Whats more surviable. dp/em, dp/fm or ta/dp


Amy_Amp

 

Posted

Only considering the tricks they can bring from there primaries and secondaries, which would you find more survivable?

Seems they are all about the same damage potential.


 

Posted

Easily ta/dp. The blaster combos will bring fun new ways to deal damage in their secondaries, and a bit of mitigation, but the defender will excel in debuffs and control type powers in his primary. The damage will be down a good bit, but I am sure it would be more survivable by a notable amount.


Words to the wise aren't necessary- it's the stupid ones that need them.

"You're right...I forgot...being constantly at or the near the damage cap is a big turn off. Definitely not worth it."
- Vitality

 

Posted

The first two because DP/TA will make you want to suicide due to the redraw.


 

Posted

You have some great character names therer Tex. My inner punster approves


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison
See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrainRobber View Post
Only considering the tricks they can bring from there primaries and secondaries, which would you find more survivable?

Seems they are all about the same damage potential.
The blaster will do more damage. The defender will be more survivable in the context that they have debuffs. If I want a survivable DP character, I go Traps over TA.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oedipus_Tex View Post
The first two because DP/TA will make you want to suicide due to the redraw.

ThatÂ’s exactly what i was thinking. WHY DO I ALWAYA AGREE WITH YOU!?!?!?!?!? >.<


Plus, imho TA doesn't really add that much survivability to the user. I love the set, but something like dark/ traps/ etc etc would add much more noticeable survivability.


"I have ridden the mighty moon worm!"
-Al Gore
Fiery Aura is only good for farming, I'm cereal

@Caucasiafro