Herr_Salmon

[ QUOTE ]
@Fire Hazard

[/ QUOTE ]

@Ice Hazard-2 = @Fire Hazard

>.>

Someone's drunk on our vent every night.

In the past it's just been Omega, but now it floats around from person to person.

JC is my baby's daddy.

h0j, you're gonna get [censored] at for that one... don't you remember Omega's catgirl avatar with the bouncy bounce?

@OmegaEquinox = @HUGE PvPness

But he's out for the entire month, so that's fairly irrelevant.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Don't worry about Psypunk. He's just giddy that he has 8 people in the arena to make him look good. Let him be happy while it lasts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Too bad you don't have 8 people to make you look good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Listen, if you still think this is actually Chinook posting you're as dumb as you come off.

[ QUOTE ]
ok...........although I'm puzzled why you chose to disregard the rules you set yourself for the round robin, its all academic at this point.

Looking forward to our match with JAL.

[/ QUOTE ]

You've obviously never had a discussion (screaming match) with TGIA.

Don't worry about Psypunk. He's just giddy that he has 8 people in the arena to make him look good. Let him be happy while it lasts.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Will you nerds give it a rest? lol

Who the hell cares? FOL has two matches coming up against OS and JAL, that is the point of the ladder.

The ESK and JAL match was listed and agreed upon and many of you were online and commenting in the Arena chat channel at the time. This is not a situation where we had no contact with them and they had no contact with us. A match was agreed upon and listed...hence, an official match was conducted between ESK and JAL and it resulted in a win for JAL due to forfeiture.

There are no shenanigans going on here and "if" JAL had actually won the match with ESK by competition instead of forfeiture, the percentage of our "margin of victory" would've been even higher, thereby further cementing our place in the number one ranking! lol

"If" ESK had not agreed to a match and a match was not officially listed, then TGIA's rules would've applied. That is not the case.

Less bellyaching and more matches...all I read on these forums from a particular SG is bellyaching and excuses for losing like "boohoo, we're being spawn camped and that's why we lose", lol.

Sorry you didn't like the outcome of the tourney, my heart breaks for you. Now, dry it up, and we'll see FOL a week from Tuesday.

GG

[/ QUOTE ]

ok...a few things here.

1- We beat you, so we don't need to make any excuses about losing. If you ended being awarded the top spot for running up scores vs new groups doesn't take away that we beat you in the head to head.

2-The forfeiture clause is for matches AFTER the initial round robin was done. TGIA had explicitly stated that if you didnt fight a group during the 2 designated dates (Sunday and Wednesday) that both teams would be assigned a loss. The round robin was to be considered separate from the ladder, and rules were stated very clearly for each one.

3- Its not JAL, nor FoL that should had finished ranked first. OS was 5-1 same as us, and they had a bigger score differential than us, thus OS should had been awarded the top rank.

I'm sorry if going by the rules sounds like bellyaching to you, but it is what it is, and not matter how much you try to paint it as like you don't care, the fact of the matter is that you do care enough to go making glorious postings on the news section in your website frontpage.

I have a lot of respect for your group, and I have no doubt that JAL is one of the top groups in the game. As such, it is in YOUR best interest to win that top spot by your own merits, rather than fishing for a cheesy technicallity that doesn't even apply.

We'll still pursue the matches and earn our spot on the field.

See ya then.............that is, if you actually get to play on the lineup.

[/ QUOTE ]

The only time I've ever seen a storm team do -worse- than the run and gun is when JAL plays Psy on his stormie.

lol, h0j and Myk on /ac.

www.unleashthefury.com

Good thing I was in ABH for like a week and a half 5-6 months ago. Maybe more than that. Lacuna, Mags and Omega were, by far and away, the top 3 players in ABH.

ABH is the only PvPSG on Infinity, so those who want to PvP join ABH or don't PvP at all, which was not the case for DA, or so I'm lead to believe.

[ QUOTE ]

I find this very ironic considering that on the one and only official match that FoL had vs Velocity we brought over a jump team, which Velocity defeated using a storm team.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wasn't with Velocity then, could care less.

[ QUOTE ]
Another thing..........boasting about scores of practice/scrimage rounds in which you are facing non optimal lineups is a bit tasteless. Don't become Cruel part II.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not really boasting so much as saying that FoL isn't unbeatable like Incursion is implying.

[ QUOTE ]
If you really think you're better than us, or NDX, or whomever, why is it that you guys avoid scheduling official matches like the plague?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not my decision to make, but it may have something to do with the fact that they picked up a bunch of new people and would like to get practices with them in.

Might also have something to do with the only matches I've been around to see be requested were done out of dislike for the group. NDX called us out for prestacking venge (once in a practice match just to see what was up), so they wanted an official. Now you're calling us out for using venge at all, and saying that's the only way we win, so you want an official.

Word of advice, people might be a tad bit more inclined to play with you if you didn't call them out when a win or loss on either side would only add to the drama.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
GL HF with this thread. It's a lost [censored] cause. Anti-Venge groups are the ones that [censored] suck at it, just like anti-storm groups are the ones that can win without it.

[/ QUOTE ]

so if you're anti-vengeance it's 'cuz you suck...

and if you're anti-storm it's 'cuz you're sweet?

'scuse me while i laugh in your face.

BWAAAHAAAAHAAAA!

[/ QUOTE ]


gg context and reading comprehension. The only reason you'd be an advocate of something as corny as a Storm team is because it's your best bet of winning, just like the only reason you'd be an advocate of using Venge while it's still bugged is because your group is good at stacking it. The opposite is also true. GJ Being a tool.

[ QUOTE ]
We have delt with it our answer is the storm. We practice against the storm with our own jump team and found its a great match. You guys want a match vs us then lets do it keep the practice crap out of it. From what I saw was your vengeance motivated team kick a non vengeance motivated teams butt. I also saw when you guys cant get vengeance you frankly have no concentraded fire what so ever. Lets stop talking and do a match you have your play style we have ours, vengeance or no vengance your choice!!!! Lets just do this and see how much you got to say after it..

[/ QUOTE ]

MIGHT MAKES RIGHT, ZEIG HIEL!

[ QUOTE ]

I'm more or less of the opinion that, yes, I'd like to see the bug fixed, but as long as it isn't, we're going to keep practicing the way we were. Unless you explicitly forbid veng in a match, there's no way to regulate its use and no reason to expect your opponent wont be using it against you.

Everyone can keep crying about veng stacking all they want, but until the Devs fix it, we either deal with it as is or forbid its use completely. There's no other answer.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly.

GL HF with this thread. It's a lost [censored] cause. Anti-Venge groups are the ones that [censored] suck at it, just like anti-storm groups are the ones that can win without it.

92-6, actually.

[ QUOTE ]
we [censored] rolled you all last night with the Storms

[/ QUOTE ]

K. You beat a run and gun team with a storm team. Grats, I suppose.


Hey guys, I beat this AR/Dev blaster with an Ice/EM tank! I'm so [censored] amazing.

[ QUOTE ]
your sure do a lot of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

your sure do type much goodly, yo.

Seriously though, I was mocking him.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

It is universal. Your comparisons of veng and storms teams are apples and oranges in my opinion.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good thing I wasn't comparing them

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe i read what you wrote wrong, so please correct me if im mistaken.

You said that the general direction of the thread was veng=easy mode, storm teams are fine?

I read that as you implied storm teams are equally considered as easy mode. Thus comparing one to the other. If that was simply a question that storm teams are fine for the match...than i stand corrected. But then again, why mention storm teams in a thread about vengeance to begin with

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I was just saying that since the start of the thread, it's become z0mg Venge = EZMoedlolololol, and all the freaks are in agreement that Storm = difficult to win with, and fun to play against.


I also [censored] love how nobody got on LD or NDX about Venge stacking like the Freaks are on us now, just because we've rolled their run and gun team hardcore the last night or two.

[ QUOTE ]
I love how all the non-storm players consider storm teams the same Easy-mode that venge stacking is.

[/ QUOTE ]

I love how all the groups that aren't good at stacking venge consider venge the Easy-mode that Storm teams are.

[ QUOTE ]
Bring your storm team. I'm dying to see how it'll fare vs ours.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, that sounds like fun.[/sarcasm]

If it came down to a Storm team vs Storm team, I'd rather have both groups agree not to use them.

Either that or I'd rather not play. Storm v Storm is [censored] stupid imo.

[ QUOTE ]

It is universal. Your comparisons of veng and storms teams are apples and oranges in my opinion.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good thing I wasn't comparing them

So wait, the general direction of this thread is that Venge = easymode, but storm teams are fine?


LOLOLLOLLOLOLLOLOLLOLOLLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLLOLLOLOLLOOO LOLOLLOLOLOLLOLLOL