The_Foo

[ QUOTE ]
Now go draw BSG pics and post!

[/ QUOTE ]
Yessir. I already will be. Nudes, remember?

My awesome is fueled by hatred.

It's a unique animosynthesis process used by only myself and villain wrestlers.

*edited because "animosynthesis is funnier and more accurate than "animosis"

You can likely contact them via DC, since they're currently working on the Wonder Woman book there.

[ QUOTE ]
And Foo, you are one funny dude.

[/ QUOTE ]
Why do people keep saying that?

Thanks, pop!

[ QUOTE ]
Hey Mardun, the "ignore" list is pretty easy to use. OR, you can tell him to go FRAK off. Your call. I got your back.

[/ QUOTE ]
Don't be jealous. I will consume your vitals as well, if you wish.

[ QUOTE ]
Wait Foo, when do you draw in the Nude? Don't you get cold?

[/ QUOTE ]
No, no. You see, you've made a mistake in interpretation here. I was referring to nude portraits of our beloved crew, not myself being nude!
HA!

Hahaha!

How delightfully amusing, don't you think?

No, I don't get cold drawing nudes while I'm nude.

Damn it! Who called off the fracas?

Fine. I'll just have to go home and draw pictures of BSGers.


...Nude.


...I'm starting with Admiral Adama.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because we have forums that are devided up for the ease of us of everyone who posts. This thread should be in the Comic Culture section...where there are actually several BSG threads. Now, I don't really care that much, but it does make for a more cluttered forum. When I want to read about something like this I look in another section. When I want to read about art I look in this section. That having been said, I am just suprised that it hasn't been moderated as they usually delete posts like this. That's all I am saying.

*shrug*

[/ QUOTE ]

I understand what you are saying. I posted here because I find the people that regularily visit this section are among the best and nicest on the boards. I usually get abused like a noob on World of Warcraft on everyother forum over the smallest thing.

[/ QUOTE ]
It's because you're an idiot, asspants. Way to ruin the world by posting something offtopic!

I look forward to consuming your vital organs in the coming fracas!

EN GARDE!

[ QUOTE ]
I can only ansi genitals ;_;

[/ QUOTE ]Whose genitals is that?

Aha! Lots better!

Which "piece" is that?

OK, I did some editing, due to my nit-pickiness and some off-hand comments on the DA board!


Rowr and Valkarye in "Midnight Snack"!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now, I've never seen GB's butt, but I'm gonna assume it's not angular, or those quarters wouldn't bounce off properly.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cheeky git (pun intended )

[/ QUOTE ]
...I note you didn't deny it.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"...Also, I think the fact that the shot is pretty much perpendicular to GB makes it lack the usual depth your pieces have. Perhaps if he were tilted 10-20 degrees towards the viewer, there'd be more dynamism. ..."

[/ QUOTE ]

OOOooohh.. I see. You mean if the cityscape were tilted a little bit, it would have a more dynamic look. That's a good idea and I might mess with it some (with Great Briton's approval, of course).

[/ QUOTE ]
I actually meant him, relative to the camera, so it'd be more like he's flying up/right and towards the camera. That way he's "moving" three-dimensionally, rather than simply 2D (i.e., diagonally up and right).

Tilting the city may work as well. I'm not really sure how you've got things set up over there.

*edit* Actually, checking it out again, you're right. Tilting the city could help, too.

I like it, though I can see some of what people are saying.

For one, his right buttock is oddly square. Now, I've never seen GB's butt, but I'm gonna assume it's not angular, or those quarters wouldn't bounce off properly.

Also, I think the fact that the shot is pretty much perpendicular to GB makes it lack the usual depth your pieces have. Perhaps if he were tilted 10-20 degrees towards the viewer, there'd be more dynamism.

I love the outfit and model, though. They helmet is very Gort.

[ QUOTE ]
Said it before, The drawing is beautiful Foo.

And how comes everyone comments only on the cat-girl, when I do get mention I am called a drow.....enough to give a girl a complex

A good warrior always keep her weapons close. Now excuse me, I have some ice-cream to eat

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm glad you two like it! It was fun and challenging to do!

[ QUOTE ]
Nicely done and all, but

1) why is the "Drow" lady bringing her bow and arrows to bed?

2) why do I get the feeling you have an uncensored version?

[/ QUOTE ]
1) A good hero is always prepared!
2) You want something naughtier than this?

So after a massive hiatus, a business trip, and some other various non-art annoytia, I have finally made art!

Rowr and Valkarye in "Midnight Snack"!

Remember, folks, keep your windows and doors locked at nights!

Rowr already commissioned me to draw that.

She doesn't know it yet, but she did.

I didn't notice because Tanks are dead to me.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

We're backing to fighting AVs circa-I2, except we've got hatcheted defenses, and the AVs have boosted HP.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget, we had single target taunts in our attacks too, back then. You could tank an AV without the Taunt power at release. Gauntlet was added for dealing with groups.

[/ QUOTE ]
O YA. We're WORSE off!

That would be retarded. Taunt is already a hammy way of getting Tanks to take more aggro than they're "worth". A scaling version would just be ridiculous.

Why would they get more aggro? Are they more angry and using worse insults? Are they putting their brain to the test and discovering psychic abilities heretofore unknown?

Dynamite. The solution is dynamite.

[ QUOTE ]
Sigh...so controllers become 2nd rate defenders and get to be controlelrs for 1/3 of an AV fight.

Tanks simply need to use taunt/provoke - moves that are EASILY accesible to them - for them to do their job. Maybe because I'm an old schoo ltankl thats accustom to provoke > taunt, and eventually vice versa - to me having punchvoke was a + allowing me to do my job easier, but its not an end all to being a tank. Like I said if you want to take the aggro of an AV use taunt, you don't have to slot it, and if you doslot it you get even MORE time to attack still. Tanks are still herding huge amounts of minions and lts like nothing - so whats the problem? Its merely a balance thing, its become enritely TOO easy to beat Avs with a tank on the team who doens't even have taunt. Thin kof it in the classic comic book terms - Fantastic four - fighting a bunch of doom's henchmen - Thing will aggro them all and they will attack him - even though Johny Storm is doing the real dmg with his fireblast. They get to Dr. Doom - the 'AV' is he really going to focus on thing simply because thing hits him a couple times? Hardly - he 'knows' better.
- :blue:

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, Doom's so smart he'll ignore putting huge, stone fists into his armour, but if Ben starts talking about his momma, he's gonna focus, damn it!

You can dress this up any way you want to, but it's horseshit. Gauntlet is supposed to be a tool for retaining aggro in conjunction with Taunt and Auras. This change effectively takes it AND AURAS out of the equation.

We're backing to fighting AVs circa-I2, except we've got hatcheted defenses, and the AVs have boosted HP.

I hate you. Because you're beautiful.