Claws/WP versus Fire/Shield
Their both good combos, but they do different things.
Fire/Shield does *tons* of damage, especially when IO'ed out. Conversely, it is frail, and you will need to invest in IO sets in order to bring up its damage mitigation to a decent level.
Claws/WP is much tougher then Fire/Shield, and requires very little in the way of IO's to be effective. It deals good damage, but not as much as Fire/Shield. However, Claws/WP is significantly tougher then Fire/Shield.
I disagree that the claws/wp is "tougher" than the fire/sd. A fire/sd will run circles around the claws/wp if he is built right. Capped defense, +dmg aura, and Fiery melee being such a potent set that is not resisted by many enemy groups, I think the f/sd would be better in most situations.
ITF gives both SD and WP problems. Defense debuffs are rampant, but sd has more debuff resistance built in than WP does.
Words to the wise aren't necessary- it's the stupid ones that need them.
"You're right...I forgot...being constantly at or the near the damage cap is a big turn off. Definitely not worth it."
- Vitality
I disagree that the claws/wp is "tougher" than the fire/sd. A fire/sd will run circles around the claws/wp if he is built right. Capped defense, +dmg aura, and Fiery melee being such a potent set that is not resisted by many enemy groups, I think the f/sd would be better in most situations.
ITF gives both SD and WP problems. Defense debuffs are rampant, but sd has more debuff resistance built in than WP does. |
If you factor in all the IO;s that makes Shield Tough, Willpower becomes Invincible.
Seriously. A heavily IO'ed out WP brute will pretty much just NOT die.
I'm wondering which toon I should make and focus on IOing out next. Out of your guys' opinions, which would be more fun, and what would I get more mileage out of in general brute terms? I'd like to at least tank Rommie on the ITF and solo pretty damn well on some ridiculous settings. I do plan on IOing out these guys, although I usually don't touch purples.
Any advice?