Silit

SORRY I DON'T SPEAK FAT.

e.

I expected better grammar from you. Oh wait.

I thought BOBC/INA quit because they were too fat to fit in the league.

Is ok the Irish symbol for G? Wow. I love learning about other cultures. How insightful.

Not true. Spiner and Peril have procs but don't play their blasters, and no one else does either. Hoj, March, and Z each have one proc. I have 4. Let's not talk about procs though, because as Dex has said: That isn't the point.

Exactly. Dex is spot on with this. Psi/EMs don't do too much damage. At all. I find it funny how teams who say their blasters aren't experienced enough (and that they need to run brutes) try to talk about blasters doing too much damage, while every semi-competent offensive player says otherwise.

When fighting against competent support you can't even consistently drop a target with a 4 man offense based around psi/ems. Evading/Healing through psi/ems is ridiculously easy. This isn't even an argument.

All I see is people being like "I DIED AND I THINK I'M REALLY GOOD SO WHATEVER KILLED ME MUST BE OP".

Back to the actual point. Running brutes and playing for stalls/ties is a valid tactic, which is why the proposal is for d6 teams, and not d8 teams. Dex and I are suggesting that running four brutes in a d6 match isn't productive, since running four brutes doesn't help your d6 get any better at all.

It speaks volumes when a team's mentality is "Hey, d6, you are too bad to run jump lineups, so instead of helping you get better, we are going to play for ties in every match. We still have no hope of winning, but at least we don't take as many losses." What a joke.

I hate limiting ATs, I really do. Barrier is on point when he says it's relative to the fightclub mentality (See above comment about terrible players dying to psi/ems and then crying).

Regardless, until taunt gets some kind of suppression it is hideously broken. I support the notion to limit taunters to two in d6 matches.

And before anyone says anything: Yes. I single handedly scared an entire team out of the league. What are you going to do about it?

Agreed.

Actually, we did show on time, despite all of the crap you gave us. The match was set for 9:30, as decided one day earlier. dUmb was roughly 15 seconds late. So technically we could have made you forfeit. Psoma is on your team though so we didn't care.

Negotiations were ongoing until yesterday afternoon when your negotiators started actually thinking they were clever and tried to get my team DQed on rules that don't actually exist. Your negotiators then started ignoring every tell I sent them. I was still willing to negotiate, and still am.

I know your pain, we recently had trouble with a team trying to do something similar to us! I wish you where there to talk some sense into them when they refused to acknowledge that fact!

I feel you.

It's all relative. I think we can agree that both lineups are incredibly **** - unless you happen to bring stalkers - in which case they are slightly less ****.

Not at all - the last lineup doesn't have the ability to get any kills, so you can run around pew-pewing not having to worry about double AS.

They ran stalker based lineups with at least 4 taunters against us - save for the last game - they dropped a taunter for a dom to set up AS. Once we got stalkers out we were fine.

We were annoyed by what they ran against you guys because they kept saying that they would run the most homotastic lineups ever seen, and instead ended up running normal lineups or ones that can't kill anything. Sadface.

Oh.

Only a 9 on the homosexmeter. Against us they ran lineups which broke the scale, but were estimated to be well over 11.

We might as well.

We seldom run more than 3 psi/ems :O

Kins all day.