JKwervo
-
Posts
845 -
Joined
-
NERFS hurt the general populace and at the same time gives them a sense of feeling that what was done somehow someway deterred the "farmers."
I laugh at this. Farmers will always find away, and you know....they welcome the nerfs. Nerf some more. Keep nerfing till there's nothing left to nerf, and the farmers will ALWAYS be ahead of the curve. That's how powergamers/farmers work. They will always be ahead of the curve.
I for one, welcome the nerfs just so that more people QQ. It doesn't affect me, because as a powergamer, I will find another way to gain rewards at a MORE effecient manner than normal.
I say kudos to nerfs! KEEP NERFING! While I gain my rewards faster than most.
-
Quote:An illusion. You're not breaking the mold. At all.
My prescence here will influence many in future post to sound less generic and simple when speaking of viabily. The example in you set in zones is literal proof of much my overall points Conflict although I don't expect you to see that. But at least the "new" pvpers that come in and read your (false) statements will come to realize what not to be. You are prime example of that as you've continually proven time and time again by your delusional rebuttals.
People in here will TRUST the words and opinions of Mac, Conflict, Barrier, Supermax, and the others that have spent their time and effort into testing and playing PvP.
They will not trust yours. They will only ridicule it. They will cast it aside, and you will nothing more than just an example of what NOT to be in PvP, or in general. The fact that you THINK even remotely that everyone here is raging is a fallacy. The fact that you think you are notorious gives you a sense of pride. Although, I highly doubt that your notoriety is based on your knowledge, but rather, your ignorant and delusional vision of "balance" PvP is so farfetched, that even the noobiest of noobs can understand that what you spew is filled with sewage the likes of a third world country.
Basically, it is all garbage. But hey, keep thinking you're breaking the mold. To us, you are just a form of entertainment we reply to, to boost our Post Count.
-
Quote:Originally Posted by Dahjee
I'm not here to troll. Don't make this about me so much.... make it about the stuff I said if possible. I show up to discuss the topic, if what I say is debatable... then debate it. don't turn the thread topic into Dahjee posts, or hide behind wanna-be funny replys. If Iwanted to read pictures... I'd read baby books.
As far as a quote well the intial results of I13 speak for themselves. Test league go boom!? There is really only one Dev quote needed for my simple point. It is the one in my previous post that stated the purpose of I13... You must be honest and ask yourself if that purpose really fit the purpose of high end serious arena I pwnt datazz PvP boi mentality! Nah. It's was and sadly still basically remains a purpose and practice of seeking the absoulte best sets/sets to win matches. Getting the options to revert back to something at least similar to I12 didn't help the matter... but I was happy to see some of the QQ'ing stop.
Btw did you here about the Incarnate system coming soon? You know I'm sure hope they thought to plan ahead and make needed changes in PvP before dropping this abilty to make players even stronger on us! I'm almost certain ths plan would likely invlove this preparation to almost look like a nerf... kinda like ED before IOs and such.
With all the great advice and suoerior common knowledge here on the boards though, I'm sure the silly devs could never think of doing something like this... cause you know the guys here PvP more than they do and stuff.
-
Yeah, same toon on the match. it's only 1 match per 2 fighters. 3 matches per card. 45 minute total event.
-
I forgot the office one. Small-Medium maps are best for Duels, in regards to spacing and size.
-
just an FYI to everyone's that expressed interest, the UDC will go into effect most likely AFTER the Pinnacle Cup Season 1.
The UDC is NOT seasonal. It is open ended so therefore there are no SCHEDULE restraints unless already scheduled by parties involved. The way this works is exactly like boxing/UFC.
Also, we need to discuss what maps SHOULD be used in arena, because obviously, there are HUGE maps.
I was thinking a match map template, meaning these are the only maps that will be used in matches because they are reasonably sized maps for a 2 person match; Cage, Perez Park, Graveyard, and Tech Lab.
If everyone agrees that ANY map should be used, then let's do that. Although I highly think it's interesting playing in the EDEN map with only 2 people. o_O -
Quote:^--- winOriginally Posted by pixel
as a d6 player, the league has already taught me everything i need to know about high-end pvp: If you can't beat it, ban it, dq it, or ragequit.
-
Quote:
Don't let the smoove taste fool you. 
-
I think everyone just got dahjee'd bad. lol Obvious troll is obvious. No one can be that stupid (I might be wrong on this due to his 5 month troll streak.....). Not even Sentry4 was THAT stupid.
-
This is retarded. IF a vote on limiting taunters will be in effect, and IF (and i mean a big IF) if passes, I'm pretty sure the D6 section of the League will fold.
-
Nah. Just need to know how if anyone got a drop and how many. AND GRATZ!
-
Quote:lolwut?Originally Posted by Dahjee
You got it Mac. Stop being mad at me btw. I need your numbers skills for future posts. I will try and answer to the best of my ability.
I'm decent but I still have questions. Please be objective with me when I ask them.
What's more exciting is that is worked!
lrn!
lolQuote:Dahje's are natives of Virtue. We sure do know how to breed them! -
Quote:wow....
I've used Cage on spike targets -
Quote:^------- This.Originally Posted by Slax
Taunt isn't broken.
I'd never play for a tie, but it's a valid tactic. If I were to play for a tie I'd bring a way more retarded lineup than discussed here.
Saying that this is unfair to d6 but if you do it, I'll sit my d6rs (someone call the DQ police) and beat you 2v6 is highly hypocritical.
I don't like AT limits (even the stalker limit, which I voted for).
I don't like the slippery slope of banning lineups one doesn't like to play against. -
Quote:It really is quite sad how pathetically full of himself he is. lolOriginally Posted by Dahjee
lolseriousPvP... you mean arena matches right?
I'm here because I need to be. In time you might understand what that means. -
Quote:Again...I'm D6, and I'm not quitting PvP altogether. If the D6ers you have can't handle the Taunt Lineup, then learn better.Originally Posted by Daknah
Im just saying that it was not run because of lack of people having toons it was run because you had no faith in an emp.
d6ers are going to quit the league and probably pvp all together if the only matches they see are vs 4 taunters 2 emps. I know if i was a d6er id quit if that was the case.
Why do I not want a limit on taunters? Because if the situation calls for playing for a tie, then that's a valid tactic. It's boring? yes. Is it a valid tactic? yes.
Stop making it out like we have to "Save" the D6ers we have from quitting! The whole drama the fell out with the whole DQ things already did that. But to punish those that can only bring Tanks/Brutes as a valid PvP toon is not the way to go. If that's all they can field, and they have to be played...why punish a tactic that warrants a team with a tie to get points? It's strategy.
It's like saying don't tp drone plz, cos that's not fair! Or, hey...I have insps, but limit that because it'd be boring to watch you pop greens and not get killed!
Taunt is not broken iirc. Reason why stalkers were limited was due to crazy shrakz attackkgo! The majority said it was broken, so limit stalkers because of that, save a few like barrier and such. (I also didn't agree with limiting Stalkers btw, because Limiting things is like training wheels that people will get used to and not learn to adapt when they venture out in to "high end" pvp)
Yeah, you want to exclude D6 from D8 rules, but that's stupid. It's stupid because why have separate rules when the same basic mechanics are applied except you have 2 less to work with. So what? Learn2adapt is the basic saying isn't it? -
So sad.
-
Quote:lolOriginally Posted by xanatos
see how angry the wild dahje gets when his habitat is threatened.
-
@Daknah
Like Barrier said....if we limit on this....why can't we limit on other things? TAUNT is not broken. Therefore, people need to adapt and learn to deal with taunters. There are ways to beat an ALL TAUNT team.
Fun is subjective. Just because it's a dickmove to most (which i don't know why), but LOL rules in PvP. Like seriously.....if there will be a limit to taunters, then I want a limit to Psi/Ems and Glad Jav Procs they're allowed to have. See how silly limitations are?
P.S: I like my team. I learned a lot from them. A LOT. They're a fun bunch and not crybabies and drama filled like most teams are in this league. If you didn't sense my sarcasm in my post, then perhaps I need to practice a bit more on my sarcasm meter. -
Quote:yayakthnx! :POriginally Posted by XFUNK
let's focus on one pvp event at a time kthx.....also tl;dr will get the condensed version later.
-
I'm a D6er, and I don't want limits on TAUNTERS. At all. If that happens....I want limits on Psi/EMs. Because I'm so bad I can't evade from spikes at all, let alone break LOS on taunts.
Quote:It'll still be OPed. Just like taunt is.If you think that psi em damage is op and cant heal through it you are welcome to come practice with us and we will teach you the best we can. -
Like I said earlier.....if limiting tanks/brutes in a team to limit Taunt is going to go forward....I propose the captains vote on limiting PSI/EMs as well because their delayed damage is just ridicolous. SO MUCH DAM! DO EEEET NAO! DOOO EEEEET!!
-
Variety. Not just super heavyweight.
