CactusBrawler

Legend
  • Posts

    2137
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aneko View Post
    You can play Incarnate characters on someone else's account.

    You can build a fort out of your GR box, too.

    No you can't EULA says that's a no no.

    And we in the EU didn't get a box for GR.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aneko View Post
    Sit in the road with your driver's license and see how far you get without a car.

    You can get a car without a driver's license.

    Edit: You can also use your driver's license without a car.
  3. If while you are reshuffling the forums you can fix the log in bug, I'll listen to the next three tangents you do on Ustream with out turning you over to KC and the sunshine band Zwill.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post

    If you go out and buy CoV today, it refers to features that no longer exist, like base raiding. That's why the boxes also have a disclaimer on them about online features being subject to change.

    All well and good, EU players didn't get a box though.

    EU players got a pre-purchase option, while the devs said GR would include the alpha slot/first level of incarnates though.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by The_Prismist View Post
    When I bought City of Heroes there were Kheldions. Should I get those for free? When player X bought City of Heroes there was a mission architect, should they get that for free?

    I'd say they should get Mission Architect if they bought the Mission Architect version.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Schismatrix View Post
    And yet they routinely do from the early levels on.
    Mostly because they're dumber than bricks and need to "cheat" to present any sort of challenge at all. That said, the issue is more with the stacking of overpowered abilities and/or abilities that effectively hamstring many ATs and builds on base difficulty. Those types of mobs are much rarer and more annoying.

    Actually the reason why some mobs have better versions of player powers, is they have the legacy version that players used to have but player powers get nerfed, mob powers don't.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by LadyGrimrose View Post
    Actually, the devs apologized in the beta and on the live forums that the Preview for the Incarnate system would not be in Going Rogue and had been postponed due to player feedback. The word Preview is paramount here as it is The word taste in the Pax slides. Both mean sneak peak and only that.

    So is 'first level'.

    You know, the Alpha slot. There are three bullet marks for Going Rogue, when Posi talks about the Incarnate system.
  8. I'd be some what molified if I got another Paragon Reward Token, for purchasing GR, I'd be on tier 9 already if they'd not of messed up on the whole 'pre-paid time ='s up front reward tokens' that they'd said they'd do.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aneko View Post
    Not at all. If they saw that it was planned, didn't realize that it wasn't set in stone, and missed the announcement of the change, that's a shame, but that's all it is.

    They still released Alpha slot though, it still required GR, it just didn't come out the day of GR's release.

    It's not like Blizzard's Dance studio, something that was said to be part of expansion and never released.

    It was delayed a bit.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Schismatrix View Post
    Analogies becoming progressively more contorted, distorted, inaccurate, and irrelevant.
    Points being missed or ignored by a larger and larger margin.
    What was that powerset from the other year that used to get posted in cases like this?

    We're on the verge of a wholesale cognition and logic collapse here, people! Won't anyone think of the (utterly irrelevant) children?!

    Actually despite your rather crude attempts at insult we may have stumbled upon something here.

    Could it be the balls up of the lead dev/devs saying that Alpha slot would be included as part of Going Rogue, is what has caused this massive decrease in information from Paragon? They used to be very chatty, now everything has to go through marketing a dozen times before they can even vaguly hint at it...
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Furio View Post
    Maybe they should have. Not the issue here, though.

    Sure it is. If they didn't refund people who bought GR prior to Alpha slot's removal from the deal, then those peopel still purchased access to the Alpha slot. Hence according to Posi's words, they should keep access to the Alpha slot.

    The rest of the incarnate system? To paraphase various 80's movies, "That wasn't part of the deal!"
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Venture View Post
    I didn't find these arcs to be any different, in any meaningful way, from any other arcs in the game.

    A lot of the old stuff is better than Graves arc from an RP view of the MMORPG.

    The machine can take DNA from a robot?

    Dollface can do her thing to a ghost? A robot? A golem? A sentient forum post?
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Furio View Post
    Regardless of what they said during the marketing, what was there at release is what was there. You can't claim "it was going to be in the release, but it's not" should count the same as "it's in the release".

    And in this specific case what was going to be there was simply rolled back into the free issue that contained the meat of the system.

    Then they should of refunded all pre-purchases no? Because what people bought from them ,turned out to be different to what they recived. Their are a metric ****-ton of laws against that by the way.

    "I sold you prime cod, but we didn't have cod, enjoy your flatfish"
  14. Mobs really shouldn't have abilties much more powerful than the players version, unless they are encoutnered one on many, an IncTrial boss, or AV for example.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Furio View Post
    Your specific reason for the purchase isn't a factor. Access to Incarnate content is dependent on owning GR, but it was *not* a part of GR.

    The first level was, as said by Positron and Warwitch, but they they are just/were lead devs of Paragon Studios, what do they know?

    Hmm quandry for some of you, if the devs are always right and thus we never got Alpha as part of going rogue according to latest information, were the devs wrong when they said it was?

    Kinda of hard to defend the devs, when you are calling them simpletons in the same sentance isn't it?
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mr. DJ View Post
    I'd be content if I was able to still get the numerical values while not getting the set bonuses. But...it's probably <standard coding rant here>

    For IO's I'd prefer for PReemium's that if they were slotted they still worked, but didn't give a set bonous, but yeah. Code and all that.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gangrel_EU View Post

    Note: If you pre bought Going Rogue *BEFORE* the PAX annoucement (end of March) then more fool you to be honest, because there was *no* official announcement either here or there that i can find that stated that Incarnates were going to be included with Going Rogue....

    According to TY, the period where where GR went on sale for Pre-purchase, may of been before the Forum merger.

    Which would explain where quite a crap load of posts about it have gone.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Furio View Post
    wha? I don't follow your meaning here. I know all of these words, but the order isn't making any sense. No sarcasm intended. I literally don't know what you're asking.

    Before they 'removed' (delayed actually) it, it was included, for close to a year of pre-purchases (As in you give them the full money of going rogue) it was included. They said it at pax, War witch said it at the aniversry and when it was 'delayed' due to feed back Positron appologised.

    I'm asking that if you buy something that includes a feature, but that feature has to be delayed at the point of release, do you conlude that said feature wasn't actually included in the first place?
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Furio View Post
    Which they then removed, during beta.....cuz it's a beta and things change.

    Soit's aprantly okay for them to delay something they've already sold you from the sale, and you to not have actually purchased it when they return it?
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aneko View Post
    During part of Beta.

    Would be a valid point, but they sold it to people before the beta.

    Not put up for pre-order.

    Sold to, for full price.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TwoHeadedBoy View Post
    Doesn't Golden Girl do so much to contribute to legitimate conversation?

    It was some how more annoying when I had her on ignore, they really need to change the ignore feature so you can't see that an ignored player has posted at all.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aquila_NA View Post
    REALLY? Is that why every post has a different "Re:" than it did this afternoon? Whoa!
    It's Golden Girl, what do you expect?
  23. I really hope to ******* god they don't change the currency.

    It's hard enough getting a particular trial on union, now that so many people are playing new /time or beam rifle, alts.

    Let alone when you want to do a BAF but the other four people who could allow you to run the BAF all need to do Tyrant's beach house, and two more need to run Tyrant's shower.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gangrel_EU View Post
    Followed up by "The players wanted everything for free, and so didnt pay a penny" at 01:00am

    BTW, i notice that you havent been able to supply evidence of Incarnate stuff being promised with Going Rogue...

    Funny enough Gangrel hun, I've been at work.
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aneko View Post
    A business tries to make money. Film at 11.

    Followed up by the sequal "A business tries to make money 2: oooops how did we fail?" at 12.45 am.