Xanatos

Renowned
  • Posts

    2017
  • Joined

  1. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Don't be silly Shecky. Those threads are all either community building & relevant to the members of the server, or are one-off threads that are not created on a daily basis.

    The Rookey being a spamfest isn't a problem. The Rookery being a DAILY spamfest is a problem. All that the Virtue Liberation Front () is fighting for is to have it all consolidated in one thread.
  2. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fedor View Post
    That is only your interpetation of the rule. The Rookery is a different topic every day and does not include the same text. The Mods have reviewed the subject and decided that your intepretation is incorrect.
    I doubt very much that the mods have reviewed it.

    Could you please tell me what Todays topic is please. I was not able to find a topic from the "Rookery: Not Quite Friday" thread.

    Thanks.
  3. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fedor View Post
    That's all well and good of you to say xan, but I don't believe you. Not even for a second.
    You can quote me on it anytime I complain in the future. You have the ultimate ace in the hole if I ever moan about the Rookery if it ever does become consolidated in one thread.

    Quote:
    5. Non-Constructive posts are prohibited.

    Spam - this is considered to be repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users.
    Highlighted parts.

    Repetitive Posts = daily threads.
    Have no substance = sillyness incarnate.

    The Rookery does go against the forum rules.
  4. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fedor View Post
    There is no reason to just have a single thread, if there was the people complaining would complain about that as well. They just want to gripe and the Rookery is the target at the moment.
    I would not complain if there was one thread.
  5. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    In all seriousness, and without meaning to victimise anyone, I would like to know why The Rookery can't be consolidated into one thread?

    Would the functionality of the Rookery be inhibited in any way if it was consolidated into one thread?
  6. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Haetron View Post
    Careful Xan. Motivating others is close to Lobbying, you'll get a nasty PM.
    Well as long as i get a response to my first PM I won't mind that much. And to paraphrase what i meant:

    "I would be interested in hearing what the anonymous people who are gving me green rep have to say about this. Do not be shy. I would like to hear your opinions."
  7. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    SILENT MAJORITY...ASSEMBLE!

    plz
  8. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Merry_Mint View Post
    When I ask you guys to stop being antagonistic, petty jerks, I'm not being a hypocrite. The Rookery's fun is victimless, but yours is at the expense of the Rookery. Who thought these were even remotely comparable?
    There's no bitterness on my end. I thought the Rookery's posters were a laid back relaxed bunch and could handle some tongue-in-cheek banter. Cien_Fugos gave me positive rep for the rookery thread I started on Sunday. He must have thought it was funny.

    *shrugs*

    If I had to sit down and actually think about it...i'd probably say that you can't spam the forums with daily fluff threads and not expect people to get annoyed. Not only that...but what have they ACTUALLY got to do with the Virtue Server or City of Heroes?
  9. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rookery. View Post
    /e bounces in and noms on a pamcake.

    Good Mor......

    Wait.....this place looks different than before.... no chefbots, just a guy in a dirty tshirt making hashbrowns ... no shining happy people...and the cookies, the cookies are all FROZEN!!!!!

    NUUUUUUU!!!!

    Why all you people got knives out all of a sudden?

    >.>

    /e flees.
    KILL IT WITH FIRE!

    /em huggles
  10. 0.93, If I turn on tough then i'm at 1.26 end drain.
  11. Is consume enough by itself? Even with 150% recharge it's only up once per minute / 45 seconds.
  12. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    What are you talking about? *giggles*
  13. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Yay cookies!

    Nom nom nom.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BitStyle View Post
    It will override the current MA sk system.
    Dammnit.

    My prediction - everyone will farm level 54 Liutenants in AE. They will be +5 to the SK's level.

    Fortunately this won't affect influence farmers at all.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Chaos_Creator View Post
    I boss farm with luck inspirations. That way I get the best of everything.
    Yeah I do that with my friends Willpower Brute. Seeing as three aggro-cap groups + clicky hits the ticket cap...I'm wondering if I might just do the same with my FA. Only issue is that I'll need to pop endurance insps in order to keep the toggles running. So having defense handled by something already in the build would be useful.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ShadowNate View Post
    =\ every mission in the game will be auto sk/mal. MA inclueded.
    So will the auto-SK feature override it or will it be removed from the game completely?
  17. Does this mean that the auto-sk feature in the Mission Architect is going to be removed?
  18. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    Nobody wants my cookies?
  19. Thanks for responding. Am I right in thinking that the most important thing for a /FA is to have perma hasten / 150% recharge? Even at the expense of damage, defense, and resistance?

    I have a hard time agreeing with the idea that a character with Healing Flames recharging in 12 seconds with negligible defense is superior to a build with Healing Flames recharging in 13.7 seconds with 45% defense. Surely the 2 second difference won't matter at all, especially considering that the character with 45% defens will be getting hit 90% less. (Thus removing the dependence on Healing Flames by a significant margin.)
  20. Xanatos

    Hi guys!

    OMFG HAI! How are you Haety?

    *bakes cookies*
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Chaos_Creator View Post
    I gave you my suggestion. Don't build for defense build for recharge.
    How much recharge would you say is enough? I'm currently on 110%.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA View Post
    Silas, Chaos_Creator, do either of you have better builds or know where I can find one?
    Typical. People criticise a build but don't offer suggestions for improvement / replacement.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sardan View Post
    Yeah, it's key to get an enemy that won't unload a big attack chain on you while you're resting. CoT Guides are good, but as their attack seemed to be awfully near 50% of my health, I was concerned that if 2 of them hit me at the same time they might kill me. A CoT Ice Thorn also has only one melee attack and it hits for a bit less damage than the Guide. When they both hit at the same time, it'd take me way down into the danger zone, but I was able to safely regen.
    I must be doing something wrong. I had a level 51 Guide & a level 51 Ice Thorn hitting my resting brute. (Who had a generic heal IO in rest.) And they eventually killed him.

    Hmm...