Stray Kitten

Super-Powered
  • Posts

    591
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ecnat View Post
    You can find to-hit debuffs on any Dark Blast or Dark Melee character. It's also one of the most overlooked debuffs out there. How many times do you hear someone say "oh I think we might need more to-hit debuffs"?

    You can also find Resistance debuffs on Pain Domination, Thermal, Sonic Blast, and Sonic Resonance which in my opinion are more suitable to every day situations. Or you know, I do believe you can proc out most defense debuff powers with an Achilles Heel -Resistance proc if you have the resources.
    To hit and resist were the ones off the top of my head that they had in common.

    Dark Miasma brings to the table:
    -tohit, -damage, -resist, -regen, -speed, -fly, -recharge, +def, +res, and a pet that stacks a lot of these effects

    Storm:
    -tohit, -defense, -resist, -recharge, -fly, -speed, -range, -end, +def, and +res

    Now, I'm going to stop before we derail Silas' guide any further than it already has been, but keep in mind that I never said Pain Dom was a bad set necessarily, just one that I couldn't get behind.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Alpha_Zulu View Post
    Don't laugh. Someone bought one for 1.6 billion.
    One sold blueside for 2 billion. Srsly.
  3. Um, shot in the dark here, but try looking at the online stores for US retailers?
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ecnat View Post
    Funny how you say earlier in the thread you say about Pain Dom bringing nothing to the table that makes you want one on your team but then you list Storm Summoning and Dark Miasma in the list as better. What do Storm and Dark bring that makes you say "ZOMG!!1! WE NEED A STORM/DARK!!1!"? Quite honestly the only thing I hear people cry for are Kinetics.
    Really? You don't want resistance/tohit debuffs?
    Quote:
    I think the problem with all of the close-minded people here are that the devs lead them along about what Pain Domination was when Positron first released info on it and now they feel jipped. While that is the case, attacking a thread where someone tries to help others with open minds or no expectations understand Pain Domination and how to play it is uncalled for.

    The guide itself is well written although lacking a lot of the sarcastic humor from the Kinetics and Cold Domination guides. It's helpful and I approve of it as someone who plays a Pain Dom Corruptor and has fun with it.
    I don't think anyone ever said that it was a bad guide, actually I know that Silas is a good player and from his other guides I can pretty well say that this was a good guide before I opened it.

    For the record, most of the people posting here saying they don't like pain dom aren't being closed minded, just stating an opinion. I personally can't get behind it even after helping test it in i13 closed beta. This is a personal opinion and nothing more. I have never stopped someone from bringing a pain dom corr/MM to a team (actually, most teams I build, I just let people bring whatever unless they ask me to pick between x or y).
  5. As far as my participation in the next team is concerned, unfortunately my class schedule will be interfering until the end of the current semester so I won't be signing up. However, should there be any free spots come December, I will roll something and get it to whatever level you all are at at the time in order to join up then.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Alpha_Zulu View Post
    Once I saw that this was a pain dom guide I skipped all of it.


    Pain dom blows, make a thermal. Don't EVER make a pain dom. It blows.

    A lot.
    Pretty much. Pain dom is a set I just can not get behind.
  7. I would like to request a private message containing the contents of this now gone thread as well. >.>
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BlackAmaranth View Post
    O.O
    DON'T TOUCH ME! YOUR INFECTED!
    ZOMBIE VIRUS! ZOMBIE VIRUS!!!!!
    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    Psst...
    All kidding aside,
    http://free.avg.com/
    It's not great, but it's better than nothing at all.
    I know, its intentional. I still have a scanner I run over files and such, I just don't run a resident scanner for the time being.

    I prefer Avast! btw
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CriticalKat View Post
    I have used Mcafee's for years with absolutely no problems. I have it on all 4 of my pc's. I don't feel strongly one way or another about it, I use it because its familiar and simple.

    I have heard many people say it sucks or say its basically a virus. I think its all about what you do as an individual online. I am not a big web surfer, I have a few trusted sites such as my bank, companies I pay bills with, amazon.com etc that I use. I send/receive a lot of emails, and use messenger alot for work stuff. My work sites which are of course secure sites. So for someone like me who isn't out discovering each and every dark and scary crack and crevice of the internet daily...it works. People that are more aggressive on the internet, might need something else.

    While I have never had a bad experience with Mcafees , I did have a horrible experience with Norton's. It seemingly threads itself through your entire system and was taking my computer hostage. Some people might like it, though. Personally I found it to be restrictive and too "secure", even when toning down the settings.
    I've actually had those problems with both Norton and McAfee personally, but I really don't feel strongly about either one to be honest. I just find that when I'm helping people troubleshoot things and they have McAfee (or Norton) installed its the culprit a solid majority of the time in cases like this.

    Fwiw, I don't even run an anti-virus, but that's not something I would recommend.
  10. It went well, felt a bit odd without a lot of the regulars there, but nonetheless a fairly clean raid.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by White Hot Flash View Post
    I think if the person who is giving bad rep to you has way less rep than you do, it comes out as a grey dot. Likewise, if someone with 10 green dots gives a person with one green dot good rep, it counts for more than if someone with one or two greens gave good rep to the same person.
    Reputation may be positive , negative or neutral . Negative reputation may only be given if the administrator has enabled this. Neutral reputation is only given when the person giving reputation does not meet the criteria set by the administrator to affect someone else's reputation.

    (Source)

    On a funny side note, this post:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Stray Kitten View Post
    At a guess, McAfee, seriously. The thing acts more like a virus than a lot of the things its supposed to protect you from. At least you got it fixed though.
    has garnered quite a bit of both positive and negative rep for some reason.

    I never realized people felt that strongly about McAfee one way or the other.
  12. Wasn't there a whole group of people who tried to do this a long time ago to drive prices down and it actually ended up spiking the prices for a few weeks?
  13. If everyone knew this stuff, then we wouldn't have all the marketearing threads every few days.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Blpup View Post
    what if no one wins and you just happen to keep all the money to yourself
    While it doesn't make me question anyone's integrity, this statement brings up a decent point. Is there a contingency plan in place should any of the winners not collect within a reasonable amount of time?
  15. This thread is really still going?
  16. Yeah, after looking over the OP a little closer, I noticed how much of a noob I must've sounded like >.<

    I'll throw in for 100M
  17. So, to make sure I have this straight, the money pool comes from the ticket cost in this?

    Also, does it matter if we want to pay in influence or infamy?

    EDIT: Nevermind that last question, I was skimming the OP while cooking and missed "/side" in the first note some how.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dollymistress View Post
    Tee hee. Analogies are not comparisons...
    ... actually

    Analogy
    1. a similarity between like features of two things, on which a comparison may be based: the analogy between the heart and a pump.
    2. similarity or comparability: I see no analogy between your problem and mine.
    3. Biology. an analogous relationship.
    4. Linguistics. a. the process by which words or phrases are created or re-formed according to existing patterns in the language, as when shoon was re-formed as shoes, when -ize is added to nouns like winter to form verbs, or when a child says foots for feet. b. a form resulting from such a process.
    5. Logic. a form of reasoning in which one thing is inferred to be similar to another thing in a certain respect, on the basis of the known similarity between the things in other respects.
    Not worth arguing IMO, but if you want to debate something you have to at least define your terms before you use them
  19. I don't know if that's worse than the actual conversation or not.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CriticalKat View Post
    Yes I am logged in, lol. I post entirely too much to miss that key ingredient.

    I am not sure what fixed the problem exactly but its fixed. I played with my Mcafee settings, upgraded to the newest Firefox and tiddled around a bit in control panel and came back and now I can see it. So ty for all that helped.

    *btw I am hurt that I only have 1 green dot, apparently I am not a koolkid :-(
    At a guess, McAfee, seriously. The thing acts more like a virus than a lot of the things its supposed to protect you from. At least you got it fixed though.
  21. The sad part, this probably tells us about where ST:O is headed.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by The_Bronx View Post
    Stray, would it be wrong to neg Kat? It isn't like she can see it or return the favor ..
    Well, she might be able to see it on her user panel

    Either way you're asking the wrong person unless you want a philosophical definition.*

    *Do it while no one's looking
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ChillieBlitz View Post
    Except those who did not try the beta.
    Well, since they never previewed it before they bought it, then they really aren't logically target for a bait-and-switch since there would be no way to bait someone who bought a product without "seeing" it first. >.>
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Acemace View Post
    ...Some have referred to it as a bait and switch...
    Whether or not I'm in agreement with the changes I can't say (I quit playing it after about 1 week in the beta) but that is pretty much a textbook bait-and-switch tactic from what I can see.

    1) Have game a certain way all through beta, particularly open beta.

    2) Make a change to the game after open beta has ended, but before the official launch

    3) People buy one thing, expecting another. Still the same "product" but different from what they were shown just a few days before.