Zikar

There were two, the first, Dr. Who and the Daleks, based off of William Hartnel's first Dalek story. It was quite popular at the time, considering it was audience's first chance to see Daleks in colour!
The second film was called Daleks: Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. based off of the second William Hartnel story with the Daleks, the Dalek invasion of Earth.
That film wasn't very good, in fact I'd say it was pretty bad. Anyway, it didn't do well at all and a plan to made a third film based on The Chase was scrapped.

Of interest, the second film featured a policeman played by a young Bernard Cribbins, who would later go on to play Wilf alongside the 10th Doctor.

Another interesting fact is that many of the Dalek props used in the TV series were actually bought from the movie production.

The insects are being lit with lights (likely not deliberately) they don't go behind the white building, you just can't see them in front of it.
It's like dust in a sun beam, you have a beam of light and a dark background and every bit of dust is lit up. Flood the whole room with light and all the dust becomes invisible.

The "lights" is just the light hitting the wings coupled with whatever frame rate the video was taken at. You get a similar effect with car wheels seems to revolve backwards on film.

Additionally, the second's "flight path" is identical to a lot of insects.

I remember on one show, they showed a cave drawing that had a bunch of animal paw prints on it. Loads of different ones. They said it was probably a ritual, someone to secure good luck etc.
To me it looked like a teaching aid. Y'know, something you'd show the little ones. "And what animal does this track belong too?".

I'm not saying they're wrong or I'm right, frankly nobody knows, but these experts do seem to have a tendency to really over think things.

It's below his ear on the collar, but it's not as obvious as Ranma-Chan's.

Coulson is a company man, that occasionally means he has to do things that are a bit jerk-like, at least from the perspective of the main characters of the film.

You are so incorrect about a number of things here.
First of all, what he did was legal, as attributed by the fact that he didn't have to go to court. Second, using physical force is not illegal so long as that it is reasonable. What is reasonable is decided on a case by case basis. In this case, physically getting between assailants and victims and pepper spraying the assailants when they attack you is both legal and reasonable force.
The idea that if you see someone being beaten to death you can't restrain the guy doing the beating because you don't have the legal right is ridiculous. Of course you do!

They're not children, they can make they own decisions.

How do you know that? Anyway, the general tactic I saw was to stay well away from any physical confrontation after the fight had been broken up. If the 300lb monster had attempted to attack the cameraman they would have run and he probably would have got a face full of pepper spray for his aggression.

Of course he wants some publicity, he's not from a comic, he wants to show what is going on on the streets and that people can actually make a difference. What do you do if you want to attract attention to your cause? You go on TV, do interviews etc. He's not Batman, trying to strike fear into criminal underworld through scare tactics, he's a guy trying to make a social statement who just happens to have been inspired by superhero fiction.

Not for those people getting beaten up there wasn't. Also, he wasn't doing it thoughtlessly, he was prepared, did everything legally, prevented a beating and managed to do so without harming himself or others.

Bruce has been making a ton of technology and stuff since World War Hulk ended. His most notable inventions include teleporters and energy shields that can withstand attacks from Hulks. All portable of course.
It all comes under the title of Bannertech. This is of course from a guy who doesn't have the resources of the others.

You can't know his motivation, especially since as we pointed out, the camara crew approched him, not the other way around, and having a camera on hand is just good sense. People are less likely to want to be recorded breaking the law, also it keeps an accurate account of what happened.

Of course, on top of all that, who cares what his motivation is? If he helps people, he helps people.

MODOK
Amadeus Cho (Confirmed 7th)
Bruce Banner

But you're utterly missing the actual situation. It doesn't matter that he's patrolling or not, these events are happening regardless of him. The only difference him patrolling makes is that he is there when someone is in need, instead of not being there when someone is in need. That's the only difference, he doesn't make beatings happen, he just comes across them because he's out and about. No different for a guy just out for a walk.

You repeatedly ignore the basic aspect that there was someone in trouble and he was there to help. It doesn't matter one bit that he was out looking for people in trouble, all that that matters is there was and he was there at the time.

As for the camera, that's just common sense. You get a record of everything that happened, footage can be used to identify criminals, license plate numbers, as well as a perfect witness to your, as well as others, actions.

I remember the recent events in New York where that guy got stabbed and he laid there dying for about half an hour as tens of people simply walked passed him.

Another sad indictment on society where helping others is considered a childish fantasy.

But hey, look after number one right? If you do anything else then you're living in cloud cuckoo land.
This isn't about being a "super hero" or dressing up in a costume, it's about a guy witnessing a large group of people beating up a small group and saying "No, I'm not going to let this happen right in front of me." and then doing the right thing by helping his fellow man.

Wrong.
In fact, I'd say it's your duty to do the same. Of course, most people won't because they're too worried about themselves.

Yes he did. He saw someone getting beaten up, that should make it any person's business.

Evidence recording.

His other option, which he succeeded in doing, was to break up the fight without use of physical force, save the people who were being beaten up and wait for the police to arrive to take care of the arresting and such.

That's always the difficult thing, you've got power houses like Thor, Hulk and Iron Man next to guys like Hawkeye and Black Widow (and Captain America who's somewhere inbetween). You have to make them all seem valuable without depowering the strong guys or looking like you're patronising the lesser powered guys.

At least none of these guys actually have secret identities. I'm looking at you Spider-Man.

An entirely different situation.
For instance, you can be naked at home, but not at the local kindergarten.

Wearing a mask outside is not a crime.

Except that nothing he did was actually illegal. Also, it's not vigilantism.
To quote Wikipedia:
A vigilante is a private individual who legally or illegally punishes an alleged lawbreaker, or participates in a group which metes out extralegal punishment to an alleged lawbreaker.
Members of neighborhood watch programs and others who use legal means of bringing people to justice are not considered vigilantes.
Jones is not punishing criminals. He is breaking up fights and calling the police. This is something that any decent person should do. He's just decided to dress up like a super hero while he does it.

I'd say it's the other way around, that there's something wrong with the world when the only people who will help others in need when they see it are those eccentric enough to want to dress up to do it.
It's even and even worse indictment on society when such people are mocked. Jones could well have saved someones life. Street fights aren't like schoolyard scraps between children.

You must have watched an entirely different video.