-
Posts
11059 -
Joined
-
Quote:I won't post them. I consider myself at least partially guilty because one of the reasons those characters were made was to bait those types of players, so I have some responsibility for the blow ups.I've yet to see any on the Rude Tells thread, Drunk Squirrel.

*taps foot impatiently*
The other reason was to prove, even if it's only to myself, that those characters can kick a$$ even if their "gimped".
I also haven't been on those particular characters in a few months. I've been beta testing STO.
Edit: Sides, M_B is right, it's not my place to teach them a lesson so I really should start working on making dual builds for them. It's easy to justify your actions to yourself, but when shown in the light of public opinion they look like excuses for acting petty. -
-
I guess I should have responded to this issue but I didn't think it would have been a concern here because it wasn't the topic of the thread.
All of my "gimped" buff characters are dedicated soloists, and I don't make any secret that I can't help with buffs. For example . . .

My Kin, Bubbler, & Sonic all have similar comments.
Despite my warnings in search and when I flat out tell them I can't heal, bubble, buff there are people that still choose to ignore me and beg me to join their teams.
At that point after making sure they were warned I'll relent and accept their team invite knowing full well what's coming. Soon the heal me's, buff me's, start coming in and I just laugh because they ain't getting what I ain't got.
Does this make me a jerk? Probably, but I don't care. I hate build nazi's and people that refuse to take no for an answer. They came to me and they ignored what I told them. Maybe next time they'll pay attention.
Some have even threatened to petition me for not taking those powers. I wish them the best of luck with that because my chat logs show I told them I didn't have those powers. -
Way to go Quinch. Don't worry about the people that don't understand why you want to do this. I've been kicking around a similar idea myself for RP reasons in different zones. I've got a few to almost the levels I want.
-
Quote:The devs have told us that the money they got from all the extras that are sold for the game have helped pay for speedier releases of issues. Start taking that money away and we'll have to wait longer for new stuff. Boosters, server transfers, rename tokens, and respecs all contribute.Honestly while server transfers do make some income I figure that the cost is less about income and more to make sure that you are really serious about changing servers. Limiting transfers to those who really want it means that you don't get people switching servers on a whim which can be disruptive to server communities.
-
-
Quote:two things, 1)most drive by buffers buff and leave giving you no time to say anything back. sometimes you dont even get a name because your doing something.
2)just because a buffer believes he's helping doesnt mean he actually is! i want your buffs in a team(never SB) i dont want your buffs when im in oro or at the market or in the univ. people that think that buffing is good, random buff everyone. that thinking needs to go away. times change, buffers mindsets should too!
Please disregard anything said by the person quoted. He doesn't like this game and it's a good chance he's only posting here because he has an agenda.
http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showt...34#post2559134Quote:dont lose your friends stay with WOW or DDO they are way more fun and you can acctually team there. this game is dead, already unsubed, havent found a team in a month. just wished i hadnt bought the yr sub but a lesson learned. moving on to a better MMO (pick one) they are all better and more enjoyable!this game is a dead horse and please for the love of all things DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYONE ON THIS FORUM WHO IS FORUM CARTEL(FLAMING CARTEL)9/10 TIMES WILL FLAME YOU!!! for you people staying- i'm sorry for you.for those leaving the dead zone of cov, enjoy the more pleasurable play of live mmos! -
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunny_Slippers
My thoughts?
No
No
No
Hell No,
and...um...
oh yeah.....NO
Just because you have trouble teaming doesn't mean the rest of us do.
Also, the Search Feature is your friend.Quote:Originally Posted by Adeon Hawkwood
Wow, is it that time of the month already?
Dr. Incedible, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you don't normally read the forums but this idea has been discussed many, many times and the general concensus amognst forumites is that it would be a bad idea. If you use the search feature you can probably find the last few threads on the subject (please don't necro them but they have the general arguments against it).Quote:Originally Posted by Ad Astra
A rhetorical question (without a ?, even) does not make the topic appropriate to Player Questions.
The real question here seems to be "Is it that time of the month again?" to which the answer appears to be "looks like it is".
OP - no thank you.Quote:Why server consolidation is not a good idea.
Welcome to the forum. You have posted one of the oft repeated suggestions, "Consolidate the servers."
Disclaimer
Yes. This is a cut and paste reply that I keep handy, as well as a quick bit of instruction on how to search. Neither are meant to cause fights or to be insulting. The search instructions are in, not just because forum rules say flat out to search, but to help you and anyone else reading this use the search tool effectively.
The body of the cut and paste reply is the way it is because we've seen these arguments numerous times before. They're a summary of the salient points that come up each time. They are not here to insult you, make you feel stupid or otherwise "bring you down a peg." Instead, they are meant as instruction and information. Please read through the points and the explanation behind them to see the issues that are commonly brought up in response. They may not always match your suggestion 100% - in fact, you may have explained around one or two of them - but they're there for consideration and refinement of your idea.
Yes, I do look forward to the time, with some of these suggestions, that someone not only addresses all the points, but does so exceptionally well. It'll probably be added to the end of the cut/paste reply, with credit. For now, though, read and consider the points. They really are just there to help you, and move discussion along to help ideas evolve.
If you're going to see this and say an "evil forum vet is just shooting down your idea," or "You think you're the last word because of your post count," you're wrong. Heck, if you say the second, you've just worried more about my post count than I have in the last four plus years. Tongue-in-cheek comments in here are meant as hummor, not put downs.
TL,DR section.
First, my stock answer, one which I stand by and repeat with all due fervor. HELL NO.
Searching effectively
1. Click on "Search" up at the top of the forum.
2. On the left, under "Forum(s) to search," select "Suggestions and ideas."
3. On the right, Keyword Search Terms. This is probably where your problem was if you did search. Try the following, exactly as typed:
+server -pvp -"re: "
This will search for anything with "Server" in the title, including Servers, Combine Servers, Consolidate Servers, and The Server At Mcdonalds Is Rude. it will eliminate "PVP," so you won't see PVP server requests, and the -re: portion of it removes replies, so you'll see the root of every thread that comes up, letting you see just how many threads there are on this. (The last helps for other subjects, as well.)
4. Click the "In subject" radio button. This is a search, not a cute blonde in a bikini. Here, you want to ignore the body.
5. Leave Username Search blank.
6. Date range, Newer Than, change the 1 to a 3, and the time to Months.
7. Result format doesn't matter. Click on "Submit."
As I try this now, (12/3/08,) we have:
Consolidate Server
Server Stats RSS Feed
$server modifier ofr chat
Fix the forum server
Earlyissue server
Merging low population server
Combine slow server
Server status
Global chat on the Character and Server Screens
Rated M server
Add Ponies, Nerf Vills, merge Servers, PistolMelee
Server Visiting
Display Central Time on Server Status Page
Ignoring the smartalec reply, that's three full discussions about this topic.
You should have read one of them if (inevitably) something similar comes up in your search.
Now, on to the topic at hand....
Why server consolidation is not a good idea.
1. Just because YOU like living in New York City doesn't mean I can't like Kansas.
Yay, you love having huge lag spikes as you get near the black market/wentworths and a busy broadcast. Congrats. Enjoy Freedom. Some of us - many of which you will get replies from with this subject - like *low population* servers. If we *wanted* to be on Freedom, we'd *be* on Freedom.
I have characters on Freedom. I rarely play them (and actually moved a character OFF of Freedom to finish leveling it to 50) because *I DON'T LIKE FREEDOM.* I dislike the banality of broadcast, the high percentage of *horrid* teams I've come across there, the lag around any gathering point- and I've got a decent connection and system. For much the same reason, I typically startin Galaxy City instead of Atlas Park - I don't *want* to log in to a costume contest with several 50s spamming powers and nonsense arguments in broadcast.
Some of us *like* nice, quiet servers.
2, Kansas, part 2.
In addition, servers have their own personalities. No, I don't mean that literally, there's no AI to worry about if you start hearing "Daisy, Daisy" over your speakers or headset. Freedom's a crowded mess. Virtue is the RP server. Pinnacle is the "Drunk" server. Others have specific communities, such as those from Australia/NZ, Europe, etc.
3. "I only saw one other person. World of Conancraft has eleventy billion!"
So what?
We don't run around camping spawn points in this game. People are in missions. People are spread across many zones. Search on a map or do a /whoall and you'll miss those in missions, as well as those who are, for whatever reason, on /hide. Your "search" there didn't give you a full picture, not in the least.
I understand the "feel" of things being "not very populated," but take a good look around when you're in game. Typically, you don't really have a lot of visibility. Standing in steel canyon, there could be multiple, full 8 person groups surrounding you, and it's likely you'd never see them. We have buildings, walls, architecture, trees and more limiting our visibility. Yes, it can make you feel more alone... but that's rarely the case. Add to that that the population is spread between many, MANY zones, most quite large, and among two sides... well...
4. "I put up my LFT flag and nothing happened!"
Learn to search. Don't just wait. Form a team yourself.
5. "I AM SPARTACUS!" No, not any more.
Remember logging in and seeing all those slots? Everyone has those - some buy more than the base 12, you get an extra one each year, you could have a total of 36 on any server. Everyone does. Every one has a character with a unique name. Maybe not a *good* name, but a unique one. Every one has a character with a unique name. Maybe not a *good* name, but a unique one.
Now merge servers. Suddenly, CoolBlasterDude from server 1 is getting merged with CoolBlasterDude from Server 2. Who gets to keep their name? Nobody has been able to answer this with any degree of satisfaction. Add a number? But I am NOT CoolBlasterGuy1. And what if the name's too long? Does the older character keep it? What if they're not as active?
People are *VERY* attached to their names. They are, quite obviously, part of their character.
6. "This Is SPARTA!" Sorry, Sparta exists already. You are GenericSG 8734 287 9798.
What else has a name? Supergroups. And I can *guarandamntee* that the same name is in use on multiple servers. Sometimes it's 'branches' of the same SG, sometimes it's coincidence. But with *everything* involved in an SG - from its identity and reputation on the server, to everything stored in the database about what it owns, what its base is like and such, this would be a disaster in the making. And no, auto merging them when the servers merge, even if they have room to, is not an option.
This, of course, assumes that they *CAN* move supergroups as a unit. More than likely, it'd just be a mass character move, with bases, prestige, anything stored in bases and all SG affiliations just gone forever.
7. "I am... where'd Spartacus go?"
Remember all those slots? Well, you start with 1/3 of the available ones. You can buy up to 36 total (24 on top of the ones you get initially.) Now, what do you suppose would happen if you merged two servers, and someone has, say, 20 characters on each? Not unusual. In fact, before those extra slots, I had *filled up* several servers. Do those characters just disappear? Do they move? Free move to another server sounds great, right... well, except you now kick them from their supergroup, remove them from their friends lists and more. This makes for angry and unhappy customers. Or rather, ex customers.
8. I will play where I damn well want to. And you can too.
And that should be blunt enough. If I want a crowded server, I'll go to Freedom. If I want an RP server, I'll go to Virtue. I do NOT want to be shoved onto another server I *don't* like. If I wanted to go there, *I'd be there.*
If the server you're on isn't "busy" enough for you, you have two options that won't bother anyone else.
(A) If it's low enough, reroll. You have a ton of character slots for a reason.
(B) If you don't want to reroll, server transfers are available, and relatively cheap. They also finish fast - you should be up and running and being spammed to join someone's SG on the new server in a few minutes, in most instances. So YOU can go to the server of YOUR choice without screwing ME over.
9. "It'll free up server hardware for Freedom!" No, no it won't.
Freedom, because of the load it tends to have, already has more resources dedicated to it than other servers. And ALL of the servers have been upgraded multiple times. The servers are not allocated exactly the same. The servers that handle less of a load have less dedicated to them.
So this argument doesn't fly.
10. DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
Last but not least (at least until better points come along to be added,) server consolidation is widely viewed in the industry as an MMO going on life support. No, we don't have WoWs numbers (and you should actually pay attention to when and how they got those.) They're an abberation in the MMO industry. COH has had and does have a very successful, sustainable population even at its lowest points, so there's no economic need to combine anything. The flip side of that, of course, has been suggested above - you crowd people together, break up their SGs and friends lists, cause characters to go missing and poeple definitely *will* quit, both out of annoyance and a sense of "The game is almost dead!"
In conclusion....
As stated before, when it comes to server consolidation... HELL NO.
What she said they said.
-
Quote:I always have trouble with names. Some people are just lucky and can name stuff well. Others just don't and I'm one of those. Someone above said all you need is creativity, cleverness and patience; well some might lack one of those so coming to the name portion of the creation process is often the more frustrating part.
Actually although those are terms people use, I think what they are really trying to say is that all it takes is a little bit of effort, and not being stubborn and inflexible about what you want.
For example I have a character based on a burning insect. Common sense told me that when I decided to choose his name I wasn't going to get Firefly. So rather than get mad or stubborn about it I decided to think of alternatives. I settled on hitting an online language translator to see what fire looked like in other languages and settled on Feuerfly. Got it first try. -
6 years and I can count the number of times I didn't get the name I wanted on the first try on one hand.
-
Quote:(tl;dr)
It would be cool, but the problem comes from powers like [No Phase] and [Dampening Field] and all the PvP nerf powers that effect you while in PvP zones, those are there to hinder you on purpose, they wouldn't want to allow you to disable them to get back where you want to be.
Thank you for bringing that up because I tend to block the PvP zones out of my mind. -
This is an isolated incident from years ago, and also why I love the taxibot crew. I was on a team in the Hollows back when it was first released and had just finished a mission up in the far corner. The quickest way across the zone was what we called the "Death Express". You'd run into a mob, die, rez in the Atlas Park Hospital then level up and head back to the Hollows where a teammate would tp friend you back to the next mission entrance.
Well this time there was this person level 30 something on his own that would not let me get killed. He kept hitting me with heals and ignored my requests to stop. So I told the team leader what was happening. He invited the Taxibot on duty who promptly TP'd me to the AP entrance and away from the jerk.
I have to admit we were on Freedom at the time and that might have had something to do with it. -
We are the Americans. Existence, as you know it, is over. We will add your characters and your servers to our own. Resistance is futile.
-
Quote:Actually I think this boils down better to:
"OMG, why are there other people playing this game with me!"
The whole thing is full of QQ.
If you don't like buffs, suck it up people aren't mind readers and its not inherently wrong to help other people. Go street sweeping in empty zones instead of say, in Atlas or Steel. If you're REALLY concerned try joining one of the lesser populated servers and play during a lull period.
The world isn't going to end because someone ruined a couple minutes of your "fun". If you can't get past that you have some serious anger/emotional issues and probably shouldn't be playing a game to begin with.
I mean it would be like me throwing a hissy fit because a guy opened a door for me. Sure I can open the door myself, I may have even felt empowered by doing it on my own, but the world isn't going to end because it happened. I'll politely thank him, let him know it wasn't necessary I can do it myself and move on.
The crazy person would throw a hissy fit to the guy's face about how he's ruining her life and treating her like she can't do anything for herself. Quite a few people in this thread are throwing hissy fits and being crazy over something that really just doesn't matter.
And the point? You don't even get debt at level 4, worst case scenario you had to hike again to the mission door. Oh the humanity.
Oh the sweet irony. In one breath they argue that the random acts of kindness are because they care and want to help their fellow players, then turn around and in the next breath they declare, "deal with it" because they don't care about you.
-
Quote:Honestly even if someone was in an SG called "don't buff me" I probably wouldn't even notice. I have no issues not re-buffing someone if they ask me not to, but I think I've only ever had one person complain about a drive-by buff in the 39 months I've been playing.
If you ask nicely not to buff you that's one thing, but this whole "you should never buff anyone because it interferes with my playstyle" thing seems more like a one-man crusade to have everyone play your way. You can't expect everyone who comes by to not buff you, and yelling at them for it is just pointless instigation.
This is why I think the most peaceful way for the devs to resolve this would be to give people the ability to choose to accept/block buffs. Then the people that don't want buffs can set their toggles and go on their merry and the good samaritans can play the way they like. Everyone's happy. There'll be no more nerdraging on the forums about "I hate SB's" or "Suck it up Princess". Every time the devs have given us the ability to block something in game the number of complaints drop to almost zero.
I rarely see arguments anymore about blind invites, PL/Farm spam, RMT spam since we got the ability to
Block invites - Set your flag to red
/hide from searches
Block emails from people not on your friends list -
Quote:Thanks for proving my point FourSped.So, when you get drive-by buffed, suck it up sunshine, because sensible
players aren't going to give your whiny approach a second thought, and
there isn't a GM in the game who's going to consider that griefing...
Carry On.
4
The venom and bile expressed above is an example of the type of person that would go out of his or her way to harrass someone with a drive-by buff if they saw that someone was in an SG named "No Buffs Please".
He or she wouldn't be stupid enough to stand there and spam unwanted buffs on one person repeatedly because that could get them nailed for griefing. No it would always be an "accident" every time they saw someone in that SG. -
Quote:... buh?
So, if you saw someone with a "No buffs please" title and you asked, explaining why, you don't think they'd invite you?
That's an assumption. *shrug* True for some, not true for others.
And, again, shared membership - you don't have to do anything as an SG, heck, don't even need a base if you can find a willing coalition or two.
And I'll point out, again - not that this is really directed at you, more that it is at Kat's comments earlier - the difference between the griefing I mentioned and the "Doing anything to me at all without my express consent is griefing me" attitude.
Oh I know nothing here is personally directed at me. I just wanted to show that it's easy to view the way that one thing that was being said in a negative light.
I am often guilty of saying things in a manner that gets taken the wrong way, and just as often I don't realize it until it gets pointed out to me.
I only meant that the SG thing is far from a perfect solution. It's also why I used the () because there no way for me to even guess at how many people happily join such SG's and how many would insist on solo versions of the SG's.
Oh and on the topic of griefing, we can't always rely on griefers being stupid enough to spam grief on one person frequently enough to justify reporting.
With a "No Buffs Please" SG we could easily see people doing something along these lines.
Jerk 1: (tell) Hey look at that there. Teh SG name is No Buffs Pls. Watch this.
Jerk 1 then buffs the guy
Jerk 1: (Broadcast) Oh Sry! Didn't see the SG name.
Jerk 2: (tell) Rofl! Wait I'm next!
Jerk 1: (tell) noob should lrn2play! let's go see if there are any others around.
Obviously there is no way for us to guess how often things like that happen even now, but an SG name like that could draw that kind of behaviour.
I'd much rather a unobtrusive toggle rather than a sign.
-
Quote:If it's that important that everyone know 24/7 you don't want to be buffed, create an SG called No Buffs Please and coalition it with your current SG. That way you will *always* have that sign over your head. Or at least in your target info.
And yes, way back when Sonic had its original (nausea/headache/seizure inducing) graphics, I did indeed throw a "main" character or two into the SG "No Sonic Buffs TY" (or something similar, the group obviously doesn't exist now.)
Of course, that was a health issue, not a "I don't like it and you're a jerk for trying to help" matter. Even so, the responsibility was on *me* to tell people I didn't want that particular buff. I didn't assume that everyone running around with their (then-new) sonic characters was trying to "ruin my gameplay" or "play the game for me," and wouldn't know that that particular buff made me physically ill. It was on *me* to tell them - which was always done politely. So my telling Kat (et al) that they shouldn't assume, that the responsibility is on them, is not just... oh, "theoretical." It's something I, at one point, had to put into practice.
Edit: And yes, I ran through the entire gamut, people asking why (which would usually get an "Oh, I didn't know" after a bound explanation,) people apologizing, and exactly one person who *was* griefing, who even said in a /t (which got copied into the harassment /petition) that he'd keep doing it to me because "it was funny" - note the difference between the intent there which *does* make that griefing.)
The SG idea did occur to me but sadly that would mean only 11 people (4 if they are EU players) could have such an SG. Add to the fact that a lot (not all) of the people that don't want any type of buff for any reason tend to be solo players they aren't going to be the type that want to share an SG with other people.
The number of ways to say "no buffs please" is very limited and it's very likely the number of players that would like to block buffs is greater than the number of variations available as SG names.
Also while you only ecountered one person that griefed you when you had the sonic issue, other people aren't that lucky. For example take a look at some of Psychoti's posts down in the rude tells thread. That guy is a magnet for jerks.
Just think about it Bill, if I were to come over to you and do something you found irritating and when you asked me to stop I said, "Look I did this because I'm a good Samaritan and what I did is for your own good. Furthermore if I see you in the same situation in the future I'm going to do it again because it's for your own good, and I like helping people whether they want my help or not. If you really don't want my help then carry a sign that tells me not to help you." Now seriously tell me you wouldn't think of me in a less than positive light.
Now personally the only drive by buffers that bug me are the ones that do it when it isn't necessary or repeatedly after they've been politely asked to stop, but I can accept that there are people that are more sensitive about the issue. -
Quote:First off Wendy, Please please please understand that this is not directed at you personally. You just happen to be the latest person to say something along these lines and I'd like to address it.I'm sorry if my wanting to help interferred with the fun of a trip to the hospital and maybe getting to work of debt because your patrol XP ran out has ruined the game for you. Get a BIG sign and paste it on the back of your cape saying "HEY LEAVE ME ALONE I CAN DO THIS MYSELF" and I will continue on my way while you expire.
In order to assist those people that don't want any "help" from drive-by buffs, please explain step by step how they can get this sign everyone keeps telling them to get.
Can they get it at the tailor? If so explain exactly where in the costume creator it can be found.
Is it a title? If so what level do you have to be to unlock it? Or do you get it from a contact? Who is this contact and where can it be found?
Do you get this sign from a badge? Is it part of an accolade that has to be unlocked?
Well? . . .
Still waiting . . . -
Quote:Absolutely. If the devs thought something was seriously good for the game, they might do it even if none of the players wanted it.
Sometimes, if they think a feature is decent and easy to implement, they might slip it in even if only a few people want it.
It's when a feature is non-trivial to fit in that they would have to take a hard look at how many people it really benefited. I'm not saying a general buff prompt would be non-trivial to implement - I have no idea. But if it is non-trivial for some reason, it would surprise me if it was the kind of thing they would set aside time for on the basis of demand.
But hey, how many people wanted the ability to turn off XP?
My only hope is that if it is something non-trivial it will at least be something they have on the shelf and work on from time to time so that we might see it implemented at some point in the future when they discover that they are a little short on an issue and decide to finish it off and throw it in the game.
-
Quote:I understand what you're saying. The point i was making is that the size of the group making the request isn't always a motivator for why the devs add or remove features to the game. They do what they think is best for the game as a whole.Then again, it's hard to ask for something removed you don't realize is there. Most people who kicked off the threads asking for the removal had already run afoul of the cutoff. That probably didn't happen to that many people.
Just because folks who dislike unsolicited buffs are a larger group than that tiny minority doesn't suggest that they're a big enough minority to spur dev action. -
Quote:No problem. I understood that your son's account is inactive, I just mentioned it because there really was no need to go to the trouble of creating an entirely new account then create a throw-away character just to do some invites/transfers.Well, I was unaware that the forums here trimmed quote tunnels automatically. It was really more a response to the person who was being quoted by the poster I quoted, and I just included both for completeness sake.
This was really more what I was talking about in clarifying that my son's account was inactive.
There's also the benefit that by reactivating your son's account, even if only for a month, is that he might find some spare time during the time it's active and could jump on his account for some relaxing gaming. -
More people have voiced their desire to block buffs over the years than people complained that they wanted the 60 day rule removed from the Market because they were too lazy to log into their characters at least once every 60 days.
-
Yes I do.

Level 27 Earth Control / Empathy Controller who only has Healing Aura in his secondary powerset. He's filled his choices from Flight, Fitness, and Leadership. According to the Hero Planner I can get to 50 with only the Aura.
Then there my 22 Bubble Def that only has PFF, Force Bolt, and Dispersion Bubble.
My 28 Sonic Def with Sonic Siphon and Sonic Dispersion
My 29 Rad/Rad that doesn't have any Rad buffs.
And finally my 50 kin def with Transfusion, Siphon Speed, Repel, Inertial Reduction, and Fulcrum Shift. -
Gee it makes me want to log onto one of me buffless defenders/controllers and accept invites to teams looking for buffers and watch them have fits when they find out my characters have no buffs.
