Magpie_Mouse
-
Posts
157 -
Joined
-
Yes, because these incoming f2p players aren't real people.
Commence with the wringing of hands. -
Quote:Who the hell are you?Originally Posted by Xanatos
Herro -
Quote:That's your problem, not mine.Originally Posted by Tramontane
Yeah, really not winning any points on the "Not-an-*******" scale here.
-
Quote:I don't hate roleplaying. I just hate 99% of the roleplayers out there.Originally Posted by Tramontane
If you hate roleplaying that much you could always not participate rather than being ********.
Just sayin' -
Quote:They might be authors, but they're more the worst of fanfiction.net than Shakespeare.Originally Posted by Mariel_Martog
Someone earlier said RP players are similar to writers, I do agree with that statement. Because, we are all authors when playing the RP side of this game.
-
Quote:Welcome to the CoH forums.Originally Posted by Electric-Knight
A bunch of ridiculous, pseudo-intellectual, completely misguided think-it-alls stuck in their own opinions and incapable of seeing things from anywhere but their own eyeballs...
-
Quote:All I read were multi-paragraphs saying CO makes them look ugly! which is, again, not the fault of the concept, but of it's implementation in that specific game.Originally Posted by Ironik
Since we've given specific reasons why it's bad and you just keep saying, "Nuh-uh, you guys are doodyheads," I'm going to consider this a win on the anti-CO-character-editor side. Thanks for playing.
But okay, keep thinking you won. -
-
Quote:And you folks are still hyper-focusing on CO's implementation of it and screaming DO NOT WANT.
Ironik and Sam_Tow say words. -
Quote:No kidding.Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow
Specific portions of the theoretical design of that editor are decent, but the editor itself is some of the worst, least intuitive things I've seen in a while, and it's stocked with about 90% garbage. Also, because of how many of the things are rigged, it's next to impossible to make anything that isn't butt ugly unless you stick to a small selection of predefined body and face shapes anyway. As a thought experiment, that editor works. As an actual tool to use, it's horrible.
But I'm mocking the absolute refusal to even think about such a system due to fanboy tunnel vision.
Don't blame the concept when it should be pointed towards developer ineptitude. -
Quote:Yeah, because more scalable options for a characters proportions are a bad thing.Originally Posted by Ironik
Dear God no. Terrible idea. Kill it! Kill it with fire!
-
Quote:Any of the oldies might remember Angelus/Geisha. When Pocket D was still young, and before /getglobalname, Ang made a character named Mother Kindly. Going around the D, Kindly would read the bios of other characters and use the information written therein to abrubtly throw it ICly in the other character's face in a very cryptic and creepy way.Originally Posted by Silver Gale
This is useless to good RPers, and a goldmine to metagamers. I'd suggest not putting anything about your character in the bio that you wouldn't expect to come up during a casual interaction with another character. If they are secretly the lost heir of a small European country, which you are planning on revealing in a suitably dramatic fashion in an upcoming storyline? Don't put in the bio. The best thing that happens is that everyone who RPs with you will ignore it. The worst thing is that a character with connections in the international intelligence community will make a few phone calls and hack into a database, and announce their "discovery" to the entire bar.
Since this was before /getglobalname, I didn't know and raged in globalchat about it, while Ang basically smiled and nodded.
It really reinforced the whole 'If you don't want others to know about it, don't write it down in your bio.'
Sometimes I wish Mother Kindly or someone like it would make a return
-
Quote:Then you're just looking for justification for your trolling for futa-on-X dockings.Originally Posted by Catministrator
And then there are folk who -are- interested in the material; either in a superficial level or one similar to my own.
Oh you rascal! -
Quote:Pretty much this. It's hard to do well, and right, while trying to also go 'romance rp' (which is just the apologist's way of justifying ERP, IMO. But I digress.) without running into the creepy fetishists that dominate those genres of RP.Originally Posted by Void_Huntress
Stuff.
-
No, no, no!
But you can spill all the screwdrivers you want after that!
Although you shouldn't be spilling them in the first place..
Alcohol abuse, man. Not cool. -
Eis, you need one of these.
-
Will you be the first person to make a non-objectified futa character?
Hmm.. catgirl with huge mammaries, penor and skimpy clothing.
I remain skeptical. -
whooooosh!
-
And yes, AE is still killing the game
-
Quote:Originally Posted by MondoCool
And thus we have [THIS SENTENCE HAS BEEN CENSORED BY THE BUREAU OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS DUE TO RELIGIOUS INSENSITIVITY] and everything in the vein of that.
-
I suppose it depends what is more prevalent, the spoken part or the emoted part. If there's more spoken, and the action is fairly minor, then *****. Otherwise, italics.
-
Quote:Just as I'm entitled to not acknowledge your bastardization of an AT. There's limits to what I can tolerate before being 'unique' means 'I'm a special snowflake Mary Sue.'Originally Posted by seebs
You are, in fact, welcome to use any power set to represent any thing you want.
Two way streets and all that.
-
I see AE has killed CoH.
Again.
-
Quote:Hot damn, I want some of that sparkly cheese.Originally Posted by The_Spartan
-
Quote:Originally Posted by terrible_deli
Thumbs up marketing team.Quote:
Kotaku 