KamenRiderV3

[ QUOTE ]
Vald's Impalers, Plagatus, 50 AR/Dev/Mun.

http://sdmb.culex.us/pics/albums/userpics/0valdeden.jpg -- Vald v. Cuppa, the Valds zoning in in a pretty spiral.

http://sdmb.culex.us/pics/albums/use...0valdnolad.jpg -- Vald v. Cuppa, some folk got stuck underground, battles approximately this large were going on all over the map.


[/ QUOTE ]

YAY! I'm Diamond Goddess! I'm in one pic and the other you see my dialogue of being stuck underground! Whee!

So who do I complain to about not having recieved the comic in months?

I have a lvl 30 Grav/Storm controller. I always knew about Dimensional Shift and never took it the power just seems pointless. And it angers most teams, Tanekrs can't taunt them, Blasters can't blast them, and no one knows when they'll phase back, most cases I've seen, DS = dead squishes. Because a lot of times the mob will chase the blaster and follow him until he rephases, then boom. I think turning DS into old Wormhole fits the set. Look how our powers are set up. We get a single target control power, then the AoE version a few levels later. It seems to fit. Maybe they should add Dimensional Shift to one of the Auxillary Power Pools or something instead of throwing it away.

I remember back in beta, exploting Super Speed's crazy DEF buff and herding purples as a lvl 14 Stone/Stone Tanker with a team that took forever killing them. Using the old Provoke that is like right now's tanker taunt with a quicker recharge.

Is this Free-for-all mode support to be against people of same archtypes or different ones?

You know you shouldn't look at this like a negative. Because the previous "nerfs" was changes they felt needed to be made without OUR suggestion. In this situation, the devs opened up their ears how the AT should be improved instead of them thinking of ideas which would make us [censored] and moan and cause them to roll the changes back. They're getting an idea of what changes we'd be able to deal with and enjoy so we can be more happier with our AT.

[ QUOTE ]
This technically isn't possible with our engine. It would have to be a huge animated texture refreshing at 20+ frames per second.

We did think of it, but the engineers' eyeballs popped out of their sockets when we suggested it.

[/ QUOTE ]

How about a TV that cycles shots from different cameras?

I think the Q&A on Slashdot was much more interesting than this crappy article. I don't blame States for the article, I blame the guy who wrote it who can't get his facts straight.

Oh no! Statesman is back and I fear for his safety.