-
Posts
83 -
Joined
-
-
Quote:SSA 1: Partial success for Wade. He learned a little more about the functioning of the Obelisk.There is a very fine line between a Xanatos Gambit and a Villain Sue, and Darren Wade has super-leaped across it.
SSA 2: Partial success for Wade. He learned a little more about the functioning of the Obelisk and got some artifacts on his way out.
SSA 3: Almost complete success for Wade. I can't think of any way it could have gone much better for him.
SSA 4: Hard to say. I'll call this one a partial success for Wade. It's not entirely clear if he wanted to Malaise to fail or if this was his fallback plan. I don't agree with the Xanatos criticisms here on the forum (and they're a big reason why I delurked after so long), but I do think it's unrealistic (in this world of jet-powered apes and time travel) that he could have predicted the one specific action of absorbing the Dirge of Chaos.
SSA 5: Almost complete success for Wade. His plan to kill Statesman and steal his powers was an unqualified success, but he fails to kill the PC.
SSA 6: Apparently another ambiguous victory but... Tyrka/AB is on the loose and gunning for him and Wade again failed to kill the PC and there may be well more going on than we know. The seeds of his defeat have probably been planted here, even though he seems to get everything he wants. I'm going to withhold judgement until we get the last one.
So, by my reckoning, two partial wins, two clear wins, and two too close to call. -
It's funny that I wound up defending the SSAs as much as I did in this thread, because I really feel that the third mission of the sixth arc was one of the most painfully unenjoyable experiences I've had with the game in over seven years of playing it.
-
Quote:I believe that is demonstrably untrue. For every point I made, I have provided quotes from the appropriate source. When I had to speculate, I showed my reasoning. When I disagree with you, I explain why.Doctor Minerva,
I'm going to say this one last time. You don't refute anything with facts, you put up supposition and theory without basis and you argue motivation solely on speculation.
I'm sorry that you're taking this personally, but I don't feel you've supported your claims. I've addressed this at length.
If my responses are at times vague, it's because your criticisms to my responses are sweeping and you haven't made it clear what you mean when you say something like: "At this point your arguments barely hold together under their own construction let alone continuous logic." That tells me that you don't agree with what I've put forward, but it doesn't tell me why you think that.
I didn't intend my parting comment to be facetious. We clearly do have differing interpretations.
The exchange grew out of the question of why another group didn't rediscover the ritual before Darren Wade. Since his Midnighter connections were integral, I didn't address that, as I still consider him more or less a Midnighter. -
This is a bit of a lengthy reply, but you did accuse me of "cherry-picking" the points I addressed. That was done mostly to avoid a huge post like this, but I'm not going to truncate as I did before in the interest of completeness.
OZ: Oh come on! Seriously? You come out and say I'm interpreting facts and what do you do? YOU SPECULATE in the same manner you accuse me of doing! You're not even trying to debate a point here, you're deliberately being argumentative and speculative without anything to support your argument. I cited the direct points from the story and what was said without assumption. Unless you are then going to argue that I shouldn't take what's being said at face value for interpretation's sake?
Reply: No. I'm afraid that's not what you did. I don't see any other way to read your statement: "The problem is that his dialogue, his mannerisms and his approach speaks of a calm and collected individual. Right there you have someone who's level-headed and capable of assessing a situation" other than to say that you are giving me your interpretation of what you saw. It might be right, it might be wrong, but it's not an unbiased account of what occurred.
Quoted Minerva: It's not unreasonable to assume that he would know that Wade is an ex-Midnighter, but presumably some of Stateman's information gathering involved busting heads in Wade's stomping grounds and if Wade was as fastidious as he was with his other prep work, he would have at least had some influence over the information that did get to Statesman. This is speculation on my part, but I don't think it's altogether unreasonable.
I don't think we can connect him to any rituals at this point. (From the sound effect, Alexis was executed by a gunshot. Wade needed her blood and there were the candles and the accessories that go along with a ritual, but I don't think there was one actually performed.) Statesman certainly can't, We don't know how much he knows, but one thing we do know for certain is that even by the end of WWD 4, Statesman didn't know who was behind everything.
("Numina: Statesman is going to go straight for Wade, when he finds out he's behind all of this.")
OZ: I'm sorry, but you just proved the opposite.
Reply: Perhaps I was unclear, so to clarify, Statesman vanished somewhere between WWD 3 and WWD 4. Miss Liberty says he took off to clear his head after Ms. Liberty's funeral. At the end of WWD 4, Positron states that Statesman is still incommunicado. Numina states that Statesman does not at this point know that Wade was behind things, but he will go directly to him when he learns this.
OZ: Statesman is going to go straight for Wade when he finds out he's behind all of this, which is what he does. How else does he know where to go to confront him? How else does he know to call him by name?
We don't know. We know that Statesman is not in Paragon, otherwise the Phalanx would have seen him. If he's looking for Wade, the logical place to start would be the Rogue Isles. This is in fact, speculation, but I do think it's a pretty reasonable on that doesn't require a lot of assumptions.
OZ: Are you seriously putting up a strawman argument just to argue at this point? Every time you say something isn't so, you then add something that says it is. This isn't speculation, this isn't wild rampant unfounded guesswork, this is what is on screen, in text. And then, and THEN, you speculate, unfounded, with absolutely no evidence to support you, that Wade engineers the gathering of said information.
Reply: We hear about Statesman looking for Wade, and then, in the next arc, we have Statesman finding him. "Engineers" might be overstating it, but if his plan depended on Statesman finding him, then I do think he would have left some clues pointing in that direction. I don't think it matters that much though.
Quoted Minerva: Okay, I'll bite. Who else would research (the Incarnate killing ritual)? Access to Cimerora seems to be integral, so that eliminates everyone but, who? The Fifth Column, Malta, and kinda sorta Ghost Widow? With that in mind, I don't think its at all that unreasonable that nobody has done this before.
OZ: Are you being truly disingenuous here? The Circle of Thorns ring any bells? Those guys who live under the city and practice arcane and ancient rituals going back thousands of years? The Mu? The Midnighters? How many magical factions with established long histories would you like me to cite here that have every reasonable ability and resource to do this?
Again, you're basing your entire supposition about Wade on the notion that 'noone has done this before' when it's clear that they have. Wade's information is based on something that happened a thousand years ago. This is not his original work. This is not his original ritual. SOMEONE ELSE DID IT. Which means entirely reasonably that someone else could have that information.
Reply: They don't have any presence in Cimerora, though. He rediscovered Sister Airlia's ritual, which does imply a connection to Cimerora as a starting point, which is something those other mystical groups lack.
Quoted Minerva: I don't think he would know that (Wade tried to Steal Synapse's powers) either. A ghost, a Lost and some igneous (walk into a bar) teamed up, they did steal Synapse's power for a while, but then their obelisk blew up and it seemed to be the end of it. Even if you happen to know that Wade exists at this point, there's nothing to connect him to this if you don't have knowledge of the cut scene. If you look at the clues that pop up in your window, you'll see that that the image of a distant land is not the scene in the Rogue Isles, but rather:
Look at the high level red side arcs. It's pretty rare when you don't kick the stuffing out of a Freedom Phalanx member. I don't think that Synapse's situation would set off any alarm bells. It's just the kind of thing that happens from time to time.
Oz: OH COME ON. This is getting beyond facetious. You're not even using any supported facts or anything now, you're just saying 'it's the kind of thing that happens from time to time' and that is your defence of that point?
Reply: I didn't list the specific arcs, but can we accept as given that in the plurality of redside arcs above level 35 or so, you're probably going to be beating on a name brand hero for the final mission, be they a Vindicator or Phalanxer? That was my point, and I'm sorry if it was unclear. So the attack on Synapse is not in itself unusual.
Oz: I wasn't even referring to the player character, I'm referring to Statesman. You're very conveniently avoiding the point and the assertion and trying to make another which fits the interpretation that you personally want to attribute to it without once, and I have given you every opportunity and even have gone so far as to put forward a supported argument, doing the same. Not once.
Reply: I thought I made it clear, but to make it explicit, I would sum up my argument as, "Statesman did not act unreasonably when confronting Darren Wade."
Oz: You're even arguing that despite the fact that Statesman turns up, knowing who Wade is and what he's done and somehow doesn't know from either conferring with Synapse or the player character or even the Midnighters (which are all totally reasonable given the situation of the attacks) is reasonable? Does this entire situation happen in a vacuum? Does this happen in some way that the characters involved are totally unaware (considering there is media coverage from the redside arcs) of events transpiring around them?
Reply: What would Synapse tell him? "One of the Lost stole my powers, but then a hero showed up and beat him up and an obelisk blew up and I got them back?"
What would the Midnighters tell him? They don't know he was behind events until WWD 4, by which time Statesman was incommunicado.
Quoted Minerva: I think you're attributing too much knowledge to Statesman here. What can we prove that he knows? He knows that Wade was absolutely involved in the death of Ms. Liberty. That's it. It's possible, even probably that he knows more, but keep in mind that his main goal was finding his daughter's murderer. Delving into his past was secondary.
Did Wade present himself as a two-bit dabbler who bungled a ritual, got scared and executed the sacrifice in a panic, then fled to Cimerora, perhaps to tap some hidden reservoir of power? Possibly. There's no evidence for this, but there's no evidence against it either, which actually puts it one up on the theory where he was "goading" Statesman into a confrontation, as he's very clearly running from him in prior to springing the trap.
Oz: I'm seriously done with this. You keep pulling out this strawman argument along with doing precisely what you accuse me of doing, which is randomly speculating as to what the character is doing.
Reply: That bit was kind of a joke, and I apologize for not making that clear.
Oz: 'Delving into his past was secondary?' HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS? Give me PROOF. Give me supporting evidence in the text that supports this theory. I gave mine. PONY UP.
Reply: Numina does say that Statesman will go directly for Wade and the Phalanx seems to accept this. But really, he's not going to stop for a background check and an interview with Wade's kindergarten teacher once he knows he's got the location.
Quoted Minerva: Where? (Wade) provides some token assistance in the Midnighter Club and that's the first, last and only time we see him do anything until that scene on the mountaintop.
Oz: So based on that, he's not involved. At all. Is that what you're saying?
No. You didn't quote the section to which I was replying. You said, "Wade is demonstrably proving he's got more power than previously known" and I was disputing that.
Oz: Minerva, I've argued better topics with high school students. For every supposed point you put forward, you either contradict yourself or actively avoid and cherry pick what you think you can actively argue either because you can't, or because you think some alternative avenue will prove you right.
Reply: I didn't mean to cherry pick, but I do believe you are proceeding from a flawed premise, and if there was anything I didn't address, it was because I thought that I had addressed the arguments underlaying it already.
Oz: I refute you and counter-argue and all I get is this waffle that you don't quote, you don't support and most importantly, you assume and grossly so to try and prove your point. You make assumptions based on nothing that we see occur and argue that is somehow a salient and relevant point. I have, and would continue (but I see now it's becoming pointless) on what's seen and follow that through to a logical and consistent conclusion.
You choose to not do and even just actively dodge and weave without any supportive evidence. Unless you want to pony up as I said before, then I'm really seriously done talking to you.
Reply: I, of course, have a different interpretation of our exchange. -
Quote:This is already an interpretation of events. It's not an unreasonable interpretation, mind, but you are speculating about his mental state, and proceeding from the assumption that your interpretations are correct, rather than reporting what we can see.Nope. What I'm arguing for is reasonable suspension of disbelief. Reasonable suspension of disbelief is to say 'Statesman is overwrought over losing his daughter and he's not thinking straight so he falls into the trap'. The problem is that his dialogue, his mannerisms and his approach speaks of a calm and collected individual. Right there you have someone who's level-headed and capable of assessing a situation.
Maybe he's as cool and collected as he seems, and his level words are an accurate reflection of that. Maybe he's just got his game face on. Maybe he's someone who is fighting down the urge to kill his daughter's murderer and it's taking all of Zeus's willpower to resist giving in. We don't know.
Quote:Hold on, let's go back a step. If you have someone's name, you presumably therefore know something about them. It can't be just plucked randomly from the air and then presumptively know how to find them. So therefore by that process alone, Statesman knows what Wade's deal is.
Quote:Bearing in mind that by that very same logic anyone should be asking how Wade got his hands on the information and rituals he does,
("Numina: Statesman is going to go straight for Wade, when he finds out he's behind all of this.")
Quote:given that there are entire cults that are thousands of years old that are dedicated to this kind of research.
Quote:So let's look at that: Statesman knows Wade tried to steal Synapse's powers.
Quote:Originally Posted by Exploding ObeliskWhen the obelisk was shattered, it forced several images into your mind. One of a temple at the top of a small mountain. Another of a ghostly looking woman, conversing with a man in armor. The final shows the two shaking hands, the man in armor's face looking grim, but determined.
Quote:He knows that it's done with magic that steals powers. He knows that Wade is a small-time mage playing with big-time powers. And now he knows that Wade is goading him to come after him on Cimerora, where his own past incarnation once lived, and is therefore presumably a seat of Incarnate energy, past or present.
Did Wade present himself as a two-bit dabbler who bungled a ritual, got scared and executed the sacrifice in a panic, then fled to Cimerora, perhaps to tap some hidden reservoir of power? Possibly. There's no evidence for this, but there's no evidence against it either, which actually puts it one up on the theory where he was "goading" Statesman into a confrontation, as he's very clearly running from him in prior to springing the trap.
Quote:It's not hard to have two and two add up to be four at that point. That isn't conjuring a solution, that's not giving the character knowledge they don't have, everything I just wrote is present in the story. At the very least, Statesman should be cautious. Wade is demonstrably proving he's got more power than previously known. -
-
Quote:Statesman had been around a long time, and was invulnerable enough to survive choosing A for most of that time. Also, if you look at the cut scene, there's essentially no gap between Statesman finding him and Wade springing the trap. He really only does the boasting once he has Statesman at his mercy.When a soldier pops out of cover and points a funny looking club at your up-till-now invincible tank do you a> laugh as you slowly rotate your turret to bring the main gun to bear on the nicely stationary and exposed target or b> think that there is now an anti-invincible-tank weapon and one is being pointed at your tank and eliminate the threat whatever the most expedient method is?
The ones who choose "a" probably never lived long enough to get to make another choice and States has, had, been around a long time.
Go go gadget idiotball is all I can say.
As someone said in another thread, Wade had a good day and States had a bad day and they happened to be the same day. -
Quote:No. I'm saying that the characterization of Statesman has not been consistent enough to give us enough information to make a reliable prediction about how he would act in a given situation. I'm not saying that it was inevitable that his confrontation would have occurred as it did, but you seem to be arguing that it was impossible that it could have happened as it did.So your entire defense of the story to date is that in your reasoning Statesman has been inconsistently characterised, this is entirely reasonable and logical to have happen?
Quote:And you're assuming (without any evidence, I note) that Statesman doesn't know who Wade is when he calls him by name before the trap is sprung.
I'm not saying that Statesman didn't suspect a trap. I'm saying that he's got 80+ years of surviving traps, and he had no reason to believe this would be any different. It wasn't stupid of him, he wasn't overconfident. When I'm hunting Skulls for the badge on a level 50, I don't feel the need to pop two purples and my tier 9 before each group. And if I should accidentally aggro the Kraken in the process, I'm pretty sure I could flee.
Same deal here. Statesman might have suspected that Wade had something up his sleeve, but he's survived an awful lot, and it's not a reasonable assumption that this non-entity would be able to lock him down and shut him off at will.
It's a writer's job to tell a story. I do think it's outside the scope of a writer's mission to why things didn't happen. I'd certainly agree that a little more explanation about why certain courses of actions were not pursued would have helped the verisimilitude of the arc, but you're never going to have a completely exhaustive list that will satisfy a fan base as dedicated as the one we have here. -
Quote:I hate you for making me do this stupid arc again, but I was so intrigued by your theory that I felt compelled to do it.Here's a wrinkle to the Mind Riding angle for getting OUT of this situation.
This is very much open to interpretation. Analyze the cutscene in SSA 6 Mission 3 very carefully and you'll notice something very interesting. As Samuraiko pointed out, the Word Balloons are color coded "correctly" to indicate exactly *WHO* is talking at all times. But here's the key thing everyone might be missing.
AT NO POINT after Sister Psyche *screams* out JUSTIN! does Manticore say a single word. And Manticore had just been very emphatically saying (people's opinions in this thread to the contrary) that *HE* would not KILL her. And if you closely watch his body language (great job on the emoting here, Devs!), it is *possible* that it wasn't Manticore at all who "shot" Sister Psyche ... but rather Sister Psyche herself, Mind Riding Manticore, who "did the deed" to pull the bow and shoot the arrow.
And watching it again, I think you're on to something...
Quote:You're told by your mission contact that Darrin Wade "now has Sister Psyche's powers" ... without even giving the slightest indication of HOW this was accomplished or even that this has in some way been DEMONSTRATED AND PROVEN by events elsewhere (in the less than a minute it takes you to travel back to your contact after exiting the mission). -
They do make it clear from the very beginning of the arc that time is running out, ("Hey, Jen Sunlight, glad to see you're here. We've got a major situation that we need your help in handling. Sister Psyche's condition is getting worse by the minute...."), so I assumed that whole arc took place in a very short span of game time and the Midnighters weren't able to get there until after it was all over.
-
Quote:That's how I interpreted it.It looked to me like he was "struggling" aplenty when he was caught in that Beam Of Light ... but that it wasn't doing him any good. I interpreted that whole sequence as being once he made the FATAL MISTAKE he was completely outmaneuvered and left with no remaining options. He then had a This Was Your Life epiphany in his final moments as his life was burned right out of him, and "accepted" his Final Defeat gracefully rather than dying in an agonizing scream of helplessness ... because the ideals and principles he lived for, fought for, and ultimately died for, were bigger than himself ... and would be carried on by others.
I think of the Lion in Winter, a movie about Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine. All courtly intrigue and Katherine Hepburn and Peter O'Toole chewing the scenery. There is a scene when the princes are locked in the dungeons and they believe the king, their father is coming to execute them. One of them tells the others that he won't see them beg for their lives, and he gets the response, "You fool! As if it matters how a man falls down" to which he answers, "When the fall is all that's left, it matters a great deal."
The impression I get from Wade's dialogue is that Statesman's powers had already been drained at this point, and he was just a normal man. And that's when you gather as much humor and dignity as you can, and face your death with whatever you've got. -
Quote:I don't believe it is. I think the salient point is not that he's encountered magical means to end his life more than once, but that he's survived them.It's not an article of faith whatsoever. You have clear and present precedent where the Statesman character has encountered magical means to end his life more than once, he also knows that Wade is baiting him, and most importantly, he has a wealth of superheroing experience. To argue that Statesman's behavior in that situation is consistent with the above is as equally disingenuous.
Statesman's characterization has been all over the place in the eight years of the franchise, and I don't think he's ever been portrayed as a particularly subtle thinker. (Wasn't he the guy who knocked down two Rikti dropships over residential zones before he figured out he wanted to do it over the river?) It seems unlikely that he would have been aware of the events of WWD#4, since he was probably off looking for the punk who killed his daughter. There's not a lot to tie the events of the arc together at this point and it's not unreasonable to assume that it looked like an isolated incident. I would think that he would have expected a trap, just not a trap capable of killing him from some punk he'd never heard of prior to a week ago.
Quote:It frankly borders on the naive. This isn't an entitlement argument, it's not even arguing as a veteran player. It's an argument about Storytelling 101, which has simple and straightforward rules, foremost amongst which is consistency of characterisation. If you establish things about a character (ie Superman is honest, Batman plans for everything), -
Quote:I think the best way to think of the Joker's (and to a lesser extent, Wade's) plan is to look at the American Penal code. It recognizes four levels of culpability, "purposely", "knowingly," "recklessly", and "negligently". I'm going to focus on "knowingly".I think you hit the nail on the head there though, Arcana....it's possible but not likely that his plan has contingencies. But seriously, for the sake of credibility and just internal story consistency, the only way his plan works is because the story says it does.
When I first started my education, my professor described "knowingly" as just shooting randomly into the crowd without aiming at anyone in particular. You don't have specific intent to harm any given individual in that crowd, but hurting someone is almost assured.
With the Joker, he wasn't aiming for anything in particular. He was "knowingly" causing havoc. He just threw a whole bunch of stuff against the wall and saw what stuck and he was happy with whatever outcome as long as people were getting hurt. Wade has a more rigorous framework to his plan, and he's managed to set up the situation that he manages to benefit from any of the most probable outcomes. We're probably looking at the close to the optimal outcome for Wade with the way the story went, but things could have gone differently, and he would have derived less benefit from them, but as Arcanaville said, normal people can plan meticulously for much less benefit.
Quote:Statesman dies not because he has an amazing plan, but because, as was stated ad infinitum, he somehow loses the power of common sense and walks into an obvious trap even the most neophyte hero could see coming.
I also think it's disingenuous to make an argument like this in the same thread that so savagely pillories Manticore for not mezzing SP to drop her toggles. -
She would have done it, but she got faceplanted from splash damage on that one mission where you rescue her from the Vanguard Sword.
-
I think options were pretty narrow at that point. If the ritual wasn't the only option it was certainly the best, and it would absolutely make sense to take it into account.
-
I'm not clear on what you think needs to be handwaved here. Wade wasn't being omniscient. He was simply taking a precaution so logical that its omission would have been questionable.
-
-
I'm just saying that I don't think this is the case here, though. Sister Psyche has a very specific problem with only one solution. Wade was the cause of the problem, so it's not unreasonable to assume that he knows what the solution would be too, and he's had the time and the opportunity to work his sabotage well in advance. It's not like he was able to predict what we'd do from any number of possible answers. If we wanted to heal Psyche, we had to perform the ritual.
-
I didn't feel it was particularly egregious, but rather a reasonable precaution. He's had a great deal of time to plan, and he understands what has been done to Sister Psyche and he knows what has to be done to cure it, so it just makes sense for him to account for that.
-
I continue to like the way the story is progressing, but the gameplay was terrible and almost entirely filler.
Mission One: You learn of a ritual that can help Sister Psyche, and you go to beat up a bunch of Carnies. Pretty standard mission here. You find Penny Yin, who was indeed the hero about whom everyone was speculating in the funeral picture. You rescue her and she tags along. She seemed to hold her own and she's a potent ally if you're running a more support oriented character.
You get to the end of the building and find Vanessa DeVore. Just when you're talking to her, Malta attacks. I think it's four waves of ambushes and it's much better than the alignment mission with Frostfire where Malta attacks, because each wave seems to be triggered by the defeat of the preceding one.
If I had one complaint it was that a malta officer said: "We've got reports of a super hero incursion, take precautions!" when everyone knows they call us MH-1s.
Mission Two: Go to an instanced Portal Corps map, talk to Akarist. A couple groups of Nemesis attack and you have to defeat them to end the mission. This mission did nothing to advance the story, and it was clearly just there to draw things out.
Mission Three: Wow. It's an escort mission/glowie hunt in Orenbaga. That is PAINFUL. You weave your way through the tiny winding tunnels, with Penny and Sister Psyche tagging along, clicking on a couple glowies (which are, fortunately, pretty easy to find). Meanwhile, Penny must have learned aggro management from her buddy Fusionette, because she was picking a bunch of fights we could have avoided. When I finally got to the end of the map and entered the portal, it took me to an ENTIRELY NEW ORENBAGA MAP and I had to go all the way through that one too.
We finally get to the ritual site, a voice tells us that Mister Wade is going to kill us, so it's BACK through Orenbaga to find the assassin, only this time there's a bunch of Rularuu inside. So we go back through the halls, squish the assassin (she was an Elite Boss level soul mage, as near as I could tell, but she imploded, so I don't really have any idea of what her powers were.) She told us that Psyche had already been dealt with and she was there to kill us. So it's back through Orenbaga again to return to the ritual site.
It turns out that the ritual was booby-trapped and it was all a ruse to supercharge Psyche and force Manticore to kill her. That was actually pretty neat, and whatever complaints I have about these arcs, it's not the cut scenes. Unfortunately, the resolution had nothing to do with the hoops I jumped through to get there. We could have cut out the second mission entirely and huge swaths of the first and third and still had the same story.
I usually run my Hero-aligned toons through a SSA as soon as it's released for the free alignment merit, but I don't think I can bear to bring myself to slog through this one again. -
We were doing the STF. As we were putting it together, somebody remarked that we had a pretty good team, did we want to go for a "Master of" run? The consensus, was, sure, why not?
Our blaster died on the first spawn in the Web factory.
All right. Disband. Restart. Be more careful.
I played conservatively. I'm usually right in the mix of things with my dom, draining psyche like there's no tomorrow, but I don't think I entered melee once during the entire task force. We had a couple close calls, especially around Doctor Aeon, but we hadn't had a death yet as we entered the final mission.
We cleared ourselves some room to maneuver and took down the Flier. The rest of the team started in towards Recluse and I hit Enter to begin typing, "Hey, has anyone looked at the clock? I think it's been almost twenty minutes since we entered and the Flier is on that weird timer. Maybe we should wait a minute, let it spawn and take it down, rather than let it spawn on top of us when we're dealing with Recluse."
What I actually got out was, "Hey, h", because as I was typing that, the Flier spawned DIRECTLY on top of me and unloaded everything it had on top of my poor, squishy dom.
Whereupon I turned on superspeed and zipped away and thought, "Boy, good thing I had the foresight to turn on PFF first!"
So we dropped the flier, dropped the towers and dropped Recluse all in very short order, and my dom became the first of my toons to become a Master of Statesman's Task Force. -
Interestingly, I lost my untimed version of the Dreck farm when I logged on yesterday night. I had another Unai mission in its place.
-
Holy thread necromancy!
-
[ QUOTE ]
So far I've soloed Snaptooth with my 38 Bot/FF Mastermind. The Lieutenant and Boss versions were easy (Malicious level). Elite Boss level was a bit trickier with the large amount of Rascals that would show but there is a way around this. I made sure to clear the area of Counsel before I engage Snaptooth to give me room to maneuver. I found that if I was able to kill Snaptooth and back out of aggro range quick enough he wouldn't move from the spot I defeated him at when he respawned. I would then kill the Rascals that came at me in a nice conga line. Once the Rascals (and any Hooligans that popped up) were dealt with, I turned on Force Bubble, pinned him in a corner with it and told my bots to remove him from my sight.
My 50 Fire/Energy/Fire Blaster will have an easier time - Hover out of range, Boost Range and blast away.
[/ QUOTE ]
I've found that the Nectar temp power helped a lot with Snappy, too. Nail him with it, and he'll help you clear out the rascals. Saved my bacon when things were getting hairy.