-
Posts
619 -
Joined
-
-
I thought Judge Dredd was the only time Rob Schnieder has ever been funny, ever.
-
Quote:Well, I did mention PS, too.Glad someone mentioned Homestuck. It's predecessor, Problem Sleuth, is also well worth reading.
But yeah, Homestuck is by far the best webcomic on the internet at the moment. It has a deep plot that can get very dramatic without sacrificing the comedy. Something badass happens every few comics (the rate increases constantly, with more and more happening, to the point where there are often long strings of pages that are just way awesome). Plus, the pages that have sound to them are always epic win (and there are a lot of them).
Read Homestuck. All of you. Right now. -
XKCD, the smartest webcomic on the internet.
Irregular Webcomic (the writer later made Darths & Droids), the smartest webcomic on the Australian internet
Homestuck. Above all other webcomics, this one must be read. Also listen to the soundtrack. And have fun playing the Act 4 intro (it is a godly multimedia masterpiece).
Also read Problem Sleuth, it's pretty good. -
-
Quote:Thank you.Fine, fine, I retract.
In fact, Twilight is actually slightly better than most WWE Slash.
Of course, what you said about Buffy is so wrong as to make that bit of incorrectness look like unalienable truth, so there's no point in even thinking about it any further. -
-
Quote:-Marcian is one of the four lords of the boards, so he can argue with me. Doesn't mean he'll win, though.Let me see what I gathered from this conversation...
- The Llama is arguing with the Lord
- Buffy>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Twilight
- Goat Girl is a bloody idiot
- I'm not British
- ManOf speaks the truth. Those that pick the path of the powerful but squishy player are almighty in the long run.
-True dat.
-DOUBLE True dat.
-Okay, then.
-I think you missed what I was going for there. I was saying that Twilight-haters talk about the sparkling so much more because it's an easy target, whereas the pedophilia and stalking are more obscure, but much better points to make. -
Quote:Another reason the whole "sparklepire" thing is so popular:I'm saying three people in a very specific thread that were pre-warned what the "wrong" answer was before giving the "right" one don't disprove my statement about a population at large.
Me: "A thousand people picked the blue box. That is wrong."
You: *Picks up Red Box* "See!? A thousand people didn't pick the blue box!"
Me: "..."
---
I just said that I find a certain answer offensive. An answer I've seen across the internet by hundreds (thousands?) of people for years. Do you really think demonstrating that you are capable of parroting what I consider a less-offensive answer proves that I didn't see those things?
You ever play TF2? Good players, they go for the Medic. Yeah, he's smaller than the dude with the chaingun, but he's a better pick in the long run for targets. All the new players and bad players go for the Heavy, because he's big and obvious and they figure if he's so easy to hit, why even bother aiming at the little guy next to him.
Do you see where this metaphor is going? -
Quote:1. That's because I warned you on Skype.1) I already took back the Buffy thing. Read the post above yours where I take it back. Smooth stab there, mate.
2) If you are listing why you don't like Twilight, you are missing the entire damn point of my post. I've explained it three times now. Go re-read.
2. I'm actually listing why everyone who has ever posted in CaH/VC's Twilight threads has said they hate Twilight. And me also. -
Meh. The original movie was awesome, end of story.
I could have totally seen Sly in the sequel going, "Gaze into the fist of Dredd," to that one Dark Judge. -
Quote:So, you're saying the stance that everyone thus far has taken is not the stance everyone is taking?Again. I'm not discussing what you, Arkasas, ManOf or any one individual person thinks of the series. I think that they're awful, terrible things. Just... just bad.
But that is not the tact people take when taking it down. That isn't the tactic they take. That's my point.
And I think New Moon was very well directed. Even if it was garbage. -
Quote:Are you seriously trying to claim Buffy wasn't marketed to young girls? Really?I see.
You know, I'll say what I haven't said on these forums before but I've come to believe is true: By the numbers, the majority of people don't hate Twilight because it's bad; They hate it because the number 1 franchise in America is something marketed to young women. That it's "in" to like cheesy romance and talking about your feelings. The rest came later.
My theory. Now, you know that I Twilight. Viciously. But the things that everybody hates about Twilight is distinctly feminine. The brooding. The emo. The sparkles. These are traditionally girly things. And those are the ones that everyone mentions.
Buffy beats the snot out of vampire mythos something awful. But it does so in favor of grim darkness, an aim at an older audience, fight scenes, and lesbians. Suddenly, no one really minds that one as much.
Yes, I'm playing this card. I've been holding onto it for months.
It's also why I no longer really participate in Twilight Hate-Fests.
Buffy was a show for girls. Guys (like myself) may have liked it, but it was aimed at the female audience. Furthermore, it was actually fairly accurate in its portrayal of vampires. The reason so many vampires in Buffy were "pretty" is because, as shown, a lot of vampires-to-be were seduced because they were attractive and their sire wanted some hot arm candy. Plus, when they went all-out, they took on a fairly monstrous appearance, not to mention the way that their leader from the first season looked (which is presumed to be what all vampires will look like after being undead long enough).
They were weak to sunlight, fire, decapitation, holy water, stakes through the heart, crosses, and possibly garlic (don't remember if it ever came up), all the classic vampire weaknesses. They could not enter the home of a living person without being invited in, nor could they cross a threshold marked with a cross. They took most of their mythos from Bram Stoker, granted, but it's basically him and European folklore that stand as the two "true" sources for vampire lore. They were, at most, 10% away from being correct.
This is of course working under the tennant that when it comes to interpreting folklore, one does not need to include every single aspect of the creature discussed, but one should at least hit all the major points, and try to avoid tossing in some random thing that has nothing to do with them (i.e., sparkles).
Twilight vampires are, well, not vampires. Not even close. To imply that Buffy does anything even remotely similar is an insult to the very concept of fiction. Furthermore, Twilight presents several other horrible concepts:
-Breaking into a girl's house and watching while she sleeps is romantic.
-If a boy is verbally abusive and acts like he hates you, it must be TRUE LOVE.
-If said boy gets you teen pregnant, it's not the most horrifying thing ever for the other boy you rejected to mention that he has every intention of getting with your daughter as soon as she's legal. -
Quote:No, we get extra Sue-hating priveleges.Everyone notices that it's a Mary Sue when it's a girl Mary Sue.
I think comic book geeks pretty much waive the right to wave something off as waves of Mary Sues, be they Twilight's Vampires or the Witches of Waverly Place.
Also, the male term is Marty Stu. Or Wesley Crusher. -
Bit of trivia: traditional folklore actually characterizes vampires as compulsive counters, going so far as to advise people wandering at night to carry boxes of matches or similar items to throw to the ground should a vampire appear, causing him to be forced to count them while you flee. This actually makes Count von Count a more accurate vampire than Edward Cullen.
-
Yet more bigotry from GG. Surprise, surprise.
EDIT: Also, this thread is now about the most irritating man in the world (mild language warning) -
-
-
This is the Minister of Awesome, with a public service announcement:
Hi. I know, in this day and age, it can be hard to come up with entirely original ideas. That's why it's okay to "borrow" concepts from time to time. But when someone can actually itemize what you're copying and what you're copying from, you have to face the fact that you have a problem.
*The More You Know*
Taken from MTG:
-Tapping
-Lands (Artifact Lands in this case, to be specific)
-Booster cards (which are just Equipment and Enchantment combined into one category)
Taken from HeroQuest:
-The backstory
-More powerful units are unique hero characters (although there are a lot of sources, this one just seems the most likely), the most powerful are giant monsters.
Taken from Yu-Gi-Oh:
-Levels 1-4 are free, 5+ costs something
-Trap cards
-The play phases (minus the Standby phase)
Taken from some combination of Warhammer 40K, Warmachine, and possibly also MTG:
-The factions
Misc.
-The Commander mechanic is basically a combination of the basic Life mechanics from MTG with the Magi from Magi-Nation Duel, though that may not necessarily be intentional (MND wasn't that well known).
Now, it's fine if your stuff was a little derivative, pretty much everything is nowadays, but when nearly your entire game is taken from less than five sources, you might want to consider thinking of ways to innovate. Because believe me, nobody likes copycats, just ask Duel Master. -
Quote:Hey!Not aerodynamic enough.
But you could combine your desire to gold with the desire to whack someone in the head and hit them in the head with a nine iron, hoping to strike hard enough to sever their head and send it flying across the fairway. In fact, I'd love to see a gameshow based around burying annoying people up to their necks, then taking whacks at the exposed heads with golf clubs. Winner is the one who manages to do sever the head of 'their' celebrity with the least strokes. There wouldn't be any prizes, though. Knocking the heads off of people like Paris Hilton or Richard Simmons should be considered a reward in its own right.
What does everyone have against Richard Simmons? He's actually a very nice guy in real life, or so I've heard. And all he wants is to increase national awareness of obesity, and believe me, America needs it (although, if TLC specials are to be believed, so does the UK). -
-
-
There's a difference between being insane and just plain not listening. I mean, it's an issue of standards. Let's try to be professional, shall we?
Honestly, you work for the Ministry of Awesome. Show some pride in your work. -
-
Well, it's the timing. Honestly, after all this other stuff, that is the thing that makes you finally decide that something is weird? Really?