[ QUOTE ]
Frankly, that this thread hasn't been locked in a positive sign regarding the maturity of both Virtue's posters and our moderators. And our moderator's opinion of our maturity.
Either that or they avoid Virtue altogether due to the only slightly veiled lewdness of the Rookery threads and such.
[/ QUOTE ]
I've read all the post, and there wasn't anything bad in it.
PG 13 doesn't mean "never mentionning sex, dating and sexual preference ever". I've had my first "sex education" class when i was about 7-8.
The difference is that for 13 and the like, we only describe in detail when it's in a purely biological way to explain reproduction. Anything else, we must not go in details.
Just talking about butt wingling or that some people prefer to date people of the same sex.... nothing wrong with that.
Yes we need to protect the younger readers from extremely sexual or prornographic talk... but we must not over protect them to the point of them asking at 18 years old: "So... anyone can finaly explain to me if it's the bee and flower or if it's the stork that really make babies?"
It really shouldn't be surprising that it wasn't modded. O_O
"It's a scrapper. If he can't handle it, no one can." -BrandX
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Frankly, that this thread hasn't been locked in a positive sign regarding the maturity of both Virtue's posters and our moderators. And our moderator's opinion of our maturity.
Either that or they avoid Virtue altogether due to the only slightly veiled lewdness of the Rookery threads and such.
[/ QUOTE ]
I've read all the post, and there wasn't anything bad in it.
PG 13 doesn't mean "never mentionning sex, dating and sexual preference ever". I've had my first "sex education" class when i was about 7-8.
The difference is that for 13 and the like, we only describe in detail when it's in a purely biological way to explain reproduction. Anything else, we must not go in details.
Just talking about butt wingling or that some people prefer to date people of the same sex.... nothing wrong with that.
Yes we need to protect the younger readers from extremely sexual or prornographic talk... but we must not over protect them to the point of them asking at 18 years old: "So... anyone can finaly explain to me if it's the bee and flower or if it's the stork that really make babies?"
It really shouldn't be surprising that it wasn't modded. O_O
[/ QUOTE ]
Uh, the entire damn thing is borderline flame-bait. Let me line them up:
Homosexuality
Public Displays of Affection
Mores of MMOs: To Kick or Not To Kick
More Mores of MMOs: Does a warning justify any action
Mores of Forums: Seeking support for an already resolved situation: is it drumming up contention where none exists, or a legitimate thing to do?
Probably some other things too.
[ QUOTE ]
Uh, the entire damn thing is borderline flame-bait. Let me line them up:
Homosexuality
Public Displays of Affection
Mores of MMOs: To Kick or Not To Kick
More Mores of MMOs: Does a warning justify any action
Mores of Forums: Seeking support for an already resolved situation: is it drumming up contention where none exists, or a legitimate thing to do?
[/ QUOTE ]
While it might cause flame-war... as long as there isn't any, it's perfectly good to talk about all that.
Maybe i've spent too much time on virtue, but i didn't notice a flame-war. =P
"It's a scrapper. If he can't handle it, no one can." -BrandX
Frankly, that this thread hasn't been locked in a positive sign regarding the maturity of both Virtue's posters and our moderators. And our moderator's opinion of our maturity.
Either that or they avoid Virtue altogether due to the only slightly veiled lewdness of the Rookery threads and such.