Turgenev

I stow 'em in my Awesome Button(tm).

zomg, someone set the Rapture flag to ENABLED.

(And yeah, MB pointed that out a few minutes ago, I hadn't noticed 'til now. Creepy.)

Yarrr, me am Bizarro Pirate Turg for "Talk Like Pirate" Day. MB not wrong, me am 965, more than stupid Superman!. Yarrr, Bizarro Pirate Turg SMASH!

Not really. It's only been this consistently bad on Freedom since 1.) GR went live, so that's new code and a lot more players; and 2.) since the server relocation from VA to TX in July, where we began to notice some niggling issues.

Before July, we'd cruise at yellow, very occasionally dip into the red, and be slicker than snot than other servers like Virtue and Guardian, whose problems have been far worse than here.

So, yeah, we got issues right now for instability. I don't think it's load related (because I've played her at full-on red, queues engaged, and have been pretty smooth), but rather corky code that got thru their QA team.

I'm behind you that I want the instability fixed. But I'm against you when you think it can just be fixed with MOAR CPU.

Cheers. Welcome to Freedom.

-T.

Awesome. Thanks for opening this up, guys. I heard about your nine minute run. I'm mildly dazzled by how awful the redside runs tend to be in comparison. o.O

I'll send a shout today. Cheers.

Minimum to join is 45 on this, MJ. If you can level up before 1030 eastern, you'll be in good position.

Cuz that's how I roll.

>.>

(Fixed, thanks. I'd combined Soviet and Legbah's two secondaries cuz those're the two I was considering for the run...)

This is occurring across multiple servers (Freedom, Virtue and Triumph are affected so far). I have a thread in the Tech Issues forum where people are glomming common info.

Okay, that's all kindsa brilliant. Nice one, Kheldarn.

Now, back to the issue... DEVS, FIX DIS!

In my defense, Reichsman obviously thought _I_ was the biggest danger on the field, because after he stepped out of his machine after the third time, he passed the brute, two scrappers, and the rest of the team to gun for ME, standing in the back of the group.

SO glad I bought tier 3 health/def insps... >.>

But yeah, a LONG run, but a successful one! Kudos to everyone (even Tux, whom I managed to out-aggro) for a heck of a team, and grats to Max/MP's team later that night for also getting a successful Master run!

Is this the condition where a vigilante on a SF can use Ouroboros to go to the hero side, and when they head back pets will attack them at random?

Honestly, I agree: I treat the Vet system as "working as designed" and don't see a fault with its implementation. Certain items are rewarded after X months of subscription - that's fairly cut and dry to me.

The other side of the argument views the rewards as restrictions and wants the restrictions done away with wholesale. My "compromise" suggestion was meant to address their wanting choice in the matter while not breaking the veteran reward system entirely. However, if you ask what my first choice is, it'd be "status quo". Why? Because of exactly what you describe: The perceived "best rewards" would be picked first, and the complaints would continue about not having the ones they want later on. All that work would be for show, ultimately, and wouldn't have a real return on keeping subscribers (if they were only staying/quitting because vet rewards... I mean come on).