-
Posts
2987 -
Joined
-
Quote:http://giveupinternet.com/wp-content...e-internet.jpg09-17-2010 00:01:06 [Broadcast] Relted Mubber: Dub quit
Do I win a Internetz?
((The names have been changed to protect the innocent)) -
Quote:I miss having Trez around, tbh.ty Yeah, we're pretty calm for the most part...except for Pixel. That dude rages like 24-7. Oh, and our team is starting a side competition for most matches missed during this league. I think Lib's putting some bbq pork up for prizes, though I'm not sure how well it'll keep through December. Pixel and Mebs are falling behind by actually showing up to all our matches so far. lol@them
He's usually 100% good natured until a spike comes in, then he's like RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH .
I won't lie when I say I sometimes skipped healing him just to see what his rage would be like. >.> -
Quote:A:Show him a series of The Tick comics/TV shows. Then go back to sipping chamomille.
In the following standard evil vizier scenarios, what is the candidates response
If one of your advisors asks, "My liege/lord/leader, he is but one man. What can one man possibly do?"
Quote:If your trusted lieutenant asks, "Why are you risking everything on such a mad scheme?"
Quote:If one of your dungeon guards expresses concern over the conditions in the beautiful princess' cell?
Quote:If the beautiful princess that you capture declares, "I'll never marry you! Never, do you hear me, NEVER!!!"?
Quote:If your are fighting with the hero/heroine atop a moving platform, have disarmed him/her, and are about to finish him/her off when he/she glances behind you and drops flat?
Quote:If after you've captured the hero/heroine, he/she pleads, "Before you kill me, will you at least tell me what this is all about?" -
Quote:
Also, maybe it's just that I'm sheltered by the good-natured team I've been lucky enough to be a part of, but when it comes to PvP events, the forums always look like a total shitstorm, whereas the events themselves are generally very amicable and fun. If you're just laughing from the outside at this "farce", you're missing out. Grab a toon, find a team, get yerself in on some fun.
Couldn't agree more, I've been having a blast with our team.
Exit's been carrying us, but Peril's been Obi-Wan Kenobi dispensing wisdom.
Joe's been more like Han Solo shooting stuff, while I've been one of the extras sleeping in a corner. We won't even get started on Philly, she's like the rookie that keeps it fun for us all.
-
Update your roster on the boards, as the rules state you need to, and there will be no issues right?
Seriously Bud. Be the bigger man, take your good PvP skills and mentor your team and others here. I know you can do it, I've seen you bring PoN and the Champion server together for tons of events in the past.
Look at it as a point of pride. If you can take the high road, your SG will respect you and everyone else on the server that has had rocky histories with you will at least gain some additional esteem for you.
GL in your matches. -
Quote:I don't think there's a vote Bud, though I'll gladly be corrected.Just curious, and Im sure I'll be banned or kicked or something for asking this, but...lol, again on vent we were talking and I have been nominiated to be the one to ask since I really dont care.....
When do we get to vote on new people for the PvPec? Just curious cause I dont remember seeing elections ever held for these positions? Is this kinda like one of these self appointed positions I've been hearing about so much? reality check
You volunteer, run events and try to grow PvP interest.
Kat is running this, and overlooking other server events. -
Quote:I don't think there is a dichotomy in your last statement (well put by the way). I think if people are having fun (I'm not sure on this, I know we are...dUmb are...GDHRT seems to be, along with Exile) then the points are only mattering for e-swagger and the prizes.
Regardless of which side you stand regarding adjusting points retroactively, one thing that can be measured is the alienation happening within the league. Im far more concerned about the bad taste that is developing due to all of these issues.
As it sits right now, Champion is the only place for organized arena pvp anywhere in CoH right now. If people involved/participating in the league are assuming we are the only ones paying attention to the results, you are mistaken. As the only organized pvp at the moment, you can be assured there are eyes watching. I'd much rather see a successful season 1 with great momentum going into season 2. Will everyone be happy in the end? I'd hope so...but I know better.
But...
Is the goal to have everyone happy in the end? Or is the goal a stronger, better, more competitive atmosphere for pvp on CHAMPION server?
Lite, I know what you are saying on peering eyes. I have held my keystrokes on several issues...I've really tried not to get drama get in the way. I've played everyone that has shown up so they have fun competing.
I just want pvp to grow. Do I want to win? Hell yeah. Did we try playing for a tie? Yes we did. We talked about it on Vent in our second match against 0utcazt and Peril wanted to try a 2 Emp/TA lineup. It didn't work and we benefitted it from it, oddly enough.
Guys, it's critical we just keep fighting and put our best foot forward.
No one knows who is going to win this. I have my own thoughts on who th best 3-4 teams are, but we'll see.
Anyone who was in the Freedom ladder, remember the D6 teams? They were for new players/non-vets. dUmb picked up Pixel, Smallzies, doyler and a few others from that.
Treat this as your "D6" for Champ. Train the new young guns in evasion, give them good builds, answer questions, help them out.
I've been PvPing here for who knows how long; I've always helped people out, goodness knows there's no room for ego where my performances are concerned. But I still plug at it, hoping maybe one person out there wants to play an Ill/Emp or support and gets good at it.
Quote:
Also to be quite blunt (and this doesn't apply to everyone that has ties now) but when you bring a "safe" lineup that includes 2-3 healers or tanks in a freaking THREE VS. THREE the last thing you should expect anyone to feel is sorrow for you for getting a tie. Perhaps you weren't trying to get a tie but you damn sure knew your lineup was increasing the chances of it happening and you chose to bring it anyways so deal with it.
Quote:Now on to the voting issue. First of all enough votes are in on the motion to take ties out of the game. The answer is no. With that being said below is a short list of topics that votes are not allowed on any more. I wanted to be reasonable and not come across as a tyrant and allow Captains some voice in the event but too many personal agenda's that are not for the better of the entire league and only about their own teams winning are shining through.
Now I am going to make one more rule. No more motions for votes on any topic unless you have a minimum of 2 other Captains in favor of supporting it. That means those 2 other Captains and you must send me a p.m. with the same motion proposal. Other wise don't waste my time or the other people in the leagues time who are just here to have fun with vote issues that have no support.
P.S. I really don't want to hear about "everyone" on vent agreed to this issue or that issue. People apparently feel making others think they agree with them is more important than keeping it real because every single vote that supposedly had certain people supporting it, didn't. Just because they are your friends on vent and nod their head when you are raging doesn't mean they ACTUALLY agree with you. Reality check.
TY Kat, well said and let's move on. -
Quote:Bud, it's not a seeding/W-L-T system, it's point based.so your saying you think a team that has 5wins, 4 loss, should be in first place, where as a team that has 5 wins, 1 loss, 3 ties, should be in 5th? Could you explain the sence there?
Obviously you cant. and the reason is simple and this is also the reason we should end this discussion here....
The points system was flawed from the start, I, as well as many others saw it, said something about it in vent, others agreed, yet we said nothing. WE chose to go ahead and start playing with things as they were. We could have, (should have) said "no, wait, we need to re-look at this point structure before we start" But WE chose not to. Answers simple, we only have ourselves to blame. Play on and hope for the best is all we can do. no matter the out come, This has been a fun filled experience over all for I hope everyone.
Stop looking it at as WLT. If it were, dUmb would be way ahead of us.
You get rewarded for losing and tying and you get doubly rewarded for winning.
Myself, I'm more concerned with the favourites and keeping up to them (Looks at Psoma/Lib/Pixel/Mebs/Sir >.> ) -
Quote:This, please.
Let's stop PMing proposals to Kat on Saturday nights, to be sent out in secret for each team to discuss in their own little boxes. Bring it to the forums, hash out the best proposal that we can agree on, and submit our votes no earler than Monday. Otherwise we'll keep chasing our tails.
Kat, please limit captain proposals to one per league month so that we get past the trivial/discussable stuff. Pretty much the important stuff has been covered:
-Stalker Limit
-Map selections
-More points for wins
Quote:Retroactive/Non-retroactive, I don't care. There are way more points waiting to be earned than have already been earned (particularly with weeks 1-2 being worth less points), so the randomness should even out by the end of the season...IF WE STOP RUNNING AROUND IN CIRCLES RAGEVOTING EVERY WEEK.
People:
YOU WILL WIN GAMES. Sometimes you'll steal games, sometimes you'll be on your game, sometimes you'll lose. The gap isn't that large. Just play to win.
The last place team can go to 24 points with 3 wins next week. If they keep winning they'll be in contention.
Let's not re-do the point system and tie system every freaking week because people aren't happy with their placement.
Seriously.
Quote:
So either call this a test and start over (new Week1) or retroactively adjust things, 3 weeks is not that long either way to do things right. Shrug just the outsider, with a more level head, laughing while hearing and reading and watching this farce.
Did you not see how long this season is? It could end around the December holidays. Is anyone really going to stick around here on a Saturday during that 3-4 week period?
Besides, even if the season did restart, what will that do? The teams that have a lot of practice together and work together will do well, the teams with less practice and so on will need work.
You want to do things right?
Win.
It's the only way to get where you want to be. -
Don't want to get into the flipping thing, I thought flippers increased prices until JoJo explained it with charts, I tried it, couldn't raise prices one iota.
Edit: I tried to raise prices on Unearthed Relics (?), one of the uncommon Arcanes. I bought tons and tons of them and relisted them around 130,000 to 210,000 each. They barely ever sold. Most of them sold around 40,000 to 80,000, if I recall and then my stock got resold at close to equilibrium.
Remember, I had only the most basic knowledge of econ when I started my quest to billions...I couldn't increase prices of something trivial...
What I'd like:
PvP IO drop increases. They aren't dropping nearly enough, especially since canny PvPers in Arena avoid getting killed, which reduces chances for drops. People are pretty much getting these from farming, which is pretty sad.
Choice of level from random rolls: If I want the recipe produced at level 36, it comes out at level 36.
Re-examination of Reward Merit prices.
If I can get a Lotg 7.5 for 40,000,000 influence + 100 Reward Merits...or at 200 Reward Merits (?), that's two days of work plus trivial market sales or a week's work or massive TF grinding.
Some procs are too expensive Merit wise...seen the prices on Mako's Bite procs? You can't sell the things. How about Gift 7.5 runspeed? Decent price but worth 2 HVAM? Hmm...
I'm fine with where purple prices are...you get a decent one you can make 300 million + on it. -
Quote:
And that brings me to this latest vote. Okay, I'm all for hating on ties, but whoever asked for this vote didn't think about some possible scenarios: like if both teams bring weak damage and strong support, thinking they might get lucky and score a kill...or if teams are forced to play similarly ineffective line-ups because of a particular night's attendance, etc. What are you going to do, replay 0-0 rounds until someone just throws in the towel and goes to bed? I voted against the no-tie rule solely because of these possibilities. Look, I hate ties and when people play for them, but rules need to take into account the "what if" scenarios. If I had a better idea on how to take ties out of the equation, I'd shout it out for sure.
^^^^
100 times this.
Does anyone not remember the old Test Ladder, teams were 0-0, replay, 0-0, replay and so on. Then you keep playing on and on and on and on and on and on...
Just say no to match replays on ties. If you can't get your win, you get two points anyway.
Also, enough votes people. If you have something that you feel needs addressing, send PMs or tells to people.
There really should be a one proposal per captain per month, or a limit on votes proposed.
Kat, I know this is really annoying for you...but please set a limit on voting for stuff or the league will never advance. -
Quote:No no no I'll have none of that.Now listen here missy. Don't be coming all up in here with your logic and reasoning okay? We ain't got the time or the effort to listen to your "sound reasoning" up in here.
K?
This is the internet. A very serious place for very serious people.
MLB example:
After 4 games, the Toronto Blue Jays led the AL east with 4 W 1 L.
Toronto residents should have planned a parade right?
Except that 100+ games later, they're in fourth.
Clearly though, we should throw away the current point scoring system and find a new methodology?
I suggest:
http://www.brianmicklethwait.com/edu...ves/Abacus.gif
Or:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
Performance rating = [(Total of opponents' ratings + 400 * (Wins - Losses)) / Gms]
Of course, the Elo system DOES rank points gained/lost by the skill of the player...but I'm sure no one would ever rage over having their team be a lower ELO score because an arbitrator looked at each team fairly and either assigned them a base 1600 ELO or favoured certain other teams or individuals.
Or we could have used the old Freedom ladder point system...which gave (I think) 750 (W) 500 (T) 350 (L). Kat can correct me on this. Which would just be great...and you know, that ladder's first place ranking wasn't decided until the very last week of the league, was it?
People, just PvP. If you win the gold titles and forum titles, awesome. If not, just take it as a learning experience in playing against different people.
-
Quote:It's a bit of an overreaction to think you're out of it this early. I think we have 28 points, but dUmb is a single point behind us, two other teams are within 4-6 points. Even the lowest-seeded team has what...12 points? If they win their next three, they go to 24 points, striking distance from the top.Its Still very early in the League we will have 2 finsih another 4 weeks of fights before ( im guessing ) we go back and fight all the teams once more for the last time and then B00M its over.
what im saying is their is still a LONGTIME before this league is over so Any1 can as some1 said in a earlier post " virtually " come back from their loss of points and vice a versa.
But if it makes some teams more happy and less likely 2 try and put MORE CHANGES 2 a vote then I'll gladly vote 2 change the scoring simply becuz I dont want 2 c teams falling off the league in Rage or the feeling that they wont be #1 so why bother competeing.
Also, say we retrochange all the scores, what's to stop someone wanting to change the point system again and in circles we go.
All of the teams in this League have decent-good-very good players.
Give it time.
IT'S WEEK 3 PEOPLE. 3. The final standings won't be known for at least a month or two more. -
Really not seeing the big deal here.
The old system gave only one point from a tie and it looks like some people played for/earned a tie so they got 3 points. With the new point system, there's no reason to play for a loss or tie unless you want to play a "prevent offense" and stall someone higher in the standings, which might not work since they can win on their own.
You can't go retro-changing the point distribution, it's there. Just win more of your matches, hope for some teams to fall out of contention through play mistakes and move on. -
Arts & Crafts vs. Broken Chains
8-0 Arts & Crafts Outbreak
2-0 Arts & Crafts Perez Park
4-0 Arts & Crafts Cargo Ship
ggs -
-
Quote:I like this idea and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.What might be a simple kind of blanket fix (probably not) to everything would be to propose no more than two of any "Class" in a 3 v 3 to 5 v 5 setting.
Meaning you could run no more than 2 blasters, 2 stalkers, 2 support 2 Disruption, 2 Rads, 2 Dom's etc etc.
Blasters, stalkers, Dominators are easily covered.. they are an AT and all. Support could be emp, pain, therm, whether they are controller, defender, corruptor it doesn't matter, just limited to 2.
*Note* Having a therm, even playing him offensive most matches I can safely say its easy to switch him to a support role in 3 v 3's with basic slotting of cauterize you can pretty much keep most people alive.
Let's see how it goes and we can vote this in if it's needed. -
Emp Blaster combo was OP, people ran away from engagements too rapidly and phased too much.
Ergo, the present system. -
Quote:World of Confusion in Psi epic isn't it?Yes, a Trick Arrow/Dark Blast/*patron defender could slot every set save for Confuses, but I really don't want to play that character. (I will, however, send one million influence to anyone who can point me to a build that can slot inventions from every single set!)
So, a character slotted entirely by luck of the draw. It should be interesting. Watch this space for further developments.
That can take Coercive Persuasion.
A MM Blaster might be able to take Confuse, Aoe, Range, Melee, KB and so on as well. Add a set like AR for more AoE goodness, or perhaps Fire (Inferno is a pbaoe?) for those sets.
Good luck! -
Quote:It's really sad that Oz's team has left, they're very fun to fight.Who knows...if we can find someone to fill out Droe & Scribe's 3rd spot, maybe Oz might have a change of mind down the road after a break. Besides 8 teams just sounds better than 7.
The silver lining, though, is that 7 teams means no more ties in votes...there will always be a 4-3 majority.
Quote:First of all this is not how you ask for a vote. Second of all stop trying to make this about you and me and our past issues. That **** was supposed to be squashed. No you can not get votes to be an exception to rules. (what you asked for the last vote for) and no you do not get to vote on changing how I choose to run the league. Requiring people to publicly vote is not fair and I don't give a damn who tells you they think its a cool idea.
If an issue becomes of concern to all teams, I'll gladly consider it.
Until then, let's do our best to keep this league afloat and to make fights much closer. Any egregious line-ups can be examined as captains see fit. -
Quote:Therms have a self AoE Heal, as do emps and pains. Therms have a single target heal, as do Emps and pains.If you're really going to go with this then you need to re-evaulate what you consider a "healer"
If Therms are going to be put in the same healer class as Emps and Pains then you need to put EVERYTHING that has a Single Target heal in that healer class as well. Up to, and including Stormies with O2 Boost, MMs with Poison for Alkaloid. Otherwise you're still not even been fair.
Take therms off the list.
Just saying...Therms are more likely to be used for their debuffs though and buffs, making them an attractive hybrid AT.
I'm sure if this kind of discussion arises again (hopefully not!) it will be nuanced. -
Quote:Woot!I never thought I would say this but elkie is a ******* genious.
Based on a Captains post not matching up with what they voted I just had a talk with them and they didn't understand what they were voting for. So we are back to no healer limitations again. GLHF
Hope this makes everyone happy and looking forward to the fights.
-
Quote:i think they miss understood the question.. thinking that they agree no two healers on a
3 vs 3.. Healers assuming emps or pain doms. Again why vote yes and your the only team that brough 2 emps on a 3 vs 3 match the first week and still lose. Upset calling it not fair when a Blaster,emp, therm combo. A therm that doesnt have any buff shields and hardly heals. More like a blaster and debuffing. I just it think that the wording of the question was the issue needed more detail before people voted. Being that said there going be more tankers in the 3 vs 3 mixs thanks for those who voted yes. 1 tank, Emp, Blaster combo or the 2 tankers and emp combo ftw.
Here's what happened.
AFTER we played our three matches against you, not before, teammate goes:
"Kara, teams fielding three emps/therms/pains is crazy, it'll just end up in draws all the time. People will not be able to score kills."
Me: "Are you sure? We won't be able to play me and Philly together then, since she runs a Therm. Or Peril's Emp and my Emp wouldn't be able to team together."
Other person: "Draws are bad. Please vote this in."
Thus my vote. To be fair, I didn't really think too far past that. I certainly don't want anyone to not play, heck I've always encouraged others to PvP.
I just want to avoid situations where teams play for draws by loading in 3-5 Emps/Pain Doms/Therms.
Sigh. -
I voted to limit them, my team agreed to do so.
I've never claimed otherwise, though I'm not crazy about it since it severely limits what even my own team can bring.