Zikar

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    1505
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Coin View Post
    Still annoyed that the US gets a BBC made show first though.
    Isn't this at least partly funded by a US company?

    Although, I must say that waiting almost a week is very, very annoying.
  2. I'd agree that The Prisoner probably just squeezes in to Sci-Fi.

    Actually, I say it's more Sci-Fi than Quantum Leap.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Clouded View Post
    What does this have to do with doc's post?
    I suppose it's the general inference that since it wasn't successful in the US, it's success was small and the only way to have great success is to be successful in the US.

    I'd like to find viewing figures for Star Trek actually, but I can't.

    Edit: Not that I want to get involved in this argument particularly, I love Star Trek too!
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Traegus View Post
    ummmm, then you would only be considering the UK, where as Star Trek has a MUCH bigger following world wide. i personally prefer the Doctor, but if we're going to pick nits, then lets pick them right.
    That's arguable, since Doctor Who was shipped to many countries in it's original run and still is to this day.

    Additionally, the Guinness Book of World Records gave it the record of most successful Sci-Fi show of all time based on "broadcast ratings, DVD sales, book sales and iTunes traffic."

    As for whether Time Travel makes something Sci-Fi. No. No it doesn't, especially if the means for Time Travel isn't a machine of some sort, but rather a vague supernatural effect.
    There is far more magic that "science" in Lost.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Quasadu View Post
    Depends on the criteria for "best." If we're including lasting legacy in that, then Star Trek would be #1 in my opinion.
    Only if you consider America. Doctor Who has had a much bigger impact in Britain than Star Trek.
  6. Why is Lost included in Sci-Fi all the time (it's not just this list). It's generally a straight forward action-drama with the occasional bit of mysticism. There's almost no science fiction in it at all.
  7. Zikar

    UFO over the UK

    The first two videos are clearly fakes, probably some viral marketing campaign. It's interesting that the first two videos are both shot in crystal clear 720p and that there is a lack of amateur video (As in, from phones and the like) from something that was clearly seen by many people.

    The 3rd video seems to be an entirely different phenomenon but moves like something that's easily terrestrial in nature.

    So, yeah.
  8. I couldn't finish Silmarillion.

    I should try again some day, now I'm a bit older.
  9. Just something I've ben thinking, not aimed at anyone in this thread, just a general musing.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Grey Pilgrim View Post
    As it is, he still could not be defeated short of destroying the Ring.
    A lot of people who point out "problems" with the book or films often say "Why don't they just hide the Ring somewhere impossible to get to, like in the middle of the sea" or something.
    What they seem to forget is that Sauron had already raised one hell of an army, it stopped Sauron acting directly, or regaining most of his power, but his armies could still kill off a huge number of people or even win.

    Oh and by the way, got mah Blu-Rays this morning
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Grey Pilgrim View Post
    I haven't heard much about the Blu Ray stuff for Lord of the Rings... is there going to be much extra from the DVDs? I don't have a Blu Ray player (and I wouldn't want to sink more money into yet another version of those films), but I am curious.
    As far as I am aware the Blu-Rays, both Theatrical and Extended additions, have all the same extras as their DVD counterparts.

    The main advantage is simply that you can now watch the films themselves in glorious 1080p.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    Oh yeah......HOWARD STARK is listed. Given how among Howard's possessions that Tony was given in IM2 was an unfinished Captain America shield, I wonder if Howard Stark will have a hand developing the shields in this movie?
    Have you been watching the trailers? Howard's been in them a bit and been referred to by name.
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CaptainFoamerang View Post
    Extended edition Blu-Ray's coming in less than 48 hours!

    (sorry, just needed a place to express my excitement about this, carry on >.>)
    Mine shipped on Sunday (somehow) Amazon says it'll be here tomorrow.

    Here's hoping!
  13. To be honest, I always thought it was a bit weird in the Hobbit. The Necromancer is kind of built up via foreshadowing and then never materialises. Later Gandalf is all like "Yeah, got caught up fighting him, that's why I haven't been around." and it's like "Huh... okay."

    You almost get the feeling Tolkien was going to have something with him then forgot.

    I don't have a problem with them following Gandalf's story in the film, rather than Bilbo's exclusively.

    Having said that, I'd have preferred if they'd got all of the Hobbit out of the way in one film and made the second film about other things, such as Gandalf's trip and what not.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
    He was the best of the FF.
    Nah, I think that goes to Michael Chiklis as the Thing.

    Quote:
    "When we did 'Captain America,' you're the only superhero on set," but when he saw the other stars in their costumes [on the set of 'The Avengers'] it was "the first time I really kind of geeked out."
    That sounds really awesome, just thinking of RDJ, Hemsworth and Evens all standing around in their costumes makes me sqee.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ZephyrWind View Post
    They might have dropped the ball a little with Thor (I'm sorry, but the best part of that movie was the assistant that kept referring to his hammer as "MeowMeow").
    It's like you're anti-logic!
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Chyll View Post
    (However, another in a long string of trailers that pretty much just tell the entire story in 2 minutes... what happened to the tease?)
    To be fair, the basic story of Cap is around 60 years old now.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
    Also, he's on the far left of this photo. I don't think anyone needs to be told what film this is from.

    I'm just a dude playing a dude pretending to be another dude!
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Clave_Dark_5 View Post
    Neither are stand-out stories, but they weren't Horns Of Nimon level trash.
    Oh, don't say stuff like that, I'm currently buying/watching all the classic Doctor Who stuff on DVD, Nimon is one of the ones coming up soon on my list!
  19. Quote:
    with Robert Downey Jr. returning to the role of Tony Stark/Iron Man.
    Woo!
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dante View Post
    The only highlight of that episode was:

    WOULD. YOU. LIKE. A. CUP. OF. TEA!!!???
    I'm prepared to say that the first half is okay, with everyone in the bunker, then it just kind of all falls apart once the "new" Daleks turn up, with their horrible designs and a bomb that disarms itself with the power of love.
  21. Another thing you have to remember is that NuWho's episodes are longer than classic Who, plus Classic Who could certainly buy time a lot (a lot of 6 parters could easily have been 4 parters if they cut out a lot of stuff).

    I'd like to see a nice mix of the two styles one day.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    They work better in an atmosphere of extended suspense, in which their implacable plotting mounts, e.g. Dalek Invasion of Earth, Genesis of the Daleks, rather than delivering shocks, e.g. Victory of the Daleks, Daleks in Manhattan.
    Hmm, I don't know about that...

    While I certainly agree with you to a degree, I'm not sure about your examples.
    Dalek Invasion of Earth certainly has it's "shock" moments, such as the Dalek rising from the Thames (a truly iconic moment), the Dalek spaceship trying to kill Barbara in a van and the final assault on the Dalek base. Also, Genesis of the Daleks, ironically was barely even a Dalek story, with Davros completely stealing the show. The Daleks were basically just background props for that story.

    I also think Daleks in Manhattan gets a lot of undue flack and I would consider it to be pretty close to a classic Dalek story, with the Daleks working from behind the scenes on an unknown plan in part 1 and then the backstabbing in part 2.

    Everyone agrees that Victory of the Daleks was pretty bad though.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    I doubt that new Who, for all its pleasures, will ever be as frightening for children as it once was for the simple reason that the new format simply doesn't generate as much suspense as the old serial.
    I dunno, I consider NuWho to have some genuine nightmare fuel, the Ganger's episodes are a good example of this I feel. If kids weren't scared by those monsters, I worry for this generation.