Going Rogue and Levelpacts

Wow, wish I wasn't distracted, and I could have told you as well. Currently, no, no cross faction pacts. If it WAS then I wouldn't have the question, since I would assume, since you can have a hero-villain pact, it wouldn't break.

So, yes. There is NO Hero-Villain pacting, why I was wondering. I have some characters me and a friend pacted on, and some may switch sides. If, however, pacts will have a chance of being broken, I guess we'll have to hit 50, pacted, before even worrying about switching sides when it happens...

With Love,
Me! <3

---

My Characters
Story Arcs Looking for Feedback:
Serving Vengeance:#419748 (For Villains/Vigilantes) (Drama/Mystery) (Viable Within Canon)
Dark Moon Rising: #13170 (For Heroes/Vigilantes) (Horror/Mystery) (Non-Canon)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly? I'm hoping Going Rogue breaks the 'no teaming, no friending, no trading' ban between sides. I'd love to have a Supergroup base that members on both sides of the pond can enter. Just make it so only Neutrals and Heroes can use Hero Teleporter locations and only neutrals and villains can use Villain zone teleporters.

-Rachel-

[/ QUOTE ]

FWIW, I do believe Posi mentioned merging the markets - so removing the other barriers, well...

And I wish I'd seen the rest of this earlier, I'd have saved you a run to the D. Tested that *long* ago - no cross-faction level pants. Er, pacts.

[/ QUOTE ]

...I am curious as to why you left that typo in. Amused, but curious!

Still, it was a good excuse to get rollin' today.

[/ QUOTE ]

It was, of course, intentional.

---

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly? I'm hoping Going Rogue breaks the 'no teaming, no friending, no trading' ban between sides. I'd love to have a Supergroup base that members on both sides of the pond can enter. Just make it so only Neutrals and Heroes can use Hero Teleporter locations and only neutrals and villains can use Villain zone teleporters.

-Rachel-

[/ QUOTE ]

FWIW, I do believe Posi mentioned merging the markets - so removing the other barriers, well...

And I wish I'd seen the rest of this earlier, I'd have saved you a run to the D. Tested that *long* ago - no cross-faction level pants. Er, pacts.

[/ QUOTE ]

...I am curious as to why you left that typo in. Amused, but curious!

Still, it was a good excuse to get rollin' today.

[/ QUOTE ]

It was, of course, intentional.

[/ QUOTE ]

All typos by obviously literate writers should be considered intentional unless they are not humorous.

It will be interesting to see what the answer to this is, but i suspect it will be the less interesting option of "level pacts are severed for the one who changes alignment." Actually, i'd prefer affiliation in place of alignment, particularly since we'll be able to stay in the grey area rather than going completely to one side or the other.

---

Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...