UnicyclePeon said;
[ QUOTE ]
The second and subsequent force fielders or rad defenders or sonic bubblers arent welcome
[/ QUOTE ]
Right now, in your powergaming attitude, the choice between a buffing/debuffing corruptor and a dominator is clear. The corruptor gets in. How is it more fair for you to have to reject a dominator (or any other damage/tank class), but it isn't fair that you have to reject another buffer/debuffer? You said it would decrease you wanting to team with certain people, right now, you don't want to team with non buffers/debuffers, but that's alright? It isn't alright to have to reject them? Everything you said reinforces what they want to do, bring more diversification to the team, so that the tankers, scrappers, blasters, dominators, stalkers, and brutes have room in the uber team, not just defenders, corruptors, and controllers.
ValkyrieRising said;
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This would of course make for the fun situation of said local FF Defender being regularly turned down for the team because "we already have defense buffs, we need resists/heals/debuffs*"
*delete as appropriate, but you know it's gonna be heals
[/ QUOTE ]
Pretty much. Call me /unsigned. I'd rather not watch CoX go the path of all other MMOs, tyvm.
[/ QUOTE ]
How is this different than what it is now? You say you don't like this because people would have to look for other powersets they don't already have, making this a selective grouping experience. Under this proposal, everyone would have a spot in the group, and not be restricted to defenders, controllers, and corruptors to have the best possible group. It is already restrictive, to only 3 ATs to have that group that can decimate a Ruthless mission.