macskull

Yes, most of the people in Vince's SG on Justice are terrible. Vince is ok at least but lying about his Freedom dueling record is unimpressive.

If I were making a dueling build I think I'd probably go with Sonic or Arch, but team build I'd go Psi. I've seen your Arch Blaster in RV and that thing kinda hurts.

Shout only sucks if you open with it. It's when you've stacked Shriek and Scream that it really hurts.

Only reason I've had to get mad at him was the time he ran around in PFF the entire match (that was in I13 though).

So whatever happened here? >.>

Hmm, I don't actually know that one. I have barely played control ATs since I13 thanks to the mez changes, so I can honestly say I've never seen Containment even factor in.

[ QUOTE ]
Mac, please elaborate. Be nice.

[/ QUOTE ]
Fine fine.

[ QUOTE ]
Ice is pretty decent due to the -rech effects, Fire remains very nice especially with Aim/BU capable routines.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ice is good for the -rech and the in-set hold. That's about it. Its fast-activating attacks mean it deals less damage than other sets in PvP. Fire's still capable but qualifying that by saying "it's nice with Aim/BU" doesn't work, because almost every Blaster combination has access to Aim/BU.

[ QUOTE ]
For survivability you're going to have to settle for Devices as a secondary for the benefits of the cloaking device. If you load up on the power pools which will give you extra defense and moderate resistance you can fair better.

[/ QUOTE ]
You don't rely on your secondary for pure survivability (that comes in the form of team buffs, inspirations, Phase, and APP powers), you rely on it for utility and damage. There's not much point in taking a pool like Fighting on a Blaster (40% base resist + 30ish% resist from an APP shield still gets DR'd to about 40% in zones and further buffs will not provide a large benefit). There's also no way you can stack enough defense through pool powers or IO sets to be meaningful without sacrificing something more important in your build like +HP or +damage.

[ QUOTE ]
Currently the big oppents are still total invisible Stalkers stealth/hide/IO-stealth and Brutes with massive strikes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Stalkers are, as they have always been, the least of the problems a good player will face (barring the really good Stalkers, but most of those don't play anymore). Keep moving and it will be difficult or impossible for most Stalkers to AS you. Kite and Brutes will be easy unless you allow them to close to melee.

[ QUOTE ]
With Firocity, my Fire/Dev Blaster using Hover/Cloack/CJ/Maneuvers I have a longer survivability rate. I've included Air Superiority which in conjunction with Webnade from Dev allows me to take out any flying villian if both hit even if they have taken a flight pack addition.

[/ QUOTE ]
As a flier, you are generally safer, until you get hit with a -fly power - there are many of these floating around. Then you're kind of screwed unless you have a backup travel power (think Super Speed).

[ QUOTE ]
Ice would be a nice Primary over Fire since it does have the -Rech/Slow components as well as Dmg. Fire does DoT which can tick off a final component, but it's better to go for the upfront damage along with the side effects IMHO. The biggest drawback in Ice is the more powerful attacks are a good bit slower making interruption more possible.

[/ QUOTE ]
1. -Rech slows are somewhat worthwhile but get DR'd, movement slows are largely worthless thanks to the removal of -maxrunspeed in I13.

2. Fire has better "up front" damage than Ice, even before factoring in the DoTs.

3. The only "slow-animating" attack in Ice is Bitter Freeze Ray, which most PvP builds will skip. Every other attack in Ice is fairly fast-activating (which, again, leads to its lower damage).

[ QUOTE ]
When stalkers AS there is 2 portions of damage (or 3 if it is something that does en/smash or neg en/smash, like with EM's and DM's AS becuase it splits the first portion of damage between the to... actually alot of the sets do that but anyway...) The first portion of damage is done no matter what and gets resisted. the second portion is unresisted and you must have hidden status for.

[/ QUOTE ]
If I'm not mistaken, though, the critical (hidden) portion of AS was resisted during I13 but was made unresisted again in I14. I'm not saying it's a bad thing but it's inconsistent with everything else (there's no unresisted damage elsewhere, not even from Blasters).

[ QUOTE ]
Good post, Mac.

As I said during beta, new PvP is like living in Harrison Bergeron's world.

It's too bad. Everyone shouldn't be the same.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ironic how he ends up dying at the end of that story. It's an eerie parallel.

I haven't had a chance to test it more extensively, I've only tried on my Brute. I may have to take some of my squishier toons (or lower-level toons) through to see if the behavior persists.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I've got a situation i've been making a bunch of blasters for I13 pvp and EVERY time they get owned (they are built for SC) so I wind up junking them and making another and now i'm out of ideas so i'm turning to the forums for help so anyone got any ideas??

[/ QUOTE ]

Ice is pretty decent due to the -rech effects, Fire remains very nice especially with Aim/BU capable routines.

For survivability you're going to have to settle for Devices as a secondary for the benefits of the cloaking device. If you load up on the power pools which will give you extra defense and moderate resistance you can fair better.

Currently the big oppents are still total invisible Stalkers stealth/hide/IO-stealth and Brutes with massive strikes.

With Firocity, my Fire/Dev Blaster using Hover/Cloack/CJ/Maneuvers I have a longer survivability rate. I've included Air Superiority which in conjunction with Webnade from Dev allows me to take out any flying villian if both hit even if they have taken a flight pack addition.

Ice would be a nice Primary over Fire since it does have the -Rech/Slow components as well as Dmg. Fire does DoT which can tick off a final component, but it's better to go for the upfront damage along with the side effects IMHO. The biggest drawback in Ice is the more powerful attacks are a good bit slower making interruption more possible.

I have an Ice/Fire Blaster who is fun to play even at 50 having the debuffs plus the DoT of Fire, but like all Blasters even he is susceptible to the high damage attacks of Stalkers and Brutes.

If you are a Balls to the Wall player, then you need to not go with Devices because you lose the Aim/BU combo which can devastate certain opponents. Devices is more for the ranged hunter since it spreads the To Hit as a constant rather than peaking the attack in one instant.

[/ QUOTE ]
...

*shakes head*

So much of this is wrong it's not even funny.

[ QUOTE ]
Though I've sent this in as a petition, this needs to be stated here as well (lol, at least according to NCSoft responses).

Several times since I14 introduction I have been perma or near-perma held by Tsoo bosses, specifically those with Gravity type powers in Sirens Call. This is inconsistent with actual player ability in the zone, and has resulted in my character's demise more than 75% of the time at the hands of NPCs. I don't count death by PvP hand, since that's to be expected of the opportunits that bound around in the zone.

Since no contr/dom/def/corr have the ability to perma or near-perma hold opponents, this is a techinical issue that needs to be dealt with!

[/ QUOTE ]
We've asked for it dozens of times (Slax's response was Castle's reply directly to my request during I14 closed beta). Nothing has come of it.

Good luck though! Isn't the new system great!?

[ QUOTE ]
When one hacks the Gibson, one tends to admire their handiwork.

[/ QUOTE ]
My wordplay has failed you.

Yes, hence the tl;dr disclaimer at the top.

--- Before I begin: the TL;DR version is in bold italics. ---

Well, here we go. I’m going to post this with the full knowledge that it will probably never land on someone’s desk, or that no redname other than a moderator will set eyes on it. But I’m going to post it anyways. Why? Because I care. I like this game and its players – I may not like the decisions of the developers within the last six months or so, but the people I play the game with are important, moreso than the game itself. I sent off this post as an email to NCSoft as well – I think it’s time I made my voice heard.

We have been told several times now that the developers consider post-I13 PvP (“new PvP”) to be less flawed and more fun than the old system. Problem is, we haven’t been told why. Do the developers themselves consider it to be more fun? Is this input relayed from players or surveys? Here’s where the first problem arises. This problem is simple: when you decided to forge ahead with these PvP changes, you knew at the very beginning that you were not designing this new system with the current crop of PvPers in mind. From the very beginning of this idea, it was a poorly-formulated one – what kind of business plans a major overhaul to a small segment of its consumer base while completely disregarding that very segment? You were warned by your colleagues and your early playtesters that the changes would likely not go over well – but you followed through anyways. When Issue 13 went into open beta and everyone got to see for themselves what the changes were, it was a mess, and rightly so. What’s worse, up until Lighthouse’s now famous post about the “PvP segment,” you continually told the existing PvP population that you were working with them on implementing their suggestions into patches both during open beta and after issue launch. Very little, if any, of those suggestions were actually implemented even remotely similarly to how they were suggested.

The PvP changes in I13 nearly caused the death of high-end organized PvP. For an overhaul that was supposed to increase the popularity (and population) of PvP, that should have been a first sign that something was very wrong. Almost every test ladder team disbanded and hundreds of subscriptions were cancelled in the month or so after open beta began. PvPers were upset, and rightly so – they had spent years without any official support forming ladders, making rules, setting up matches, and making detailed and comprehensive lists of suggestions to better the system. When I13 was released those PvPers were dismayed to find almost nothing they had asked for, and almost everything they hadn’t. Some of the best players in the game just gave up everything they’d spent years on and left. The ladder is just beginning to get back off the ground again – but for what? Will you go through a few months from now and make more seemingly willy-nilly and unasked-for changes, and then keep telling the players you’re listening to their feedback while you’re actually doing just the opposite? For the future of this game’s PvP and this game in general, I hope not.

Anyways, I’d like to begin by taking a look at the post that sparked this all. At the onset, we have:
[ QUOTE ]
We began by looking at the disparities that existed, and discussed how to address them. Ultimately, we decided that in order to allow better competition between the AT's and powersets, we needed to take some drastic measures. We decided that a different rule set needed to apply in PvP than in PvE. By changing the basic rules, we hope to encourage a greater variety of character builds in Arena PvP, and ultimately in Base Raids and Zone PVP.

At the core, many of the power effects are the same: Heals still heal, attacks still deal damage, and holds still hold. However, the new system makes a number of adjustments that should be friendlier to a wider range of AT's and skill levels. The goal is for players to be able to bring any AT and powerset combination into PVP and to be competitive and have fun! Furthermore, with the Issue 13’s Multiple builds feature, players can design a PvP specific build and not have it affect their normal character.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think the people that were best-qualified to say what tweaks and changes PvP needed were those that spent almost all their in-game time PvPing. Yet those lists were largely ignored, and some heavy-handed rules were implemented with very little player feedback taken into consideration. First, you assumed that there needed to be competition between ATs and powersets. Does this same “competition” need to be there in PvE? Is it unfair and unbalanced that Tankers have more defense or resistance than Defenders? Is it unfair and unbalanced that Blasters outdamage Controllers? Each AT has its own specific role in PvE, and the same should apply in PvP. You hoped these changes would promote greater variety in arena PvP – instead, the opposite has happened. Just prior to I13, the hero and villain test PvP ladders were blooming – people had roles for many powersets (not all, mind you, but that’s due more to the design of those powersets – for example, when you want to solo large groups of enemies really really fast, do you bring along a single-target character? No – but does that mean you need to completely readjust those enemies? Also no). People were using Storms, Rads, TAs, Poisons, Kins, Sonics, Therms – you name it, it was probably used at some point. Now, thanks to the options put in place and the kludgy way the system works, there’s one lineup that has become the “gotta find a counter to this!” team. When a particular powerset or even AT is being used in a match because of only one power, there might be something wrong.

You are correct in that the basic core systems are mostly the same – heals still heal (for a while, but then when they’re needed the most, they can’t be relied on), attacks still deal damage (kind of… and some of those attacks are just crazy), and holds still hold (for a few seconds). It’s what you did to those systems that is causing so much hostility and animosity. You also mention that the changes make PvP more available to different ATs and skill levels. Problem is, you accomplished that goal by essentially eliminating what makes each AT unique, and by leveling the “skill field” to where no skill aside from button mashing is really required.

Now, on to the meat of Castle’s post. Let’s start with diminishing returns (DR).
[ QUOTE ]
Nearly all attributes characters have are now subject to Diminishing Returns. The specific numbers vary from attribute to attribute, and from class to class (it's easier to Buff Resistance and Defense on a Tanker, than on a Blaster.)
* In general, a single buff will have near full effect, while additional buffs begin to offer less and less benefit. Example: Under the old system, Aim + Build up might provide a combined 67% To Hit buff, while under this system it provides a combined 49% To Hit Buff.
* The calculation is based on the sum of all buffs, so the order the buffs are applied in does not matter.
* It is important to note that the Real Numbers tool will not always report the results of diminishing returns accurately, at least initially. This is specifically true of Damage Buffs, which always display the Pre-Diminished value.

[/ QUOTE ]
First – why was this particular change needed? Some of the given reasoning was that it would help close the gap between SO’d builds and high-end purpled builds. However, given the implementation of PvP IOs in Issue 14, this seems to be a bit of a double-standard. What is the point of giving PvPers the ability to have PvP-only set bonuses if those bonuses don’t even grant their full effectiveness in a PvP environment? I can somewhat understand diminishing returns applying to outside buffs, and that makes sense to me – to a point. What I can’t understand, however, is why you would make diminishing returns apply to someone’s own set bonuses. That’s like saying “Sorry, we don’t care that you spent a billion inf on your build to make it the best it can be. People complained so now we’re going to bring you down to their level.”

This change seems based on the misconception that you needed IOs to PvP – several of my characters PvP’d on SOs before I13, and with DR in place I have no real drive to IO my characters except maybe for +HP set bonuses (since HP doesn’t diminish). Giving PvPers access to purples, PvP recipes, and other high-end IO sets, and then reducing the benefits those items give, isn’t a good way to encourage participation or usage of those IO sets. You say there’s no way to differentiate between IO bonuses and other buffs – I say there should be. If you are going to “make a full-time commitment to PvP from now on” as you said you were at the I13 launch, you need to start listening to the players who still PvP, before you lose even more of them. This change also seems to be based on the assumption that having a few people buff one character to near-tankmage status is a terrible thing that should not happen – but I propose that this happens in PvE as well. Should you also implement diminishing returns to buffs in PvE content? For the sake of consistency, I think you should. That will go over very well with the playerbase, I assure you.

The DR caps for some aspects are terribly strict – for example, my Mastermind can’t seem to push above 20% defense without extreme effort (even Power Boosted Vengeance – normally 40% how I have it slotted - adds a measly 4% on top of the 15% he’s got in PvP, which is half of what he has in PvE). My 50% defense on my SR gets reduced to maybe 30-35% in zones, and his 95% defense debuff resistance is closer to 70%, after factoring in the free debuff resistance that all melee ATs get in PvP now. More importantly, even the “free” stuff added to your stats in PvP zones (base resistances, debuff resistance, etc) is subject to diminishing returns – so you’re adding to that character, but they can’t even take full advantage of those buffs? That doesn’t make sense to me. The fact that sturdier ATs like Tankers benefit more from external buffs than do their more fragile counterparts like Blasters confounds me – Tankers are already ahead of the game in the survivability department simply because of their higher base HP and stronger defense/resistance values. But now you tell me that they should benefit more from external buffs than do the lower-HP ATs with weaker defenses? Maybe I’m missing something here. I propose the DR curves be cut in half, and at the same time cut in half the amount of base resistances squishies get in PvP (40% is a bit ridiculous – but go figure, even with that and my patron shield, I’m only at 39% after DR, and Sonic or Therm buffs add almost nothing). This provides a real reason for PvPers to invest their time in obtaining IO sets, because they will be more useful again – not saying they aren’t now, just that they’ve lost much of their appeal since I13. Additionally, the real numbers display needs to accurately reflect DR’d values of [u]all[u] attributes. I know when I go into a PvP zone on my Warshade that I don’t actually have perma-Hasten (the equivalent, in his case, of about 185% global recharge) – but the real numbers readout says I do.

And last, the most egregious issue in my opinion: diminishing returns nullifies the roles of some buffers. Want to bring a Sonic to a match? Sure, but all they’ll be good for is caging and the –res, since Clarity barely makes a difference and is only really good for the +perception now, the shields add only a few percentage points of resistance to the ATs that could most use them, and the large bubble no longer grants mez protection and offers very little resistance benefit. Want to bring an Emp? Sure, but CM is only useful for the +perception, Fortitude might be worthwhile for a bit of +def (but that gets DR’d) on a resist-based character, or a bit of +tohit (again, DR’d), but mostly for the +damage, since that seems to be what everything is balanced around now. Same thing for a Therm – shields aren’t worth much for the ATs that need them most, Forge is mostly useful for the +damage, Thaw is worthwhile for the slow resistance, but that gets DR’d too. Kins are useful for the –KB in Increase Density (but that gets DR’d), and not so much for Speed Boost or Inertial Reduction, because everything gets suppressed (unless you turn suppression off, in which case they’re not needed either). Need I go on?

Next, let’s talk about travel suppression.
[ QUOTE ]
* PvE Travel Suppression continues to work as it has since it was introduced. PvP Travel Suppression will be handled differently, however (see below.)
* All Teleportation and Summonable Teleportals are Disabled while PvP Travel Suppression is active.
The Duration of Movement Suppression in PvP is now variable based on the most recent suppression event applicable to the character. In case of multiple events applicable on the same server tick, only the longest value is applied.
Suppression events are:
Activating a foe TargetedRange (range > 7') damaging Power: 3s * Sum of damage scales.
Example1: Power Bolt has a damage Scale of 1.0 (0.1 + 0.9) resulting in a Suppression Duration of 3 seconds.
o Example2: Power Burst has a damage scale of 2.12 resulting in a Suppression Duration of 6.39 seconds.
* Activating a foe Targeted Melee (Range >0' && Range => 7') damaging Power: 2s* Sum of damage scales.
o Example1: Swipe has a damage scale of 0.76 resulting in a suppression time of 1.52 seconds.
o Example2: Eviscerate has a damage scale of 1.99 resulting in a suppression time of 3.98 seconds.
* Activating a foe targeted Range debuff or control power: 3.5s
* Activating a foe targeted Melee debuff or control power: 2.5s
* Placing a Location Based Entity: 4s
* Activating a self or friend targeted Heal power: 4s
* Activating a Friend targeted Buff power: 4s
* Being the target of an attack: 2s

[/ QUOTE ]
This, more than anything else, is what drove away many of the hardcore PvPers. This game had one of the most unique (not necessarily the best, mind you) PvP engines in the industry simply because of the pace of combat. Travel suppression killed that, and it killed the open feeling that PvP zones gave – you had a huge battleground that you could engage opponents on, dodging around buildings, into tunnels, through forests, anything like that. Now, due to travel suppression, a fight is confined to a smaller area unless someone has phase. Previously, if you were facing difficult odds, you had the option to retreat to regroup with your teammates, or try to tactically outsmart the opponents. Those aspects are now gone – all your pursuers have to do is keep pegging you with attacks, ensuring you’re permanently suppressed, until they can all gather up on you to kill you quickly. At that point you’d better hope Phase or Hibernate is up, or you’re dead. Let’s say I’m on my Therm, and things start to get a bit dicey. My HP is dropping fast, and Hibernate isn’t up yet. I am left with three choices: click Warmth, get suppressed, and get swarmed; try to run, get hit, get suppressed, and get swarmed; or just stand there and die. Not only am I committing virtual suicide by even attempting to heal myself, my heals are also getting less and less effective at keeping me alive at the very moment I need them the most.

I realize the list I quoted above is no longer entirely correct (for example, buffs don’t suppress anymore – at least not some: Forge causes suppression, Fortitude doesn’t, for example). But, let’s ask this question: Why was suppression, in this form, considered necessary? I can think of two reasons. First, to give melee ATs a better chance at getting kills against ranged ATs, and second, to ensure that once a fight starts, someone dies. You failed spectacularly at the first point – kind of. You succeeded in that most of the people in PvP zones these days are Tankers, Scrappers, Stalkers, and Brutes, but failed in that the current “favorite” powersets for those ATs are once that bring ranged attacks to the table – Spines and Super Strength, notably. Even on characters with no in-set ranged attacks, they are practically required to take ranged attacks from an epic or patron pool just to be competitive. The problem with this is that the duration of suppression from being attacked is too short compared to the duration of suppression for making an attack, even a melee one. Two seconds of suppression on your opponent doesn’t help close the distance if you are suppressed for three seconds. I propose that the I13 suppression system be thrown out the window and replaced with one similar to what TribHavok suggested during the I13 beta (by the way, PvPers were told you were going to implement that system, and it never happened). That is:

* Suppression functions identically to PvE suppression, except:
* Being hit by a melee attack from a melee AT (not a ranged attack, such as Spirit Shark, Hurl, or Impale, from those ATs) causes two seconds of suppression. This, combined with the autohit -75% range in Taunt/Confront, will help ensure both that ranged ATs will need to stay fairly close to the melee ATs, while allowing the melee AT to close distance with the ranged attacker more easily.

Next, let’s take a look at the control powers changes.
[ QUOTE ]
Control power changes are fairly extensive. The goal here was to make control effects less binary in nature. The shorter durations of status effects, combined with the change from status Protection to Status resistance means that these powers will now how impact on a PvP situation more frequently, but are no longer quite as severe a deciding factor.
* For Controllers: Change Duration base to 4 seconds for Stun, Sleep, Hold, Immobilize, Terrorize, Confuse, Untouchable, Intangible attributes. Duration of Status Effects (Hold, Sleep, etc.) no longer scale by level; instead they have fixed base durations.
* For Dominators: Change normal control Duration base to 4 seconds for Stun, Sleep, Hold, Immobilize, Terrorize, Confuse, Untouchable, Intangible attributes. Duration of Status Effects (Hold, Sleep, etc.) no longer scale by level; instead they have fixed base durations. Change Domination control Duration base to 4 seconds for Stun, Sleep, Hold, Immobilize, Terrorize, Confuse, Untouchable, Intangible attribs. Duration of Status Effects (Hold, Sleep, etc.) no longer scale by level; instead they have fixed base durations. Change Magnitude bonus from +3 to +1.
* For ALL OTHERS: Change control Duration base to 2 seconds for Stun, Sleep, Hold, Immobilize, Terrorize, Confuse, Untouchable, Intangible attributes. Duration of Status Effects (Hold, Sleep, etc.) no longer scale by level; instead they have fixed base durations.
* For Tankers: Change Taunt to a fixed 6 second duration.
* For Scrappers and Brutes: Change Taunt to a fixed 4 second duration.
* For the Manipulation Pool: Change Taunt to a fixed 4 second duration.
* For Stalkers: Change Placate to a fixed 10 second duration.
* For VEATs: Change Placate to a fixed 4 second duration.

[/ QUOTE ]
I applaud the efforts to make mez effects less binary in nature, but I don’t think converting protection into resistance was the way to go. The only positive I can see from this entire change is that I don’t have to bring a tray full of Break Frees into zones on a squishy anymore. NPCs in zones are particularly dangerous because their mezzes follow the pre-I13 rules – in other words, if you’re mezzed by an NPC while there are enemy players around, you will die. I cannot think of a way to change this system that does not involve reverting back to the I12 system, but if anyone has suggestions, please do so. In the meantime, I have two gripes with the specifics of this system: first, NPCs are ridiculously overpowered right now should you be unfortunate enough to get too close to one; second, the mez procs (chance for stun, immobilize, hold) in some IO sets have not been standardized to the I13 rules and some last for up to 8 seconds – twice as long as a Dominator or Controller’s base hold. These should be changed to a fixed duration of two seconds in the interests of consistency with non-control-AT mez powers.

The other problem I see coming from this is essentially the “normalization” of all ATs. By drastically reducing the control ability of Dominators and Controllers, and by increasing the damage on their mezzes, you’ve basically turned them into Blasters with less HP, removing one of the unique aspects of those ATs. The change of focus from dynamic team roles to “damage damage damage” destroys team balance and makes PvP more like a free-for-all slugfest. Support can’t support, control can’t control, healers can’t heal – about the only thing anyone is good for is a bit of debuffing and damage.

Next, heal decay.
[ QUOTE ]
* A Heal Event now imposes a 25% Resistance to further heals on the character, regardless of source. This Resistance to heals will last for 15 seconds, and stacks with itself. This means that if you are healed 4 times, no further healing will affect you until the resistance duration ends.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is probably secondary to travel suppression in killing the pre-I13 ladder teams. I know the system was tweaked since this post (there’s no longer 0% effectiveness) but heal decay does not belong in PvP in an MMO. Why was it added? This system ensures that the only heals that are really reliable when healing is most needed are Power Boosted Absorb Pain or Share Pain. This system also ensures that spiking is now a skill-less damage spam until the target can no longer be healed, after which time the target must either phase or die. As a healer on a PvP team, it’s my job to keep people’s HP bars in the green. I can’t do that if my 400 HP heal is only healing them for 75 HP (yes, I’m using real numbers here). It’s at that point that I have to say “Sorry, I tried.” Quite frankly, that sucks. My buffs to enhance their survivability aren’t fully effective, so they take more damage than they should, and then I can’t heal that damage away? That makes no sense to me. I would happily accept heal decay on self-heal powers (such as Healing Aura or Radiant Aura) if ally heal powers did not cause decay because that makes me feel worthless at a time when my teammates need me the most, and that’s not fun. If you refuse that prospect, lessen the severity of heal decay in general – heals are there to keep people alive when other methods have failed, and reducing their effectiveness is reducing the survivability of other players. Why not add heal decay to PvE as well? I mean, if PvP heal decay is any indication, being kept alive is not working as intended.

On to damage powers and damage calculation.
[ QUOTE ]
* Powers now calculate damage based on their activation time, instead of their recharge.
* Lower activation time powers get a slight bonus to damage, due to chaining low damage powers being difficult in PvP.
* Longer Recharge time powers also get a slight damage bonus, so higher level powers with long recharge times deal extra damage.
* Damage has been adjusted for all AT's, reducing the damage gap between each AT.

[/ QUOTE ]
Let me start off by saying I agree with the idea of DPA balancing, but I don’t agree with how it was implemented. DPA balancing should have been implemented at the launch of the game, for the entire game, not just one part of the game nearly five years after launch. The reason adding this system to PvP now is a problem is simple: things just don’t make sense. Let’s take Flares and Blaze as our first examples. Flares recharges faster, uses less endurance, has a much longer range, and can be used while mezzed, and does almost as much damage as Blaze, the supposed “hard hitter” of the Fire Blast set. Next, this means that some pool power attacks (I’m looking at you, Flurry and Kick) which every AT has access to hit harder than some in-set attacks. How is this balanced? There are certain roles for certain ATs, melee damage should not be a generalist role. But, I forgot – there are no roles now, thanks to all this normalization.

Additionally, some (but not all) AoEs got hit upside the head with a baseball bat during this damage rebalancing, which is amusing because AoE attack powers play very little role in PvP (Fire Blasters used Fireball because it did damage comparable to Fire Blast, making it another useful attack). Now, you might as well use Brawl instead of Fireball. Heck, even tier 9 nukes got neutered. It’s not a sign of good knowledge of the system if the damage on rarely-used powers is lowered to the point where they’re not even worth using, period. At least dual builds will let us take Flurry and skip Blaze on our PvP build, and skip Flurry and take Blaze on our PvE build. One of your stated goals of the I13 changes was to encourage diversity, but these examples directly counter that. Everyone taking Flurry and Kick and ignoring their set powers isn’t diversity, it’s stupidity - yet that’s exactly what’s happened.

Last but not least, base resistances.
[ QUOTE ]
* Each AT now recieves a bonus resist buff while in PVP, in order to set each AT closer in overall survivability. This resist primarily reduces up the gap in hitpoints between lower hitpoint AT's and higher hitpoint AT's
* Epic armors and Tough (Pool Power) now provide resistance to all damage types while in PVP.
* Any armor set lacking a type of resist or defense will now provide it while in PvP zones.

[/ QUOTE ]
Again with the normalization stuff. Why didn’t you just change it so every AT had equal hitpoints in PvP, since you yourself said that’s what you were aiming for? Let’s say you implemented these base resistances in PvE as well as PvE – suddenly you have Blasters with capped resistances running around, unkillable Defenders soloing mobs of bosses, and Controllers breezing their way through wave after wave of mobs with zero risk. Doesn’t that sound broken or unbalanced to you? A Blaster has low hit points and low defenses because of their incredible ranged damage output – if they want survivability, they play it smart while solo or they find teammates who can give them that survivability. These base resistances are unnecessary and unbalanced assuming competent support-oriented teammates. Point is, not everyone needs to get lots and lots of kills to be PvPing – some like playing support, but these changes gutted that ability. Lower the bonus resists for squishies to 20-25%. Give an arena option to turn off the bonus resistances completely. With DR off, squishies are running around with capped resists, non-decaying self-heals, and non-decaying ally heals. The alternative, of course, is to play with DR on, which results in a skill-less damage spam until heals cease to be effective, and neither option is particularly attractive.

I do, however, agree with the “everything grants resists to everything” idea because it means you can focus more on the “flavor” powers in an APP/PPP pool without having to worry whether or not the armor in that pool will be adequate. However, this comes at the expense of some sets losing their unique properties – WP and Stone had some protection from Psi damage, for example, which made those sets unique in that regard. Ice Armor had slow protection. So did SR. Now every melee status toggle/click power has those debuff resistances and every set has protection in some form against Psi damage.

In closing: perhaps the biggest problem of all with the I13 changes it that while they were designed to bring new players into the fold, there was nothing done to inform the players of the new PvP rulesets in the game. Sure, there were the forums and word of mouth. If you are committed to PvP, and want to see it succeed, then YOU need to take the steps to ensure that it does – document these changes in the game so new players aren’t wondering why things work differently. Give organized PvP developer support. And most importantly, listen to player feedback – don’t be stubborn and say “Sorry, this isn’t negotiable.” Be willing to compromise and REALLY take player feedback into account. After all, you could have access to all the data in the world, but if you interpret it wrong, it doesn’t do anyone any good. The ones who know the system the best aren’t the ones that have all the data, but those who spend their time actually using the system.

Then why are you sticking around?

The "original" version of that map doesn't have a minimap for thematic or story purposes, I suppose. They never added one for the MA version

Unless I'm doing something wrong with my mission, they made a change to the way Force Field (and maybe Sonic Resonance) allies act. I have an FF ally in an arc I'm testing which is supposed to follow you around with the big bubble on to provide some semblance of mez protection for squishies (since the enemies are mez-heavy). However, when I rescue the ally, they turn the bubble off. When I move away from them, it comes back on - but turns off again as soon as I get close.

Am I doing something wrong, or is this a new "feature?"

^^ Win.

See, I think DPA balancing is a good thing - I just think it should have been done at the very beginning instead of tacked on to only part of the game almost five years after launch.

Wonder why.

[ QUOTE ]
Ye but a good tanker will use taunt and effectively reduce the blasters range by 75%

[/ QUOTE ]
That doesn't stop the incoming damage, as the Blaster will still be kiting.

Yeah, it's great how a Blaster can have capped resists and put out more damage - from range, might I add - than a Tanker, and can keep that Tanker perma-suppressed until he gets the kill.

Heal decay is ballz.

<3 my 400-base-HP heal doing 75 instead, and at a time when the target needs it the most. Travel suppression and heal decay ensure that a skill-less damage spam is all that's required to get a kill.

@macskull or @Not Mac

[ QUOTE ]
Then why even make a second toon ... stick with that 1 lvl 50 and ride the wave ... why bother leveling another?

[/ QUOTE ]
Because my Earth/Storm plays way differently, and is useful for different things, than my Rad/Psy, which is different than my Emp, which is different than my MM... and so on and so forth.

If I only had one 50 to do what I do in the game, you're right. It would get damn boring.