. However, once the 'story' is fixed, I've noticed typos are a lot less likely to get fixed because now it's QA error-correction department's responsibility, and they have a lot more important stuff on their plate. So, if you want the grammar and spelling to be correct, do your grammar-naziing in early Beta.

2. Yes, egregious errors inexplicably stick around a long time.

3. INSERT BIO HERE: That's my fault. The last few SSA#1 arcs had a handful of closed Beta testers to specifically check for grammar problems. I (and, obviously, several others) didn't even think of checking bios of NPCs. And so, now, the SSA#2 arcs don't even have closed Beta any more. It's open to everyone to grammar-check. And so, if mistakes get through, it's *your* fault.

4. In the past two Issues, there have been *a lot* less *spelling* errors. It seems obvious to me that they are finally putting their text through a spelling checker program... finally! However, as we all know, spelling checkers aren't as good at finding grammatical mistakes or correctly spelled wrong words (as in defuse <> diffuse).

5. Quite frankly, errors like the one in the OP get past me quite readily. I'm more likely to see misspelled words or notice inconsistencies in the story content than a verbal mash-up.


Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides