OmnipotentMerlin
-
Posts
179 -
Joined
-
oh by the way my photos weren't dirty unless you were attracted to them. It is a guy that has 2 personalities and one personality cross dresses. I don't have many photo of that clothes style. But I have plenty of photos that look attractive but are actualy guys. In a forum group I am with we have a contest of guess if the person in the picture is male or female. I am the reigning champion, for some odd reason lol.
-
Quote:you know the sad part about that. as soon as we create cute/pretty characters. We will be labled worse then being furry. stuff like "Pedo".Originally Posted by Silver Gale
Thirded!
The toon I am trying to get a cute lolita outfit for also has a japanse girl's blazer uniform. and no i didn't do it to turn people on i did it to try and match the real life uniforms not the perverted stuff in anime. Oh and I am not attracted to lolita outfits just some of them are cute or cool. nor am i attracted to furrys. I love animals and I love girls so why not mix the two, i don't do it to turn me on. anime females are enough for me anyways. -
Quote:look up the photo link name. look up who those characters are and then. feel dirty.Originally Posted by Quinch
They depict special occasions?
-
my turn my turn
have to admit i don't have much lolita pictures. If you figure out why I like these photos I will give you a cookie. Most of my photos are used for the same thing.
Quote:Oh but Tow. I can I can. Just depends on how you want to make fun of it. Wait a minute I just noticed I have zero furry lolita joke photos. that is so much crap. Oh wait nm everyone is addicted to neko lolitas. If I want ____ I will go get a wife, wink wink.Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow
You might have a hard time finding satire material that's work-safe, though
How about goth, then? -
this is funny we went from furrys to vampires. well the new animated demon tail will go well to with the vampires. teheheh. rack one up for merlin for taking a thread off topic.
-
Quote:that looks really good and close. kind of what i already have. it is the skirt that is most of the trouble. we just dont have any of those one skirts. crap i forgot what kind of term they are. do you get what i mean? the poofy skirt with the staked layers kind of. crap i cant think how to describe them.Originally Posted by SDragon
Here's what I got after some experiments. Is this what you were looking for?
by the way what are the options you used for that cape? -
Quote:looks good. but trying to go for more cute lolita style not vampire. Also she is younger looking. Not trying to make her kinky or sexy. just a cute version ultra cute.Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha
How's about this?
-
k something like this
or this
yeah we have stuff that is kind of close. but it feels more like there wearing fur then wearing those painful dresses of the olden days. -
Quote:um yeah. Ladies dont wear jackets. And I said gothic Dress. aka a Dress. yeah the bolero is okay but they still dont have a good dress for it.Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow
They're identical except for hair and tie colour, vest (one with and one without) and shoulders. Proportions have not change between the pics.
And I'm not sure if the Baron jacker is available for females, but I'm pretty sure the Bolero is not available for males.
so far they have been good about giving us revealing/kinky old outfits. but some characters more is actualy more sexy. go figure sometimes having more clothes on is more attractive. hmm. -
Quote:wait wait what. damn that is good. how the heck did you get that together. nice work. though i am going more female side. oh and cute and young. cough i already have my dark kinky outfit. But then you would have to know my characters name to realize why I have my outfits in certain styles.Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow
-
kind of what i am trying to pull off with one of my characters.
http://lolita-handbook.livejournal.com/3035.html#cutid1
yes i am trying to make one of my girl toons a lolita. but no dress out right now is anything close to it. -
no i just have to wait for gothic style outfits. A good gothic dress and maybe a mens suit from the time period would be great.
-
Quote:Now I want to see the Devs reaction to those pictures. How many bet that most the devs play D&D. Here is a question to the devs then. What would your D&D character be?Originally Posted by Hydrophidian
FREEDOM PHALANX: FANTASY EDITION
You may wonder... what do the members of the Freedom Phalanx do during their downtime? Well, believe it or not, sometimes they get together in the back room of The Wizard's Well, and War Witch runs a little D&D session for them... -
more erotic as in his FFXI web comic. Wink wink. Final Fantasy with epic humor and sex appeal, for the ladies and guys and the cat.
by the way has anyone started to read all the tags this has. It sums up all the furry hate and misconceptions quite nicely.
Oh I had to add my own sorry. It is the random one. -
Maybe when I17 comes out we might get a flood of non nekos
Grr I hate nekos so much. Sorry it is cause there is so many of them. There oversaturated. To many cat girls for me. Need more wolves. -
Quote:Not me much. Now it just bugs me how they have the tails so high up on the body. but then most games do that. a tail wouldn't exit from that point. I am so nitpicky. lolOriginally Posted by BackAlleyBrawler
Do you get asked about that a lot?
-
*cries*
I can't draw humanoids at all. I love all your peoples art but I can't do anything close to it. Some day I need to pay someone to do pictures for some of my characters. I love to make characters and write stories for them. grr. -
by the way anthro does include "were" creatures. aslong as it is more of a shape changer or a mixture. not just stuff being slapped on.
But overall i dont like alot of the transformation furry stuff. But then all my werewolf toons dont shapechange much. there stuck in a half wolf/human state as such they would have to find ways to hide there animal side if people in the stories had trouble.
I have a D&D socerer who is a werewolf that is dragon desended. Oh and is andro. -
cough don't you notice who is the artist in the video?
It is fred perry. The creator of gold digger.
I really love his stuff. He does great comics. Also love the FFXI web comic he does. He can draw good characters, and do sex appeal if you want. For both ladies and guys. -
Yes lola. dang sorry.
I was so brain dead at the momment that i couldn't think of her name. I knew it was babs but it was the only name i could think of. But Lola was literaly made to make us furries get a _____. Now babs was created to showcase the female side. And I love that they did that. Oh and minerva is soooo tame it isn't even funny. And WB has a track record for suggestive content is off the scale. For WB it is how can we slip this joke/person through the Fox censors. Wink wink "Fingerprints"
By the way noone has answered my question yet about the Flagging. Pretty please can I beat the guy up. -
Quote:Okay the question here though. Is she hot cause of anthro or all the guns?Originally Posted by Liz Bathory
Marvel's take on a furry female...
I say guns oooh so many guns.
And if you want to go on the subject of WB and anthro. Actualy if you are going to compare a female version of bugs that was made for sex appeal. You have to look at Babs. Flatout she was made to "spring" all the anthro lovers in the movie "Space Jam"
I see your anthros and raise you one I like. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rmbN6-T-UE
and you know what all the bleepin furry hate made this video get a adult tag. I call Foul. What about this dang video screams only adults more then the orginal video for stacy's mom?
Can I beat the crap out of the people that flagged the video? -
Quote:Then do you think that when GR comes out that Brutes will fill in tanking spots more?Originally Posted by Lucky666
Of course they can, Yes. Look at redside content usually harder and even the LRSF many of whom would argue is harder then the STF and redside doesn't have tanks just brutes and it all seems to work out.
Currently I don't see a reason, when GR comes out, to use a tank anymore if I can have a brute. I almost feel that they might even be more played then scrappers. I mean comeon a scrapper that takes more of a beating. What about that doesn't sound good? This coming from a guy that can't stand Tankers and rarely main tanks. -
To be honest and fair to fireminded. we should actually be comparing Tankers to Brutes. Since Brutes have the same damage output before inherents as scrappers and closers survivability to the tankers. Why is it again that I would play a tanker?
As is my DM/Elec can survive about anything out there before sets. What is even more buff is a Brute version since he can have higher resistances. My scrapper can hit it resistance hard cap easy which is better then being soft capped defense. A brute gets 15% more resistance.
You should really be comparing ATs that are like each other. A scrapper is melee damage period. A tanker is to tank period. A brute is to tank period. That is there designed roles. As such it is hard to compare ATs. The interesting comparison will be Brutes and Tankers. and what will happen with GR.
So here is my question to the posters. Can a Brute on average do the job of a Tanker while doing more damage then a tanker? And yes I know that tankers will always be able to take more of a beating then brutes. I am talking averages. -
i Will have to find the post again. It has been said a couple of times. A dev even made a specific post about it. I think it might have even been mentioned in the Herocon video.
here is a part.
http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?t=196732
there was also a dev coming out and saying you don't have to have GR to team with GR characters. -
Quote:they stated earlier. and for the last time. if you side switch you can team with that other side and you don't need GR to team with them from the perspective of the other side.Originally Posted by Shadow Wail
I see this happening. We have three teaming pools ( 1 red, 1 blue and coop) and made it so that people on the same side of the game can team with anyone that aligns themselves with that side. In the coop zones you can mix the teams.
Let me shorthand this:
Red side only :Party A
Blue side only :Party B
As the game is pre-GR we can do:
A+A= REDSIDE
B+B= BLUESIDE
A+B= COOP ZONE
Post-GR we could have this (and what I am afraid of)
Red Side
Villain= Party A
Vigilante+ Party A1
Blue Side
Hero=Party B
Rogue=Part B1
Teaming Parameters:
Blue side
A+A= BLUESIDE
A+A1=BLUESIDE
A+A1+B+B1= COOP ZONE
Red Side
B+B=REDSIDE
B+B1=REDSIDE
B+B1+A+A1= COOP ZONE
I don't see this happening:
A+A1=BLUESIDE
B+B1=REDSIDE
A+A1+B+B1= COOP ZONE
B+B1+A+A1= COOP ZONE
Since they are creating a new alignment, there will be four teaming pools and for most part the game has always had three teaming possibilities but now that there is GR we have 4 of them. If the devs wanted to they could make it so that to team with a member of the new alignment you have to have GR...didn't they do this with CoV and PD? I remember you having to have both games to play in PD with a villain.
So a hero that side switched can team villians, that don't own GR. They stated that GR doesn't preclude teaming just not having GR mean you can't switch sides.
All there doing is adding script to heroes and villians saying you can team vigilante or rogue.
the reason they didn't do that with heroes and villians cause the code is written don't do this or do this when there around. but if you add a whole new name that isn't scripted anywhere you can get rid of those conflicts. Redside precludes heroes from teaming with villians but if your a vigilante then the code won't have conflicts. It is the easier work around. The hard part is writing the code that removes all instances of hero from you and posts vigilante in there instead.
