Golden Girl

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    25494
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    Which is all that needed to be said and this whole mess would have been avoided. If I'd read the patch notes and seen, I'd have stopped to look what this "alt-friendly" option is, discovered what it took and been mildly bemused before moving on to the other things I actually cared about. However, when I read "solo" in there, my reaction was more: "Hold the phone! Solo option? Like, for real? I gotta' see this!" Only it turned out it's like Top Cat's free soda at 10 cents a bottle.

    Seriously, if Marketing can avoid saying stupid things, we can avoid arguing about them on the forums, because no matter how stupid a thing shows up in official communication, SOMEONE will make it a point to defend it till the bitter end. Yet Marketing just couldn't resist, could they? Marketing, or whoever wrote that tripe.

    It's not even the change I mind, personally. Tradable merits, whatever. It's what it was called that pisses me off, because it's a lie.
    Actually, it is a more solo-friendly option - the devs seem to be giving the lowest priroity to players who refuse to team, which is only natural, as not only are they a tiny minority, but the whole Incarnate system is based around team play.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Eva Destruction View Post
    The official guide to the Keyes Reactor trial makes it sound like it has an opening cutscene too.
    I like the use of "admonishes" - it makes it sound like he's going to stand there and lecture us

    Quote:
    Either way, it does mean that the devs have heard many players' dislike of being forced to sit through overly long cutscenes and hopefully will lead to fewer and shorter cutscenes in the future.
    Or now that they have a skip feature, they might feel they can add more and longer ones
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by brynsul View Post
    Nice comic GG
    You're welcome - I'm working on a 2nd one right now too
  4. He showed up on Freedom server last night too
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
    My branch, for which I am the sole IT employee, pushes out $2 million worth of product every month. You have a server? Wonderful. I've got a few more than that.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TonyV View Post
    Do you really want to compare day job responsibilities? I'm pretty sure I have you beaten. $2 million is maybe one day's production at one of our smaller plants. My team is directly responsible for the vast majority of all of that equipment. I'm not exaggerating when I say that as I sit here typing this, there are literally over 2,700 Windows, AIX, Linux, Sun, Mainframe, and AS/400 servers within 200 feet of me in production service, and that I am watching monitoring tools that watch over literally billions--that's with a b--of software, services, and production activities.
    Boys and their silly size contests
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    I just hope the prices for these things aren't insane, such that I won't have to run, say, 50 Trials for one aura.
    I think you'll need to run multiple Trials to unlock all the parts - I don't think you'd be able to unlock the entire set of armor from the merits you get from just one Trial.
  7. Positron said in a recent inteview that they have to be careful not to create a path that's too easy, otherwse a lot of players will only ever take that option - which is why he said a conversion of normal merits into Threads would be unlikely, but a conversion of alignment merits into Threads might be possible.
    The trials are the main way of advancing as an Incarnate, which is why they also seem to be adding alternative methods only a little bit at a time, so they can see exactly how it affects the endgame system.
    They added Threads to the rewards for the Apex and Tin Mage TFs, then they made Notices and Favors of the Well be convertable into Threads - and now they'e adding Thread vouchers - there's a steady increase in new ways to access the Incarnate system - but you shouldn't expect anything big until they're totally sure they can add it without needing to nerf it in the future.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mirai View Post
    I do tend to wonder if the devs will ever be adding anything I'll be interested in someday.
    A new zone in I21?
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by UberRod View Post
    They are.
    I know
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Leo_G View Post
    If (nearly) every 50 is going to be wearing it, I really don't think I'd want to jump on that silly bandwagon >_>
    I wouldn't be seen dead wearing something that looked like that
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by IanTheM1 View Post
    And as usual the rabble out on the streets can starve, eh?
    As usual?
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Daemodand View Post
    I'm opposed to Closed Leagues. I'm in favor of Open Leagues. I'm in favor of a viable solo option, and until we have one, I am dependent on iTrials for my progress, and Closed Leagues retard or even stop that progress.
    You won't notice any difference - Leagues are all run as "closed" Leagues right now
  13. I missed the bit where they said this is the only solo path they'll ever add
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mr_Grey View Post
    I'm hoping that the future has more options available to players to unlock these things
    Check out the I20.5 overview page
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane View Post
    Well, Lambda is much more griefable, and that's part of why it gets played less than the BAF.
    Actually, it's very hard to grief the Lambda Trial, unless there are multiple griefers.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
    Did a dev actually call it that?
    No
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by IanTheM1 View Post
    it has multiple phases and mechanics that look extremely griefable.
    If only they'd let us set up private Leagues.
  18. They did say they were looking at the idea of Incarnate arcs, so this might be an in between stage while they're working on them.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by IanTheM1 View Post
    I beg to differ.
    You can try arguing with the game if you like, but there's only ever going to be one winner
  20. You're not an Incarnate untill the game says you are
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by IanTheM1 View Post
    I too can make arbitrary arguments. I forbid you from wearing the Incarnate armor because your name starts with G.

    Also let's make it so you're not allowed to use tech costume pieces unless you're tech origin.
    Anyone can make a tech item - but maybe Incarnate armor can only be made or worn by people who have links to the Well
  22. I do like hte "utter annihilation" bit
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    Having to wait till level 35 was bad enough for any char wanting to use Roman parts (and previously Vanguard)

    Waiting till 50? Sorry, calling bollocks on that one.
    But this is Incarnate armor - you wouldn't be able to use it unless you were an Incarnate
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Vanden View Post
    They don't vary that much.
    It's still enough