Marvel vs DC


Crestent

 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
But yes I will say that Fantastic 4 was better then Spiderman 3. When the only redeaming quality of a film is their 3rd string villian (Venom) then there is something SERIOUSLY wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know how you can call Venom a third-string villain when the symbiote plot was introduced earlier on (literally, a scene before) than Sandman. Or how he was the only "villain" in the entire movie who remained, from start to finish, a "villain." Eh, it's all subjective anyway... but worse than Fantastic 4? I'll just agree to disagree.

And I never said I didn't take comic-based movies seriously. I just like to take my eggs with a grain of salt.


 

Posted

I prefer my eggs with seasoned salt and a hint of oregano.

I guess that says something about my tastes in comic book films too.

I call Venom a 3rd string villain because although the symbiote was introduced early on we never saw VENOM until the last half hour where he promptly died (ZOMG SPOILERS). I felt Venom needed his OWN movie and Topher Grace proved it by making him the only thing I actually got into during the whole film even though he had the least camera time.

ANYWAY, i'm cool with agreeing to disagree. Like I said, it's all a matter of opinion and the whole egg analogy (which turned out alot better then I expected) so ya...to each his/her/it own.


@Jeffery Duke
Meanwhile...On The Internet...