redo defensive powers so they make interesting play decisions not build decisions


dugfromthearth

 

Posted

ignore enhancements and everything else in the world - pretend there are just 2 resistance powers, one at 60% and one at 30%.

To balance these for power selection you make the 60% one cost END, so you choose 60% costing END or 30% auto. In theory, this makes you choose when you make your character which one you want. In practice you take both and it is a moot point.

For play, you want the reverse. The way resistance works, 60% reduces damage you take by 60%. Stacking an additional 30% reduces the damage you take by 75%. With 60% res you take 40 out of 100 dmg, with 90% res you take only 10.

Now 60% res is enough to solo and even tank on small teams, 30% really is not.
So if 60% is auto, you can choose to run just on that or to pay END to get 90% res.
If on the other hand 30% is auto it is not practical to just run on that and you always pay the END to get 90%.

So to sum up:
With 2 res powers 60% costs END, 30% auto, characters will always take both and always have both on.
With 2 res powers 60% auto, 30% costs end, characters will always take both but sometimes have just one on and sometimes both.

One basically removes all meaningful decisions, the other at least give you a meaningful decision during play.

Ideally I would set this up with 3 res powers: 60% auto, 20% costs END, 10% costs even more end. Then you could choose to take 40% dmg for free, 20% dmg costing end, or 10% for a lot of end. You would really be able to make meaningful decisions during play about END cost vs resistance.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
ignore enhancements and everything else in the world - pretend there are just 2 resistance powers, one at 60% and one at 30%.

To balance these for power selection you make the 60% one cost END, so you choose 60% costing END or 30% auto. In theory, this makes you choose when you make your character which one you want. In practice you take both and it is a moot point.

For play, you want the reverse. The way resistance works, 60% reduces damage you take by 60%. Stacking an additional 30% reduces the damage you take by 75%. With 60% res you take 40 out of 100 dmg, with 90% res you take only 10.

Now 60% res is enough to solo and even tank on small teams, 30% really is not.
So if 60% is auto, you can choose to run just on that or to pay END to get 90% res.
If on the other hand 30% is auto it is not practical to just run on that and you always pay the END to get 90%.

So to sum up:
With 2 res powers 60% costs END, 30% auto, characters will always take both and always have both on.
With 2 res powers 60% auto, 30% costs end, characters will always take both but sometimes have just one on and sometimes both.

One basically removes all meaningful decisions, the other at least give you a meaningful decision during play.

Ideally I would set this up with 3 res powers: 60% auto, 20% costs END, 10% costs even more end. Then you could choose to take 40% dmg for free, 20% dmg costing end, or 10% for a lot of end. You would really be able to make meaningful decisions during play about END cost vs resistance.
Uhm. Okaaaaayyy...

Want to give us a specific reason why this would make any sense and what sort of problem it solves?



Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperstrike View Post
Uhm. Okaaaaayyy...

Want to give us a specific reason why this would make any sense and what sort of problem it solves?
/sign just because I'll gladly take a 60% endurance free res. on my Doms, Blasters, Def, Cors. Screw game balance I want moar now.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperstrike View Post
Uhm. Okaaaaayyy...

Want to give us a specific reason why this would make any sense and what sort of problem it solves?
Hyperstrike pretty much sums up my thoughts on this as well. There's a reason things are the way they are, it's called "balance". You go arbitrarily shifting numbers around, and it throws everything (not just your own character) out of whack.


- Garielle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosty_Femme View Post
I said "ur" which is not a word. It's a sound dumb people make when you ask them to spell out "you are".