Brute SA VS Tanker SA - Not 100% fair?
By
CapnGeist,
Posted on: 2010-02-27 11:41 in Suggestions and Ideas
The balance is the primary/secondary thing. Yes, Brutes get less bang for their buck with their defense sets, but they get more with their melee sets. If we were to change this, we'd need to also lower the secondary effects of all of a Brute's defense powers and all of a tanker's attacks.
NPCs: A Single Method to Greatly Expand Bases
Brutes are also less affected by the damage debuff in Granite because of Fury. The percentual decrease in overall damage is laughably small compared to what Tankers experience.
Well, I was just looking at Stone Armor and I just realized after making I don't know how many Stone Armor toons that the recharge/damage penalty is the same on both the tanker and the brute? This does not seem fair in my opinion since the resist for the brute are lower, so why should they suffer the same penalty? I think it should be slightly adjusted to compensate for the lower resist? I know on the tanker it is a primary and on brute it is secondary, but it still seems like lower resist should be lower penalty imo. Anyone else agree or disagree?
"I have always been a fan of science fiction. It all started when my parents forced me to go to church when I was a child."