-
Posts
1657 -
Joined
-
Y'know, you could just do what a few others have told me they do to find the juicy topics. Do a search for all my posts.
Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Valk was in there too. According to another poster who claimed to actually speak French, it sounded like the OP used a translator to begin with. Dunno, I don't know enough French and I don't know the person who said that well so, maybe.
[/ QUOTE ]
Damn, can't believe I missed that.
[/ QUOTE ]
Me too, I'd have loved to have seen it.
From now on I want PM's with links to all interesting threads like that.
[/ QUOTE ]
What's in it for me? -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I've got a better example. Thankfully, it finally got pulled but... No, let me just explain it.
There was a post in Player Questions, in French. If you ran it through a translator, it called the sh** and the devs should be killed, or something like that. Pretty much, French was used to bypass the profanity filter. So, a few folks posted the translation and asked the OP what their question was, yada yada. Every post with the translation was modded but the OP remained. Finally, myself and another posted explaining that OP should be run through a translator because it was offensive and we both notified our own posts. Instructions for the mods kinda.
Our posts were modded out but the OP remained. At one point, that thread had every post except the OP deleted.
I am seriously confused by that. Posts explaining what the OP said were modded but the OP, full of profanity was fine? So, if I decide to cuss out everyone, if I run it through BabelFish first, it's ok?
[/ QUOTE ]
So I should be making all my posts in french when someone needs to be told off? Sweet. How the hell did I miss that post anyways? Wouldn't have even needed a damn translator.
[/ QUOTE ]
Valk was in there too. According to another poster who claimed to actually speak French, it sounded like the OP used a translator to begin with. Dunno, I don't know enough French and I don't know the person who said that well so, maybe. -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Which is why I went on in my post to talk about what I expect to happen, which is all of us getting the smackdown laid down on us in a very heavy-handed way for at least a few weeks until we can no longer complain about "fairness" because we'll all be given the same amount of wiggle-room...namely none.
[/ QUOTE ]
Not true. Again, that would imply a fair moderation across the board to all parties at all times, but there isn't. It's not "heavy-handed", it can't possibly be because that would mean that there was consistancy in the application of the rules.
What we're saying, and I'm not sure you get the distinction, maybe I haven't been clear, is not that some posters are being treated diffreently than others, we're saying that anything you post at anytime is a crap shoot.
Again, I point to Athyna's example. That post is still up.
[/ QUOTE ]
You do realize that I'm talking about what I THINK will happen in the near future correct? I see your point and I actually agree, and I think it's going to lead us to a (hopefully short) time period in the near future where they're going to say "OK, you want fairness, here it is." and give us all no grey area at all to play in.
[/ QUOTE ]
It's just really frustrating. The post I linked is still there. Still there. I think it's the one where he advised self mutilation if you find anything offensive. Truthfully, the guy made a lot of comments that were... there's no response to.
Yet, there's a thread in this section, Happy Shplekenfugheimer's Day, it started as a joke last year. There's a joke wiki page on it, linked in that thread. Pastry celebrating, basically. My post about stringing up streudel like garland got modded. The whole thread is a joke so it's not off-topic. It's not innuendo laden. If my post should be deleted, shouldn't the whole thread be axed or moved to games? If a post about streudel is offensive, why is a post advising self mutilation still there?
I'm so confused. I hope this gets straightened out, sooner than Statesman's patented soon.
And what's wrong with streudel? -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Which is why I went on in my post to talk about what I expect to happen, which is all of us getting the smackdown laid down on us in a very heavy-handed way for at least a few weeks until we can no longer complain about "fairness" because we'll all be given the same amount of wiggle-room...namely none.
[/ QUOTE ]
Not true. Again, that would imply a fair moderation across the board to all parties at all times, but there isn't. It's not "heavy-handed", it can't possibly be because that would mean that there was consistancy in the application of the rules.
What we're saying, and I'm not sure you get the distinction, maybe I haven't been clear, is not that some posters are being treated diffreently than others, we're saying that anything you post at anytime is a crap shoot.
Again, I point to Athyna's example. That post is still up.
[/ QUOTE ]
I've got a better example. Thankfully, it finally got pulled but... No, let me just explain it.
There was a post in Player Questions, in French. If you ran it through a translator, it called the sh** and the devs should be killed, or something like that. Pretty much, French was used to bypass the profanity filter. So, a few folks posted the translation and asked the OP what their question was, yada yada. Every post with the translation was modded but the OP remained. Finally, myself and another posted explaining that OP should be run through a translator because it was offensive and we both notified our own posts. Instructions for the mods kinda.
Our posts were modded out but the OP remained. At one point, that thread had every post except the OP deleted.
I am seriously confused by that. Posts explaining what the OP said were modded but the OP, full of profanity was fine? So, if I decide to cuss out everyone, if I run it through BabelFish first, it's ok? -
[ QUOTE ]
Why is Athyna's example still up by my post asking "How many friends have you earned using this posting style?" is gone?
[/ QUOTE ]
Precisely. I understand that some things are a judgement call, but come on. Read the link, good grief, some guy proclaims that anyone who /petitions for any reason should go in a bathroom and cut their man bits off because they've been <bleeped... well no, it wasn't, but it should've been>
That thread, the posts in it, it boggles. It seriously boggles the mind. -
[ QUOTE ]
<QR>
I have a question for the people saying that they see apparantly unofffensive threads getting deleted, while other clearly rules violating posts stick around.
Do you guys actually report the offensive threads that aren't deleted? Or PM Lighthouse or Cricket about them?
[/ QUOTE ]
Yep. -
[ QUOTE ]
okay noob alert! what the heck is IBTL? I am going to cool down an stop posting for at least the night.
I have no problem with mods doing there job. I really don't. I just am really annoyed when it is not consistent.
Sorry if i have gotten anyone ticked. I really do enjoy the forums and find them really helpful in my enjoyment of the game. It just leaves a bad taste. Thanks for letting me at least blow off steam
[/ QUOTE ]
IBTL/D
In Before The Lock/Delete
Generally, the poster feels the thread in question will go away, quickly. -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I never said that everyone who chooses to break rules they don't like is always a hero and all of society should back them up every time. It's even possible that someone who objects to a given law may be wrong to do so! I still don't think that means we should accept bad, stupid, or unjust rules.
[/ QUOTE ]
True, but there are ways of protesting that don't involve 'protesting' or angry rants. You could probably say just about anything to anyone depending on how you say it.
Then again, my personal goal is to be able to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip, even so far as spending all their frequent flyer miles.
[/ QUOTE ]
I gave up on such a goal when I came to terms with the fact that if I did that, my intended target would miss the point.
[/ QUOTE ]
I like it when it's subtle enough to go over their head now but hits them later on, a few hours later.
-
Sorry, I was just trying to help. You said you didn't know why your posts went bye bye and I thought I could help.
Terribly sorry dear. I'll try not to do that anymore. -
*SB's all the skiers*
Have fun! -
[ QUOTE ]
Wow someone is really touchy! ALL my posts on this have been deleted. I guess criticism of Lighthouse is also forbidden. I would love to know what I keep saying that they don't like, I would PM lighthouse again, but I don't feel like sending a message that will just be ignored anyway
[/ QUOTE ]
Maybe stop with the name calling? It's not just the name calling but the twisting of his moniker that reeks of a deep passive agressiveness. Whatever you're so angry about, calling someone the name of a childs toy or an alcoholic beverage isn't going to win you any favors. -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Then again, my personal goal is to be able to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip, even so far as spending all their frequent flyer miles.
[/ QUOTE ]
"He had fashioned his irony on the model of that hard, cold, cruel, smooth glittering black ice that one finds only in deep gullies of the loftiest mountains; it was said in the clubs that he had found seventy-seven distinct ways of calling a man, to his face, something which only the most brazen fish-wives of Billingsgate care to call by its name, without his suspecting anything beyond a well-turned compliment. "
[/ QUOTE ]
Thank you Paul. (It's Paul, right?)
[/ QUOTE ]
That would be me, yes :-)
(The quote, I should note, is Crowley, from "Moonchild" - the man did more than invent some DOs after all)
[/ QUOTE ]
I thought you were Paul, but my memory isn't what it used to be. I figured it never hurts to ask.
Has that quote been reworded and used elsewhere? It sounds really familiar... -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Then again, my personal goal is to be able to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip, even so far as spending all their frequent flyer miles.
[/ QUOTE ]
"He had fashioned his irony on the model of that hard, cold, cruel, smooth glittering black ice that one finds only in deep gullies of the loftiest mountains; it was said in the clubs that he had found seventy-seven distinct ways of calling a man, to his face, something which only the most brazen fish-wives of Billingsgate care to call by its name, without his suspecting anything beyond a well-turned compliment. "
[/ QUOTE ]
Thank you Paul. (It's Paul, right?)
-
[ QUOTE ]
Sure. I don't think anybody here said anything like "Ranting is a great way to solve problems." BBhumeBB was responding to a few posters who said, basically, "Them's the rules! Don't break the rules!" His assertion was that blind adherence to all rules under all circumstances isn't actually a good idea. That's what I was trying to support. We're in agreement here. Cheers to you also.
[/ QUOTE ]
Oh I thought we were basically saying the same thing. I find that, sometimes, misunderstandings are avoided by just re-phrasing something. That's all.
-
[ QUOTE ]
I never said that everyone who chooses to break rules they don't like is always a hero and all of society should back them up every time. It's even possible that someone who objects to a given law may be wrong to do so! I still don't think that means we should accept bad, stupid, or unjust rules.
[/ QUOTE ]
True, but there are ways of protesting that don't involve 'protesting' or angry rants. You could probably say just about anything to anyone depending on how you say it.
Then again, my personal goal is to be able to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip, even so far as spending all their frequent flyer miles. -
It was gone because it was about pigg files, period. Second post. That thread is stickied, it's there for anyone to read.
-
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Then we'll get the torches and pitchforks and head to Austin.
[/ QUOTE ]
I'm already here. I'll show you some great bars that we can all get liquored up in before the riots.
[/ QUOTE ]
Alright! You just can't have a good riot without getting liquored up first. -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Then we'll get the torches and pitchforks and head to Austin.
[/ QUOTE ]
The hiring post makes me think that he's in California, though.
I am confused.
[/ QUOTE ]
Dammit!
I always get Cryptic's HQ and NC's HQ confoozled...
So we'll appoint a navigator then head to... NC HQ! -
He's still finding his own groove. Heck, he posted a joke in Freedom's section recently, it was shocking... and a little scary. Also, even though Cricket took the reins for a bit, Lighthouse is still very much in Cuppa's shadow. Love her, hate her, whatever. But she has a way of getting her point across without mass smackage. And she won't not smack if it's needed.
Lighthouse just needs to find his own style here. We're an interesting community to join up. One person starts a thread asking why Statesman's in-game character is grouchy and Jack posts 'Because I'm grouchy'. There's an interesting synergy going on here between devs and players. Give Lighthouse a few more months to settle in.
Then we'll get the torches and pitchforks and head to Austin. -
<QR>
I'm still not finding this on youtube. What keywords were used?
Yes yes, I know... I'm being silly. Because I want to see it up on youtube. Now. Right now. Come on devs. Get to singing. -
-
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now we just need the COH staff to record a live version of this song, to be used in the special Winter Event Zone....
[/ QUOTE ]
Uh....You really don't want that level of sonic torture.
[/ QUOTE ]
Pretty please?
I won't pm any devs for a whole week if you do.
-
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hey!
I remembered you this time.
Don't I get a pat on the back or a cookie for that?
<.<
>.>
Or something leather?
[/ QUOTE ]
Wait... you usually forget about me?
[/ QUOTE ]
Who are you?
-
[ QUOTE ]
A pat on the backSIDE? WITH something leather?
Sorry, sometimes I just cant restrain myself.
[/ QUOTE ]
O.o
You... uhm... need help being restrained?