VEATs and HEATs


Ad Astra

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulmens View Post
Someone way, way, way up there said


You know what I feel cheapens the acheivement?

Patrol XP.
Lowered XP 10-20 and 40-50.
Half debt in mission.
Half the debt cap, period.
No debt till level 10.
Huge team multipliers for XP.
XP in ouro, XP exemplared, XP redoing TF's for the tenth time with a 5-level-higher set of powers.
Jetpacks at 6, jump packs at 10, anyone can get a jetpack earlier if they really want it.

It took me 300 hours to get my second level 50 and I thought that was pretty fast. for someone who never got PL'd.

Now a fast 50 is ... what, 50 hours?

There. Is. No. Acheivement. There.
Hah, well said, sir.

It took me a long time to get my first 50 blue side and it took me a really, really long time red side (ding'ed 50 3-4 days after i17 was released).
Now, I don't really care what other players do, but for me, I worked hard the past couple of weeks on my brute to get him to 50 before I made a VEAT. Could I have parked him at 45 and waited for i17? Absolutely.
But I wanted to ding 50 out of principle to be able to say I didn't take the easy road for a VEAT. :-P

That's all, carry on. I hope to team with all you newly created Spiders and Widows. :-)



Warning: Undefined variable $userSignature in /var/www/vhosts/cityofheroes.dev/forumarchive.cityofheroes.dev/topic.php on line 334

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulmens View Post
Someone way, way, way up there said


You know what I feel cheapens the acheivement?

Patrol XP.
Lowered XP 10-20 and 40-50.
Half debt in mission.
Half the debt cap, period.
No debt till level 10.
Huge team multipliers for XP.
XP in ouro, XP exemplared, XP redoing TF's for the tenth time with a 5-level-higher set of powers.
Jetpacks at 6, jump packs at 10, anyone can get a jetpack earlier if they really want it.

It took me 300 hours to get my second level 50 and I thought that was pretty fast. for someone who never got PL'd.

Now a fast 50 is ... what, 50 hours?

There. Is. No. Acheivement. There.
/this. Think my first was near 500 hours. And you forgot "newspaper missions, not running out of missions at 38, xp smoothing, set bonuses that give debt reduction" too.


 

Posted

Hasn't really bothered me. Nice to see some more people playing VEATS. I find them one of the most fun ATs you can play.

I've had VEATS/HEATS unlocked for quite awhile before i17 (about 3 years)...and I still haven't gotten into HEATS. Probably because PBs look the most interresting to me, but I hate the lack of mez protection in melee that have (and I dont even care about the lack of knockback, just the hold/sleep/stun).


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

i've had both unlocked for a while, it doesn't bother me, now what would've been super cool beans would be :

-take a page from what AoC just did, an account wide accolade earned when getting both a VEAT and HEAT to 50, it would enable you to autolevel new alts to 20
or
-Get a VEAT and HEAT to 50, and unlock an Preatorian Epic Arch Type


 

Posted

I'm firmly in the camp of people who think the change is fine. Better than fine, it's overdue. Why? Several reasons.

  • The Devs have themselves stated, repeatedly, that having an EAT unlock at fifty was a misstep. It encouraged people to PL to 50 to unlock the EAT and worse, it encouraged perception of the EATs as 'reward' or 'uber' ATs, a misperception which still harms Kheldian popularity today (VEATs too, but less so since they were introduced so much later).
  • Dropping the unlock to 50 removes one more piece of endgame-gated content (opening up all the hazard zones was another big move in this area). This helps to shift the game's focus even more towards alts, which is appropriate since the game's overall design has always been primarily focused on the journey of characters rather than on an ever-increasing carrot-and-stick for max-level characters as in other raid-based MMO endgames.
  • Conversely, removing the unlock from level 50 also helps to reduce the 'endpoint' feeling that level 50 all too often has. Instead of "Now you're 50, go start an EAT!" 50 now becomes simply the max level. Without the immediate carrot of another AT, people may actually be less likely to shelve their 50s. That's, of course, pure speculation.
  • Last but not least, the idea of "cheapening" an achievement is just pride. And it's rather retarded pride at that - it's the same school of thought that has people tormented in fraternities, apprenticeships and training programs all because "I had to do it, so you should have to do it too". That's ridiculous. Yes, it was harder to unlock EATs before and it's easier now. So what. I got to have EATs all this time, that's reward enough, to say nothing of having a max-level character I can call on if I have the need. It doesn't *need* to be harder so that everyone else can *earn* it under the same conditions, any more than we need to bring debt back to the way it was becaues the newer players didn't get to suffer like we did. It's bad logic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooden_Replica View Post
take a page from what AoC just did, an account wide accolade earned when getting both a VEAT and HEAT to 50, it would enable you to autolevel new alts to 20
This, however, I absolutely disagree with. It was a disaster in DoaC and it'd be a disaster here. Probably more of a disaster here given how alt-centric this game's design is. It would depopulate the lower level regions of the game, devalue the lower level game experience, and negatively affect recruitment of new players (something we could use and are poised to get with GR coming out and increased profile of superhero MMOs in general with the launch of DCUO). Naturally it wouldn't destroy the lower level game all at once, but over time the effect would be negative and noticeable. What's more, it also sends the message that veterans don't *have* to play the lower level game, while new players are *forced* to play it. Wow, now it really sounds awful.

Fortunately, given the Dev announcement of all-new 1-20 content in Praetoria, I'm hopeful that they won't even consider making this mistake.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooden_Replica View Post
or
-Get a VEAT and HEAT to 50, and unlock an Preatorian Epic Arch Type
I could get behind that.


With great power comes great RTFM -- Lady Sadako
Iscariot's Guide to the Tri-Form Warshade, version 2.1
I'm sorry that math > your paranoid delusions, but them's the breaks -- Nethergoat
P.E.R.C. Rep for Liberty server

 

Posted

Quote:
The Devs have themselves stated, repeatedly, that having an EAT unlock at fifty was a misstep. It encouraged people to PL to 50 to unlock the EAT and worse, it encouraged perception of the EATs as 'reward' or 'uber' ATs, a misperception which still harms Kheldian popularity today (VEATs too, but less so since they were introduced so much later).
Quote:
Get a VEAT and HEAT to 50, and unlock an Preatorian Epic Arch Type
Quote:
I could get behind that.
Ok, now go back and read the first quote.


Be well, people of CoH.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulmens View Post
You know what I feel cheapens the acheivement?
I have a level 50 who raced from 1 to 50 in three weeks without entering more than ten missions, running through hazard zones, before smoothing, before the changes to set bonuses.

Then he got to 50, and stood alongside the SG leader who didn't know how magnitude works.

The only achievment you can claim in the game is that which lays inside you and all that.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulmens View Post
Someone way, way, way up there said


You know what I feel cheapens the acheivement?

Patrol XP.
Lowered XP 10-20 and 40-50.
Half debt in mission.
Half the debt cap, period.
No debt till level 10.
Huge team multipliers for XP.
XP in ouro, XP exemplared, XP redoing TF's for the tenth time with a 5-level-higher set of powers.
Jetpacks at 6, jump packs at 10, anyone can get a jetpack earlier if they really want it.

It took me 300 hours to get my second level 50 and I thought that was pretty fast. for someone who never got PL'd.

Now a fast 50 is ... what, 50 hours?

There. Is. No. Acheivement. There.
There never was any worthwhile achievement there. Pointless tedium and toil do not an achievement make. Next, let us scoff at indoor plumbing for cheapening the achievement of visiting the outhouse in the middle of a winter's night in twelve feet of snow... uphill... both ways.


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ultrawatt View Post
Now just some dumb *** newb
...any hope of me taking you seriously was gone as soon as I read this. In all honesty, it was gone slightly before that, but that comment solidified my decision.



 

Posted

OP sounds like a fool that I teamed with a couple of days ago, had to boot him off the team after him ranting for a good 10 minutes about "newb" VEATs. I got both my Soldier and Peacebringer to 50 looooong before this switcherooni, yet I see it as a good change, hopefully this'll get more EATs playing!


"Of all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these. It might have been."

 

Posted

I see this as a good thing.

I dunno, my first 50 was a Dark/Dark Defender, way before the buffs. It was brutal and took me ages. More hours than I care to admit

I see the fact that I had to do things a long and unfun way as reason to be in favour of these kind of changes, not against them. Especially since stuff like these changes benefit me just as much. Any new character I make levels faster, can buy jetpacks, has new content to run, has better balanced powers to play with, gets way less debt, gets exp exemplared down and all the rest of it.

But I don't play this game for achievements. I play it for fun, and the achievements are a nice bonus. I also believe that if someone is willing to buy 2 years worth of sub time, they should get 2 years worth of vet rewards. I'm led to believe that's not a popular opinion though


Support Guides for all Corruptor secondaries and Fortunatas
The Melee Teaming Guide for Melee Mans

 

Posted

Quote:
I see this as a good thing.
As do I. I have two accounts. One has Epics unlocked. The other has only lowbies and mid-levels. Now I can create Epics both accounts. Or am I, per the OP, supposed to be upset that my second account hasn't earned it?


 

Posted

Interesting. Surprsing that the OP didn't come back to the thread.

(yes, that was sarcasm).

If he did he would see how WRONG he is.

Lowering it to lvl 20 was genius. GG devs.


Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!

 

Posted

I'm of the opinion it would be just super if Kheldians got some minimal status protection from their level 1 innate armor, like the Soldiers get.

VEAT makes a team much better.
A team just makes a Kheldian kinda better. Oh, and they bring awesome Cysts as a present (although it's gotten quite rare these days).

Kheldians were never an epic archetype. In the old days of Kryptonite Quantums they were just laughably bad. I remember voids seemed to even ignore taunts to flip around an 1-shot a kheldian teammate. They were a hybrid AT in a game of pure ATs, with special custom enemies that have been steadily nerfed down over the years. I mean, it was kind of cool to be a pocket blaster or a pocket tanker but they didn't excel at any. But, with IO's these days a WS can be a floating squid tankmage. Peacebringers...lol, sorry Jack nerfed you so hard years ago. You just suck.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iannis View Post
Kheldians were never an epic archetype.
"Epic" in CoH refers to their storyline, which is "extending beyond the usual or ordinary especially in size or scope" compared to the regular storylines in-game (since their narrative goes from level 1 to 50 instead of being just a bunch of smaller stories tied together). At least for Kheldians. For Arachnos they seem to be using the more common interpretation in games of 'epic' referring only to power levels...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ultrawatt View Post
I know this is just a rant but WTF? Why did they make this change?
Seems to me very few people play them and, I suspect, even after lowering the requirements the attraction will be limited. It's not just a question of relative effectiveness or even just prestige/ego as much as it is the limited abilities to customize VEATs and the, to my eye anyway, rather silly shapeshift forms and backstory behind Kheldians.

Using regular classes a player can dream up just about any concept and then build it. Here the concept is in your face and it's just a matter of tinkering around the edges. The only reason to bother is if you're that into status and prestige ("Look at my shiny gold star!") or find some aspect of either highly useful in technical gameplay terms despite the limitations and downsides ("I may look like a squidbilly but I kick buttocks!").

But for most people attracted, at this point, to CoH the draw still seems to be customization. Experimenting with different power combinations, costume and power designs, IO set mechanics and so on. That's the particular draw of CoX. You can jump in and inside a week have enough meat on the bones of a new character to mess around some. And there are so many different ways to put those characters together.

Static options, like EATs, naturally run contrary to the freewheeling, experimental, nature of the ur-CoH player. Whether that player is a powergamer, PvPers, roleplayer or whatever the one thing in common is the love of putting something new together. Being original. Discovery.

Or am I just out of my freakin' gourd as usual?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruppa View Post
Using regular classes a player can dream up just about any concept and then build it. Here the concept is in your face and it's just a matter of tinkering around the edges. The only reason to bother is if you're that into status and prestige ("Look at my shiny gold star!") or find some aspect of either highly useful in technical gameplay terms despite the limitations and downsides ("I may look like a squidbilly but I kick buttocks!").
I think you're mostly on point, but I'd like to add a third reason to want to play an EAT: you actually want to be the specific thing that the EAT represents, which no more generic AT can represent quite as well. I'm very happy with my Fortunata and Crab Spider, who are precisely a Fortunata and a Crab Spider and not as near an approximation as I could kludge. There are also some other concepts best represented by the specific mix of powers available to EATs, although they tend to be a bit wacky - my "warshade" is a channeler of the spirits of deep-sea creatures, so it's perfectly natural that she turns into a ghostly squid or crustacean, and I've occasionally considered creating a Crab Spider who is actually a giant evil ambulatory hand.

But, like the other reasons, this one has a limited draw.


@SPTrashcan
Avatar by Toxic_Shia
Why MA ratings should be changed from stars to "like" or "dislike"
A better algorithm for ordering MA arcs