Ladder Stuff - Stalker Restrictions Revisited


Borderline Boss

 

Posted

wait wait wait... playing a stalker with forts and mm's up your *** is easier than playing a psi/em? seriously, dex?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
Lets do a mock line up here with what you suggested.
Team A: 2 emps 6 stalkers
Team B: 2 emps 4 Forts 2 stalkers (since nothing else can kill with just 2)
Match becomes a 4v4 2 emps 2 stalkers vs 2 emps 2 stalkers granted your forts will do a little damage to the other stalkers and those other stalkers will get some out of hide sharks off. Sounds like alot of fun to me. So much skill being showcased. If you wanna argue this maybe try to get the ladder be 4v4s

yeah, that match would never happen like that.
the fact that you'd counter with Team B just points to how knowledge in countering has gone down the drain.


 

Posted

Guarantee the Psy em will die more then a stalker no matter what. So yes. Not to mention the blaster has to actually do an attack chain not just SHRAK RUN OMG GTFO SHRAK IS OFF.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by iLostCountBarrier View Post
yeah, that match would never happen like that.
the fact that you'd counter with Team B just points to how knowledge in countering has gone down the drain.
Just using your suggestion.... Forts aint what they use to be barrier...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
Guarantee the Psy em will die more then a stalker no matter what. So yes. Not to mention the blaster has to actually do an attack chain not just SHRAK RUN OMG GTFO SHRAK IS OFF.

oh yeah, hitting three buttons in quick succession after hitting tab 3 times over is a lot harder than evading mm pets, webs and dominate being constantly thrown at you in order to land an AS (sharks are good, but seriously AS is what gets you a kill, but nevertheless, let's pretend it's just about 300 point sharks out hide). totally.

seriously dex?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
Just using your suggestion.... Forts aint what they use to be barrier...
my four fort mention was a reference to i12 vill-side matches, when you'd have teams running 4 forts, and a stalker and the stalker would still get AS's off. and we're talking far better people on the forts than the ones that are currently playing.


 

Posted

oh and did i mention, everyone had capped psi resists back then? yeah.. ok... forts did damage. right.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by iLostCountBarrier View Post
oh yeah, hitting three buttons in quick succession after hitting tab 3 times over is a lot harder than evading mm pets, webs and dominate being constantly thrown at you in order to land an AS (sharks are good, but seriously AS is what gets you a kill, but nevertheless, let's pretend it's just about 300 point sharks out hide). totally.

seriously dex?
Your whole argument seems to be leading to one thing and one thing only... A villain ladder, Please feel free to go make one.

And a blaster that gets only 3 attacks off is a bad blaster, Im starting to see why some jump teams didnt seem as strong as some others.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
Your whole argument seems to be leading to one thing and one thing only... A villain ladder, Please feel free to go make one.

And a blaster that gets only 3 attacks off is a bad blaster, Im starting to see why some jump teams didnt seem as strong as some others.
procs.
but ok. whatever. separate topic.




well, barring more than 2 instances of the main damage AT villainside resulted in what essentially was a hero league + brutes. at least when people weren't RPing CIGAL style and running doms just because playing a blaster is this game's equivalent of the konami code (not f hard).


 

Posted

I think we can all agree that you are fighting a losing battle barrier. It looks like the captains want a stalker restriction as well as double blind line ups.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
I think we can all agree that you are fighting a losing battle barrier. It looks like the captains want a stalker restriction as well as double blind line ups.
great line of reasoning dex.
mf brilliant.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by iLostCountBarrier View Post
great line of reasoning dex.
mf brilliant.
Just stating the obvious, dont blame me Im not a captain.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
Just stating the obvious, dont blame me Im not a captain.
stupid ideas are still stupid even if everyone believes them otherwise.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by iLostCountBarrier View Post
stupid ideas are still stupid even if everyone believes them otherwise.
Just because you believe one idea is stupid and another isn't does not make it so. Opinions are opinions.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
Just because you believe one idea is stupid and another isn't does not make it so. Opinions are opinions.
you're the one that deviated from a discussion based on facts and reasoning...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by iLostCountBarrier View Post
you're the one that deviated from a discussion based on facts and reasoning...
Lol you were not using facts nor reasoning.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
Lol you were not using facts nor reasoning.
point to a concrete example, cutie.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by iLostCountBarrier View Post
An argument for that could be made.

But if the last league didn't prove to you how the blind-line-up submission completely wrecked the roles of even more ATs when it came to high-end pvp matches, then there's no way you're gonna see things from my point of view.

i'm PERSONALLY ok with no ts no hd because I (MEMEMEMEME) believe they up the skill-ante, the game stops being a JUST damage spam. so yes, it's fiteclub. it's huge fiteclub.


if you can make an argument that states that playing a psy/em in a league match took more skill than playing a stalker with 4 forts up your *** much like in i12, then i might see things your way. i'd rather be challenged by countering teams than keep playing mf dice with line-ups.
sections 2 and 4 of the penial


 

Posted

#2: i'll break it down for you since it seems like it needs to be done: we saw so many mm's outside of the lab map. we saw a million forts. we saw so so many thermals. and oh god, yes, i throughly enjoyed all the cold corrs that were part of winning matches. add to that all the non-ta non-emp trollers. those were everywhere. oh wait. they weren't. oh and the non-psi/em blasters, those were great.

#4: already broke it down for you before. fort chasing you + mm pets permantently locked on you = harder than tab tab click x 3-4.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by iLostCountBarrier View Post
#2: i'll break it down for you since it seems like it needs to be done: we saw so many mm's outside of the lab map. we saw a million forts. we saw so so many thermals. and oh god, yes, i throughly enjoyed all the cold corrs that were part of winning matches. add to that all the non-ta non-emp trollers. those were everywhere. oh wait. they weren't. oh and the non-psi/em blasters, those were great.

#4: already broke it down for you before. fort chasing you + mm pets permantently locked on you = harder than tab tab click x 3-4.
All your problems seem centered more around the way i13 works than the rules


http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/6685529/3-hot-and-vex-3

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daknah View Post
sections 2 and 4 of the penial
Dex you really have to stop arguing against stalkers with shrak attack as the only argument, yes plenty of stupid stalkers run around with only shark but theres plenty who know how to use their stalkers and quite a few that are shrakless in there builds - pretty sure con and mac have sharkless stalkers they are both in the same team as barrier, those who will play in the ladder trowing sharks probably don't know how to play their stalkers anyway so wont be much of a threat.

Stalkers can be countered against like I said to you earlier in AC there really is no reason for there to be a stalker cap - one as low as 2 anyway.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borderline Boss View Post
Soul touch is on barriers side, case closed the opposing side has won.
Borderline terrible please stay quiet when did you start using the forums